Comparison between effectivity of povidone Iodin 1% application with swab technique and rinse to the number of bacteria colonization as an aseptic action in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Sumatera Utara

I. Isnandar, Hendry Rusdy, I. B. Siregar, Nur Syamimi
{"title":"Comparison between effectivity of povidone Iodin 1% application with swab technique and rinse to the number of bacteria colonization as an aseptic action in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Sumatera Utara","authors":"I. Isnandar, Hendry Rusdy, I. B. Siregar, Nur Syamimi","doi":"10.15562/JDMFS.V0I0.848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare between effectivity of povidone iodin 1% application with swab technique and rinse to the number of bacteria colonization as an aseptic action at the Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Sumatera Utara. Material and Methods: This was an experimental study with posttest only control group design approach. Purposive technique is applied to collect samples which are clinical students. In this study, sample were divided into 4 groups and each consisting of 10 people. The sample was divided into negative control group with 0.9% normal saline and 1% povidone iodine treatment group with two techniques which is swab and gargle. Results: Based on Mann-Whitney test result on 1% Povidone Iodin group which was rinse and swab technique obtained p-value = 0.382 where p-value > 0.05 so it can be concluded that there is no significant difference between 1% Povidone Iodine in rinsing technique and 1% Povidone Iodine in swabbing. Conclusion: Rinsing was more effective than swab as an aseptic action with 1% Povidone Iodine.","PeriodicalId":31119,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15562/JDMFS.V0I0.848","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare between effectivity of povidone iodin 1% application with swab technique and rinse to the number of bacteria colonization as an aseptic action at the Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Sumatera Utara. Material and Methods: This was an experimental study with posttest only control group design approach. Purposive technique is applied to collect samples which are clinical students. In this study, sample were divided into 4 groups and each consisting of 10 people. The sample was divided into negative control group with 0.9% normal saline and 1% povidone iodine treatment group with two techniques which is swab and gargle. Results: Based on Mann-Whitney test result on 1% Povidone Iodin group which was rinse and swab technique obtained p-value = 0.382 where p-value > 0.05 so it can be concluded that there is no significant difference between 1% Povidone Iodine in rinsing technique and 1% Povidone Iodine in swabbing. Conclusion: Rinsing was more effective than swab as an aseptic action with 1% Povidone Iodine.
苏门答腊大学口腔颌面外科口腔科1%聚维酮碘拭子法与冲洗法消毒对细菌定植数量的影响
目的:比较1%聚维酮碘擦拭法和冲洗法在苏门答腊岛大学口腔外科的无菌处理中对细菌定植数量的影响。材料与方法:本研究采用后测纯对照组设计方法。采用目的技术采集临床学生样本。在本研究中,样本被分为4组,每组10人。将标本分为0.9%生理盐水阴性对照组和1%聚维酮碘治疗组,采用拭子和漱口两种方法。结果:1%聚维酮碘冲洗拭子法组的Mann-Whitney检验结果为p值= 0.382,p值> 0.05,说明1%聚维酮碘冲洗法与1%聚维酮碘拭子法无显著性差异。结论:1%聚维酮碘冲洗消毒效果优于棉签消毒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信