Need to assess the effect of therapy? Ask the patient!

Е.Ю. Полищук, А. Е. Каратеев, А.С. Потапова, Е. С. Филатова, В.Н. Хлабощина, В. Н. Амирджанова, А.М. Лила, E. Y. Polishchuk, Andrey E. Karateev, Alena S. Potapova, E. Filatova, V. N. Khlaboshchina, V. N. Amirjanova, A. Lila
{"title":"Need to assess the effect of therapy? Ask the patient!","authors":"Е.Ю. Полищук, А. Е. Каратеев, А.С. Потапова, Е. С. Филатова, В.Н. Хлабощина, В. Н. Амирджанова, А.М. Лила, E. Y. Polishchuk, Andrey E. Karateev, Alena S. Potapova, E. Filatova, V. N. Khlaboshchina, V. N. Amirjanova, A. Lila","doi":"10.47360/1995-4484-2023-361-368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Achieving a good treatment outcome in rheumatic diseases (RD) requires regular, dynamic patient monitoring and therapy correction if it is not effective or intolerant. The patient assessment must be based on clear criteria to objectify the main manifestations of the disease. For this purpose, the calculation of standard activity and severity indices (DAS28, CDAI, SDAI, BASDAI, ASDAS, DAPSA, PsARC, PASI, etc.) is used. However, this methodology does not always allow the assessment of the fundamentally important parameters of treatment outcome – patient satisfaction and well-being. According to a series of studies, poor therapy satisfaction may be observed in ≈25% of patients with systemic RD who are in remission/low disease activity according to standard indices. Moreover, in 20–30% of cases there is a major discrepancy in the assessment of therapy outcome between the patient and physician. Therefore, a more accurate assessment of the patient’s condition requires, in addition to the calculation of standard indices, the mandatory analysis of patient-reported outcomes – pain, functional impairment, general assessment of disease activity, fatigue, etc. A valuable tool for determining well-being and good therapy outcome from the patient’s point of view is the PASS (“patient acceptable symptom state”). This simple and quite informative index correlates well with core symptoms and indicators of remission/low disease activity. PASS analysis can be used in telemedicine follow-up of patients when an objective examination is not possible. The combined use of PASS and standardized indices can better assess treatment outcomes and improve the quality of life of patients with RD.","PeriodicalId":21518,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology Science and Practice","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47360/1995-4484-2023-361-368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Achieving a good treatment outcome in rheumatic diseases (RD) requires regular, dynamic patient monitoring and therapy correction if it is not effective or intolerant. The patient assessment must be based on clear criteria to objectify the main manifestations of the disease. For this purpose, the calculation of standard activity and severity indices (DAS28, CDAI, SDAI, BASDAI, ASDAS, DAPSA, PsARC, PASI, etc.) is used. However, this methodology does not always allow the assessment of the fundamentally important parameters of treatment outcome – patient satisfaction and well-being. According to a series of studies, poor therapy satisfaction may be observed in ≈25% of patients with systemic RD who are in remission/low disease activity according to standard indices. Moreover, in 20–30% of cases there is a major discrepancy in the assessment of therapy outcome between the patient and physician. Therefore, a more accurate assessment of the patient’s condition requires, in addition to the calculation of standard indices, the mandatory analysis of patient-reported outcomes – pain, functional impairment, general assessment of disease activity, fatigue, etc. A valuable tool for determining well-being and good therapy outcome from the patient’s point of view is the PASS (“patient acceptable symptom state”). This simple and quite informative index correlates well with core symptoms and indicators of remission/low disease activity. PASS analysis can be used in telemedicine follow-up of patients when an objective examination is not possible. The combined use of PASS and standardized indices can better assess treatment outcomes and improve the quality of life of patients with RD.
需要评估治疗效果吗?问病人!
在风湿病(RD)中获得良好的治疗结果需要定期,动态的患者监测和治疗纠正,如果它无效或不耐受。对患者的评估必须基于明确的标准,使疾病的主要表现客观化。为此,使用标准活性和严重程度指数(DAS28、CDAI、SDAI、BASDAI、ASDAS、DAPSA、PsARC、PASI等)的计算。然而,这种方法并不总是允许评估治疗结果的基本重要参数-患者满意度和幸福感。根据一系列研究,约25%的全身性RD患者在标准指标下处于缓解期/疾病活动性较低时,其治疗满意度较差。此外,在20-30%的病例中,患者和医生对治疗结果的评估存在重大差异。因此,为了更准确地评估患者的病情,除了计算标准指标外,还需要对患者报告的结果进行强制性分析,如疼痛、功能损害、疾病活动的一般评估、疲劳等。从患者的角度来看,确定健康和良好治疗结果的一个有价值的工具是PASS(“患者可接受的症状状态”)。这个简单而信息量大的指标与核心症状和缓解/低疾病活动性指标有很好的相关性。PASS分析可用于在无法进行客观检查时对患者进行远程医疗随访。PASS与标准化指标联合使用可以更好地评价RD患者的治疗效果,提高患者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信