The Second Amendment Burden: Arming Courts with a Workable Standard for Reviewing Gun Safety Legislation

M. Kalmanson
{"title":"The Second Amendment Burden: Arming Courts with a Workable Standard for Reviewing Gun Safety Legislation","authors":"M. Kalmanson","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2709435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two hot-button topics; one framework. Second Amendment jurisprudence lacks a workable standard under which courts are to review gun control legislation. This paper presents an intersectional argument that (1) the abortion “undue burden” framework can be translated to Second Amendment legislation; (2) increased gun control provisions, like those recently proposed or discussed, are constitutional under current abortion framework. Though abortion is at the center of this discussion, this piece does not aim to contribute to reproductive rights discourse and accepts prima facie the current-standing framework.","PeriodicalId":81266,"journal":{"name":"Florida State University law review. Florida State University. College of Law","volume":"74 1","pages":"347-384"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Florida State University law review. Florida State University. College of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2709435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Two hot-button topics; one framework. Second Amendment jurisprudence lacks a workable standard under which courts are to review gun control legislation. This paper presents an intersectional argument that (1) the abortion “undue burden” framework can be translated to Second Amendment legislation; (2) increased gun control provisions, like those recently proposed or discussed, are constitutional under current abortion framework. Though abortion is at the center of this discussion, this piece does not aim to contribute to reproductive rights discourse and accepts prima facie the current-standing framework.
第二修正案的负担:用一个可行的标准武装法院审查枪支安全立法
两个热点话题;一个框架。第二修正案的法理缺乏一个可行的标准,法院可以据此审查枪支管制立法。本文提出了一个交叉论点:(1)堕胎“不当负担”框架可以翻译为第二修正案立法;(2)增加的枪支管制条款,如最近提出或讨论的,在目前的堕胎框架下是符合宪法的。虽然堕胎是这个讨论的中心,但这篇文章的目的不是为生殖权利的话语做出贡献,而是初步接受当前的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书