Comparison of Umbilical Cord Arterial Blood Gas and Neonatal Outcomes in Women with and without Meconium-Stained Amniotic Fluid During Labor

IF 0.3 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
M. Dehghan, Sanaz Mousavi, Aisan Akhgari, Maryam Hoseinzadeh, M. Mirghafourvand, Rosa Tafreshi, L. Nikniaz
{"title":"Comparison of Umbilical Cord Arterial Blood Gas and Neonatal Outcomes in Women with and without Meconium-Stained Amniotic Fluid During Labor","authors":"M. Dehghan, Sanaz Mousavi, Aisan Akhgari, Maryam Hoseinzadeh, M. Mirghafourvand, Rosa Tafreshi, L. Nikniaz","doi":"10.2174/1573404819666220804091008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nMeconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) may increase maternal and neonatal complications. The favorable mode of delivery is controversial in women with MSAF. This study aimed to compare umbilical cord arterial blood gas (ABG) and neonatal outcomes in deliveries complicated by meconium and clear amniotic fluid during the active phase of labor.\n\n\n\nThis observational study was performed on 144 term pregnant women (72 with MSAF and 72 with clear amniotic fluid) during the active phase of labor with ruptured membranes admitted to Al-Zahra and Taleghani hospitals in Tabriz, Iran from June 2019 to June 2020. A checklist was used to record the ABG and neonatal outcomes.\n\n\n\nThe frequency of cesarean delivery in the MSAF group (25%) was significantly higher than in the women with clear amniotic fluid (20%) (P= 0.006). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding pH, base excess, PCO2, 1- and 5- minute Apgar scores, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission of the newborn due to MSAF (P> 0.05). There was no incidence of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, sepsis, and seizure.\n\n\n\nGiven the non-significant difference between two groups of women with and without MSAF during labor in terms of neonatal outcomes and umbilical cord ABG, it seems that MSAF alone is not an indication for cesarean delivery. Thus, vaginal delivery is recommended in pregnant women with MSAF.\n","PeriodicalId":11030,"journal":{"name":"Current Women s Health Reviews","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Women s Health Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573404819666220804091008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) may increase maternal and neonatal complications. The favorable mode of delivery is controversial in women with MSAF. This study aimed to compare umbilical cord arterial blood gas (ABG) and neonatal outcomes in deliveries complicated by meconium and clear amniotic fluid during the active phase of labor. This observational study was performed on 144 term pregnant women (72 with MSAF and 72 with clear amniotic fluid) during the active phase of labor with ruptured membranes admitted to Al-Zahra and Taleghani hospitals in Tabriz, Iran from June 2019 to June 2020. A checklist was used to record the ABG and neonatal outcomes. The frequency of cesarean delivery in the MSAF group (25%) was significantly higher than in the women with clear amniotic fluid (20%) (P= 0.006). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding pH, base excess, PCO2, 1- and 5- minute Apgar scores, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission of the newborn due to MSAF (P> 0.05). There was no incidence of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, sepsis, and seizure. Given the non-significant difference between two groups of women with and without MSAF during labor in terms of neonatal outcomes and umbilical cord ABG, it seems that MSAF alone is not an indication for cesarean delivery. Thus, vaginal delivery is recommended in pregnant women with MSAF.
产程中羊水有粪和无粪的妇女脐带动脉血气和新生儿结局的比较
羊水粪染色(MSAF)可能增加产妇和新生儿并发症。对MSAF妇女有利的分娩方式存在争议。本研究旨在比较产程活跃期伴有胎粪和清羊水的产妇脐带动脉血气(ABG)和新生儿结局。本观察性研究对2019年6月至2020年6月在伊朗大不里士的Al-Zahra和Taleghani医院住院的144名产程活跃期胎膜破裂的足月孕妇(72名患有MSAF, 72名羊水清澈)进行了研究。使用检查表记录ABG和新生儿结局。MSAF组剖宫产率(25%)显著高于羊水清澈组(20%)(P= 0.006)。两组间pH值、碱过量、二氧化碳分压、1分钟和5分钟Apgar评分以及新生儿因MSAF而入住新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)的差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。没有缺氧缺血性脑病、败血症和癫痫发作的发生。考虑到两组有和没有MSAF的妇女在分娩期间新生儿结局和脐带ABG方面没有显著差异,似乎MSAF本身并不是剖宫产的指征。因此,建议阴道分娩的孕妇与MSAF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Women s Health Reviews
Current Women s Health Reviews OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Current Women"s Health Reviews publishes frontier reviews on all the latest advances on obstetrics and gynecology. The journal"s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles dedicated to research in the field. The journal is essential reading for all clinicians and researchers in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信