Patient Medication Preferences for Managing Dry Eye Disease: The Importance of Medication Side Effects.

IF 0.8 4区 化学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Semra Ozdemir, Sharon Wan Jie Yeo, Jia Jia Lee, Adithya Bhaskar, Eric Finkelstein, Louis Tong
{"title":"Patient Medication Preferences for Managing Dry Eye Disease: The Importance of Medication Side Effects.","authors":"Semra Ozdemir, Sharon Wan Jie Yeo, Jia Jia Lee, Adithya Bhaskar, Eric Finkelstein, Louis Tong","doi":"10.1007/s40271-022-00586-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The side effects of dry eye medications can lead to medication non-adherence and, eventually, to poor outcomes. This study aimed to quantify to what extent the side effects of dry eye disease (DED) medications (burning/stinging sensation and blurring) are important to patients compared to medication benefits or costs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with DED were recruited at a referral eye center in Singapore (n = 139). This study utilized a Discrete Choice Experiment where patients were presented with 10 choice tasks where they were asked to choose between their current medication (or no medication), and two hypothetical medications that varied based on five attributes: duration of burning/stinging, duration of blurring, time to medication effectiveness, medication frequency, and out-of-pocket cost. The main outcomes were relative attribute importance and predicted uptake.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Latent class logistic regressions found two groups with distinct preferences. For both classes, duration of burning/stinging (Class 1 = 23%, Class 2 = 29%) and cost (Class 1 = 24%, Class 2 = 27%) were the most important attributes while duration of blurring (Class 1 = 15%, Class 2 = 9%) was the least important. The predicted uptake of a medication increased 18 percentage-points when burning/stinging duration decreased from 2 h to a few minutes. The predicted uptake for new medications was lowest for those on medication with well-controlled symptoms and highest for those who were not on medication and could not control their symptoms effectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that duration of burning/stinging was an important factor when choosing medications. Incorporating patient preferences in medication decisions can potentially improve patient acceptance of a treatment regimen.</p>","PeriodicalId":49495,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Chemistry-Suid-Afrikaanse Tydskrif Vir Chemie","volume":"70 1","pages":"679-690"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9192251/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Chemistry-Suid-Afrikaanse Tydskrif Vir Chemie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-022-00586-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The side effects of dry eye medications can lead to medication non-adherence and, eventually, to poor outcomes. This study aimed to quantify to what extent the side effects of dry eye disease (DED) medications (burning/stinging sensation and blurring) are important to patients compared to medication benefits or costs.

Methods: Patients diagnosed with DED were recruited at a referral eye center in Singapore (n = 139). This study utilized a Discrete Choice Experiment where patients were presented with 10 choice tasks where they were asked to choose between their current medication (or no medication), and two hypothetical medications that varied based on five attributes: duration of burning/stinging, duration of blurring, time to medication effectiveness, medication frequency, and out-of-pocket cost. The main outcomes were relative attribute importance and predicted uptake.

Results: Latent class logistic regressions found two groups with distinct preferences. For both classes, duration of burning/stinging (Class 1 = 23%, Class 2 = 29%) and cost (Class 1 = 24%, Class 2 = 27%) were the most important attributes while duration of blurring (Class 1 = 15%, Class 2 = 9%) was the least important. The predicted uptake of a medication increased 18 percentage-points when burning/stinging duration decreased from 2 h to a few minutes. The predicted uptake for new medications was lowest for those on medication with well-controlled symptoms and highest for those who were not on medication and could not control their symptoms effectively.

Conclusion: This study showed that duration of burning/stinging was an important factor when choosing medications. Incorporating patient preferences in medication decisions can potentially improve patient acceptance of a treatment regimen.

患者对治疗干眼症药物的偏好:药物副作用的重要性。
目的:干眼症药物的副作用会导致患者不坚持用药,最终导致不良后果。本研究旨在量化干眼症(DED)药物的副作用(灼热/刺痛感和模糊)与药物疗效或成本相比,对患者的重要程度:在新加坡的一家眼科转诊中心招募了被诊断为干眼症的患者(n = 139)。本研究采用了离散选择实验,向患者展示了 10 个选择任务,要求他们在当前药物(或不用药)和两种假设药物中做出选择,这两种药物根据以下五个属性而有所不同:灼热/刺痛感持续时间、模糊持续时间、药物起效时间、用药频率和自付费用。主要结果是相对属性重要性和预测服用量:结果:潜类逻辑回归发现有两组人具有不同的偏好。对于这两类人来说,灼热/刺痛持续时间(1 类 = 23%,2 类 = 29%)和费用(1 类 = 24%,2 类 = 27%)是最重要的属性,而模糊持续时间(1 类 = 15%,2 类 = 9%)则是最不重要的属性。当灼烧/刺痛持续时间从 2 小时缩短到几分钟时,预测的药物吸收率增加了 18 个百分点。正在服药且症状控制良好的患者对新药的预测接受率最低,而未服药且无法有效控制症状的患者对新药的预测接受率最高:本研究表明,灼热/刺痛持续时间是选择药物时的一个重要因素。将患者的偏好纳入用药决策中可能会提高患者对治疗方案的接受度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Original work in all branches of chemistry is published in the South African Journal of Chemistry. Contributions in English may take the form of papers, short communications, or critical reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信