Early Oral Rehydration Therapy in Diabetic Ketoacidosis: A Randomized Controlled Study

IF 0.5 Q4 PEDIATRICS
S. Kola, Shalu Gupta, Virendra Kumar
{"title":"Early Oral Rehydration Therapy in Diabetic Ketoacidosis: A Randomized Controlled Study","authors":"S. Kola, Shalu Gupta, Virendra Kumar","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1753459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Objectives We aimed to compare the efficacy of oral versus intravenous (IV) fluid therapy in correcting dehydration in diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) when pH was ≥ 7.25 and Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score was ≥12. We also compared the time to resolution of DKA.\n Subjects Children aged ≤18 years with DKA were included in the study. In our pilot study, 40 children were enrolled from June 2018 to April 2019 and divided into two groups after achieving pH ≥ 7.25 and GCS score ≥ 12.\n Materials and Methods This was an open-label, parallel-arm, randomized control trial conducted in the pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary referral hospital in North India. The IV group (control group) received treatment as per the standard protocol, whereas the oral group (trial group) received only oral fluids; IV fluid was withheld for 48 hours. Dehydration was clinically assessed on admission and after 48 hours, and the proportion of children achieving correction of dehydration was compared. Biochemical parameters were measured over time, and the time taken for resolution was compared between groups.\n Results Both groups achieved successful correction of dehydration. No significant difference was observed in the time taken from randomization to complete resolution of DKA. Hyperchloremia improved significantly earlier in the oral group after randomization.\n Conclusion Early institution of oral rehydration strategy after achieving pH ≥ 7.25 and GCS score ≥ 12 was effective in correcting dehydration at a rate comparable to standard IV rehydration. Hyperchloremia was observed to resolve earlier in patients that received oral rehydration therapy.","PeriodicalId":44426,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1753459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives We aimed to compare the efficacy of oral versus intravenous (IV) fluid therapy in correcting dehydration in diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) when pH was ≥ 7.25 and Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score was ≥12. We also compared the time to resolution of DKA. Subjects Children aged ≤18 years with DKA were included in the study. In our pilot study, 40 children were enrolled from June 2018 to April 2019 and divided into two groups after achieving pH ≥ 7.25 and GCS score ≥ 12. Materials and Methods This was an open-label, parallel-arm, randomized control trial conducted in the pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary referral hospital in North India. The IV group (control group) received treatment as per the standard protocol, whereas the oral group (trial group) received only oral fluids; IV fluid was withheld for 48 hours. Dehydration was clinically assessed on admission and after 48 hours, and the proportion of children achieving correction of dehydration was compared. Biochemical parameters were measured over time, and the time taken for resolution was compared between groups. Results Both groups achieved successful correction of dehydration. No significant difference was observed in the time taken from randomization to complete resolution of DKA. Hyperchloremia improved significantly earlier in the oral group after randomization. Conclusion Early institution of oral rehydration strategy after achieving pH ≥ 7.25 and GCS score ≥ 12 was effective in correcting dehydration at a rate comparable to standard IV rehydration. Hyperchloremia was observed to resolve earlier in patients that received oral rehydration therapy.
早期口服补液治疗糖尿病酮症酸中毒:一项随机对照研究
目的:比较pH≥7.25、格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)≥12的糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)患者,口服与静脉(IV)液体治疗对纠正脱水的疗效。我们还比较了DKA的时间与分辨率。年龄≤18岁的DKA患儿被纳入研究。在我们的试点研究中,我们于2018年6月至2019年4月招募了40名儿童,并在pH≥7.25和GCS评分≥12后分为两组。材料和方法这是一项开放标签、平行对照、随机对照试验,在印度北部一家三级转诊医院的儿科重症监护室进行。静脉注射组(对照组)按照标准方案进行治疗,而口服组(试验组)只接受口服液治疗;静脉输液暂停48小时。入院时和入院后48小时对患儿脱水情况进行临床评估,并比较患儿脱水得到纠正的比例。随着时间的推移测量生化参数,并比较各组之间的解决时间。结果两组均成功矫正脱水。从随机分组到完全解决DKA所需的时间无显著差异。随机分组后,口服组高氯血症改善明显早。结论在达到pH≥7.25、GCS评分≥12后,早期实施口服补液策略对纠正脱水有效,其速度与标准静脉补液相当。在接受口服补液治疗的患者中,观察到高氯血症较早消退。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
14.30%
发文量
60
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信