COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY OF TOTAL LARYNGEAL ANESTHESIA AND SIMPLE LOCAL ANESTHESIA DURING AWAKE FIBEROPTIC BRONCHOSCOPY

PAFMJ Pub Date : 2021-12-30 DOI:10.51253/pafmj.v6i6.5476
Asif Ullah Khan, Muhammad Khalid Azam Khan, A. Khattak, S. Naz, Syed Karamat Hussain Shah Bukhari, Muhammad Tahir Ibrahim
{"title":"COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY OF TOTAL LARYNGEAL ANESTHESIA AND SIMPLE LOCAL ANESTHESIA DURING AWAKE FIBEROPTIC BRONCHOSCOPY","authors":"Asif Ullah Khan, Muhammad Khalid Azam Khan, A. Khattak, S. Naz, Syed Karamat Hussain Shah Bukhari, Muhammad Tahir Ibrahim","doi":"10.51253/pafmj.v6i6.5476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the efficacy of total laryngeal anesthesia and simple local anesthesia during awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy. \nStudy Design: Quasi-experimental study. \nPlace and Duration of Study: Department of Pulmonology, Combined Military Hospital Lahore, from Jan to Jul 2020. \nMethodology: A total of 70 patients, who were undergoing fiberoptic bronchoscopy were divided into two groups. Group-I patients were given topical anesthesia with 2% Lignocaine while group-II patients, in addition to topical Lignocaine, had 2% Lignocaine injected into bilateral internal laryngeal nerves for total laryngeal anesthesia. Assessment of efficacy of anesthesia was evaluated by Reasoner scale. \nResults: In group-I, 26 (74.28%) patients showed mild or moderate cough and gagging during stage-1. Fifteen (42.85%) patients showed moderate cough and gagging that interfered with the procedure during stage-2 and 19 (54.28%) patients showed mild cough or gagging that did not interfere with the procedure in stage-3. In group-II, 17 (48.57%) patients exhibited mild cough or gagging during stage-1. Sixteen (45.71%) exhibited mild cough or gagging that did not interfere with the procedure during stage-2 with all the patients showing either no cough or mild cough and gagging that did not interfere with the procedure during stage-3. More patients of group-II 32 (91.42%) agreed to a repeat test if required medically as compared to group-I 28 (80%). \nConclusion: Patients undergoing fiberoptic bronchoscopy who underwent total laryngeal anesthesia and sedation, in addition to topical anesthesia experienced less cough and gagging than those receiving only local anesthesia.","PeriodicalId":19982,"journal":{"name":"PAFMJ","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAFMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v6i6.5476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of total laryngeal anesthesia and simple local anesthesia during awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Pulmonology, Combined Military Hospital Lahore, from Jan to Jul 2020. Methodology: A total of 70 patients, who were undergoing fiberoptic bronchoscopy were divided into two groups. Group-I patients were given topical anesthesia with 2% Lignocaine while group-II patients, in addition to topical Lignocaine, had 2% Lignocaine injected into bilateral internal laryngeal nerves for total laryngeal anesthesia. Assessment of efficacy of anesthesia was evaluated by Reasoner scale. Results: In group-I, 26 (74.28%) patients showed mild or moderate cough and gagging during stage-1. Fifteen (42.85%) patients showed moderate cough and gagging that interfered with the procedure during stage-2 and 19 (54.28%) patients showed mild cough or gagging that did not interfere with the procedure in stage-3. In group-II, 17 (48.57%) patients exhibited mild cough or gagging during stage-1. Sixteen (45.71%) exhibited mild cough or gagging that did not interfere with the procedure during stage-2 with all the patients showing either no cough or mild cough and gagging that did not interfere with the procedure during stage-3. More patients of group-II 32 (91.42%) agreed to a repeat test if required medically as compared to group-I 28 (80%). Conclusion: Patients undergoing fiberoptic bronchoscopy who underwent total laryngeal anesthesia and sedation, in addition to topical anesthesia experienced less cough and gagging than those receiving only local anesthesia.
清醒纤维支气管镜检查中全喉麻醉与单纯局部麻醉的疗效比较
目的:比较全喉麻醉与单纯局麻在清醒纤维支气管镜检查中的疗效。研究设计:准实验研究。学习地点和时间:2020年1月至7月,拉合尔联合军队医院肺内科。方法:将70例行纤维支气管镜检查的患者分为两组。i组患者给予2%利多卡因表面麻醉,ii组患者在局部麻醉的基础上,在双侧喉内神经内注射2%利多卡因进行全喉麻醉。采用Reasoner评分法评价麻醉效果。结果:ⅰ组26例(74.28%)患者在ⅰ期出现轻、中度咳嗽、呕吐。15例(42.85%)患者在第2期表现为中度咳嗽和呕吐,影响手术;19例(54.28%)患者在第3期表现为轻度咳嗽或呕吐,不影响手术。ii组17例(48.57%)患者在1期出现轻度咳嗽或呕吐。16例(45.71%)在第2阶段表现为轻度咳嗽或呕吐,但不影响手术,所有患者在第3阶段均无咳嗽或轻度咳嗽和呕吐,但不影响手术。与i组28例(80%)相比,ii组32例(91.42%)的患者同意在医学上需要时进行重复测试。结论:纤维支气管镜患者在表面麻醉的基础上进行全喉麻醉和镇静治疗,其咳嗽和呕吐的发生率低于局部麻醉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信