The regulatory loss cut-off level: Does it undervalue the operational capital at risk?

Enrique José Jiménez-Rodríguez, José Manuel Feria-Domínguez, José Luis Martín-Marin
{"title":"The regulatory loss cut-off level: Does it undervalue the operational capital at risk?","authors":"Enrique José Jiménez-Rodríguez,&nbsp;José Manuel Feria-Domínguez,&nbsp;José Luis Martín-Marin","doi":"10.1016/j.srfe.2011.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The New Capital Accord (Basel II) proposes a minimum threshold of 10,000 Euros for operational losses when estimating regulatory capital for financial institutions<span>. But since this recommendation is not compulsory for the bank industry, banks are allowed to apply internal thresholds discretionally. In this sense, we analyze the potential impact that the selection of a specific threshold could have on the final estimation of the capital charge for covering operational risk, adopting a critical perspective. For this purpose, by using the Internal Operational Losses Database (IOLD) provided by a Spanish Saving Bank, we apply the Loss Distribution Approach (LDA) for different modelling thresholds. The results confirm the opportunity cost in which banks can incur depending on the internal threshold selected. In addition, we consider that the regulatory threshold, established by the Committee, could result inadequate for some financial institutions due to the relative short length of the current IOLDs.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":101250,"journal":{"name":"The Spanish Review of Financial Economics","volume":"9 2","pages":"Pages 49-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.srfe.2011.09.003","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Spanish Review of Financial Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173126811000180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The New Capital Accord (Basel II) proposes a minimum threshold of 10,000 Euros for operational losses when estimating regulatory capital for financial institutions. But since this recommendation is not compulsory for the bank industry, banks are allowed to apply internal thresholds discretionally. In this sense, we analyze the potential impact that the selection of a specific threshold could have on the final estimation of the capital charge for covering operational risk, adopting a critical perspective. For this purpose, by using the Internal Operational Losses Database (IOLD) provided by a Spanish Saving Bank, we apply the Loss Distribution Approach (LDA) for different modelling thresholds. The results confirm the opportunity cost in which banks can incur depending on the internal threshold selected. In addition, we consider that the regulatory threshold, established by the Committee, could result inadequate for some financial institutions due to the relative short length of the current IOLDs.

监管损失临界值:是否低估了处于风险中的运营资本?
新资本协议(Basel II)在估计金融机构的监管资本时,提出了1万欧元的最低运营损失门槛。但由于这一建议对银行业不是强制性的,因此银行可以酌情适用内部门槛。在这个意义上,我们分析了选择特定阈值可能对覆盖操作风险的资本费用的最终估计产生的潜在影响,采用关键的观点。为此,通过使用西班牙储蓄银行提供的内部操作损失数据库(IOLD),我们将损失分配方法(LDA)应用于不同的建模阈值。结果证实了银行可能产生的机会成本取决于所选择的内部阈值。此外,我们认为委员会设定的监管门槛可能不足以满足一些金融机构的要求,因为目前的iold期限相对较短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信