Test of Gross Motor Development–3 Validity and Reliability: A Screening Form

IF 0.8 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL

Journal of Motor Learning and Development Pub Date : 2021-09-24 DOI:10.1123/jmld.2020-0061

N. Valentini, G. Nobre, Larissa Wagner Zanella, K. Pereira, M. Albuquerque, M. Rudisill

{"title":"Test of Gross Motor Development–3 Validity and Reliability: A Screening Form","authors":"N. Valentini, G. Nobre, Larissa Wagner Zanella, K. Pereira, M. Albuquerque, M. Rudisill","doi":"10.1123/jmld.2020-0061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Test of Gross Motor Development–3 (TGMD-3) is used to assess locomotor (LOCS) and ball (BS) skills in children. This test provides relevant information for evaluating learning and determining teaching efficacy. However, conducting and coding the test is time consuming. A screening form may improve its usage in specific settings and populations. Purpose: This study aimed to develop a screening form for the TGMD-3-SF and examine its validity and reliability. Method: We assessed 1,192 3-to-10-year-old children; 772 children completed the TGMD-3 and 420 the TGMD-3-SF; 114 children were retested for temporal stability and 300 for criterion validity. Results: We found appropriate results for the two-factors model, LOCS (gallop, hop, and skip) and BS (one-hand strike, kick, and overhand throw), RMSEA = .025, comparative-fit index = .99, and Tukey–Lewis index = .99; internal consistency (LOCS, α = .60; BS, α = .71); item validity (LOCS, r = .43, p < .001; BS, r = .47, p < .001); interrater (ICC = .86–.99), intrarater (ICC = .61–.92), test–retest (LOCS, ICC =.87; BS, ICC = .78) reliability, and concurrent validity (LOCS, r = .89, p < .01; BS, r = .90, p < .001). Conclusions: The TGMD-3-SF is valid and reliable for assessing children’s gross motor development.","PeriodicalId":37368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Motor Learning and Development","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Motor Learning and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2020-0061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: The Test of Gross Motor Development–3 (TGMD-3) is used to assess locomotor (LOCS) and ball (BS) skills in children. This test provides relevant information for evaluating learning and determining teaching efficacy. However, conducting and coding the test is time consuming. A screening form may improve its usage in specific settings and populations. Purpose: This study aimed to develop a screening form for the TGMD-3-SF and examine its validity and reliability. Method: We assessed 1,192 3-to-10-year-old children; 772 children completed the TGMD-3 and 420 the TGMD-3-SF; 114 children were retested for temporal stability and 300 for criterion validity. Results: We found appropriate results for the two-factors model, LOCS (gallop, hop, and skip) and BS (one-hand strike, kick, and overhand throw), RMSEA = .025, comparative-fit index = .99, and Tukey–Lewis index = .99; internal consistency (LOCS, α = .60; BS, α = .71); item validity (LOCS, r = .43, p < .001; BS, r = .47, p < .001); interrater (ICC = .86–.99), intrarater (ICC = .61–.92), test–retest (LOCS, ICC =.87; BS, ICC = .78) reliability, and concurrent validity (LOCS, r = .89, p < .01; BS, r = .90, p < .001). Conclusions: The TGMD-3-SF is valid and reliable for assessing children’s gross motor development.

查看原文本刊更多论文

大肌肉运动发展测验- 3效度与信度:筛选表

背景:大肌肉运动发展测试-3 (TGMD-3)用于评估儿童的运动(LOCS)和球(BS)技能。该测试为评价学习和确定教学效果提供了相关信息。然而，执行和编码测试是非常耗时的。一种筛查形式可以提高其在特定环境和人群中的使用率。目的:本研究旨在建立TGMD-3-SF的筛选表，并检验其效度和信度。方法:我们评估了1,192名3- 10岁儿童;772名儿童完成TGMD-3, 420名儿童完成TGMD-3- sf;114名儿童重测时间稳定性，300名重测标准效度。结果:我们找到了适合的双因素模型，LOCS(飞奔、跳跃和跳跃)和BS(单手打击、踢腿和上手投掷)，RMSEA =。[25]比较拟合指数=。99, Tukey-Lewis指数= .99;内部一致性(los， α = 0.60;b， α = 0.71);项目效度(LOCS, r =。43, p < .001;b, r =。47, p < .001);inter - ater (ICC = 0.86 - 0.99)， intrarater (ICC = 0.61 - 0.92)， test-retest (LOCS, ICC = 0.87;BS, ICC = .78)信度，同时效度(LOCS, r =。89, p < 0.01;b, r =。90, p < 0.001)。结论:TGMD-3-SF量表用于评估儿童大动作发展是有效可靠的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Motor Learning and Development Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

CiteScore

2.20

自引率

15.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Motor Learning and Development (JMLD) publishes peer-reviewed research that advances the understanding of movement skill acquisition and expression across the lifespan. JMLD aims to provide a platform for theoretical, translational, applied, and innovative research related to factors that influence the learning or re-learning of skills in individuals with various movement-relevant abilities and disabilities.