Data Quality Management Maturity Model : A Case Study in Higher Education’s Human Resource Department

Yusuf Setiadi, A. Hidayanto, F. Rachmawati, Adhi Yuniarto Laurentius Yohannes
{"title":"Data Quality Management Maturity Model : A Case Study in Higher Education’s Human Resource Department","authors":"Yusuf Setiadi, A. Hidayanto, F. Rachmawati, Adhi Yuniarto Laurentius Yohannes","doi":"10.1109/ICCED53389.2021.9664881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data has increasingly become more imperative in organization’s decision-making process. Low data quality can cause extensive organizational problems, such as inaccurate decision-making and dropped business possibilities. This is because low-quality data does not present a clear description of the actual situation. In Human Resource (HR) management, low data quality can cause recruitment, career development, remuneration, and retirement processes. Therefore, proper data quality management must be implemented to produce data that suits the organization's needs. To determine how far the implementation of data quality management in the organization, measurement of the maturity level in data quality management is conducted. This study presented an evaluation of data quality management maturity level in HR of higher education, applying the Loshin data quality management maturity framework. The results of this study indicate that the maturity level in the Data quality expectations area is 2.17, the maturity level in the Data quality dimensions area is 2.16, the maturity level in the Policies area is 1.22, the maturity level in the Data quality protocols area is 2, 11, the maturity level in the Data governance area is 1.77, the maturity level in the Data standards area is 1.67, the maturity level in the Technology area is 1.44, and the maturity level in the Performance management area is 1.67. The result shows that the Policies area is the lowest due to the lack of regulations and good documentation regarding data management. It can be a concern in conducting evaluations for improving data quality management.","PeriodicalId":6800,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 7th International Conference on Computing, Engineering and Design (ICCED)","volume":"24 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 7th International Conference on Computing, Engineering and Design (ICCED)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCED53389.2021.9664881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Data has increasingly become more imperative in organization’s decision-making process. Low data quality can cause extensive organizational problems, such as inaccurate decision-making and dropped business possibilities. This is because low-quality data does not present a clear description of the actual situation. In Human Resource (HR) management, low data quality can cause recruitment, career development, remuneration, and retirement processes. Therefore, proper data quality management must be implemented to produce data that suits the organization's needs. To determine how far the implementation of data quality management in the organization, measurement of the maturity level in data quality management is conducted. This study presented an evaluation of data quality management maturity level in HR of higher education, applying the Loshin data quality management maturity framework. The results of this study indicate that the maturity level in the Data quality expectations area is 2.17, the maturity level in the Data quality dimensions area is 2.16, the maturity level in the Policies area is 1.22, the maturity level in the Data quality protocols area is 2, 11, the maturity level in the Data governance area is 1.77, the maturity level in the Data standards area is 1.67, the maturity level in the Technology area is 1.44, and the maturity level in the Performance management area is 1.67. The result shows that the Policies area is the lowest due to the lack of regulations and good documentation regarding data management. It can be a concern in conducting evaluations for improving data quality management.
数据质量管理成熟度模型:以高等教育人力资源部门为例
数据在组织决策过程中变得越来越重要。低数据质量可能导致广泛的组织问题,例如不准确的决策和业务可能性下降。这是因为低质量的数据不能清楚地描述实际情况。在人力资源(HR)管理中,低质量的数据会影响招聘、职业发展、薪酬和退休流程。因此,必须实施适当的数据质量管理,以生成适合组织需求的数据。为了确定数据质量管理在组织中的实施程度,需要对数据质量管理的成熟度级别进行度量。本研究采用Loshin数据质量管理成熟度框架,对高等教育人力资源数据质量管理成熟度水平进行评价。本研究结果表明,数据质量期望领域的成熟度为2.17,数据质量维度领域的成熟度为2.16,政策领域的成熟度为1.22,数据质量协议领域的成熟度为2.11,数据治理领域的成熟度为1.77,数据标准领域的成熟度为1.67,技术领域的成熟度为1.44。绩效管理领域成熟度等级为1.67。结果表明,由于缺乏有关数据管理的法规和良好的文档,policy区域的效率最低。在进行评估以改进数据质量管理时,这可能是一个值得关注的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信