The Concepts of "Primitive" and "Native" in Anthropology

Q4 Social Sciences
E. Dozier
{"title":"The Concepts of \"Primitive\" and \"Native\" in Anthropology","authors":"E. Dozier","doi":"10.1086/yearanth.0.3031146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"thropological theory, because such views and the development of theory bear im? portant relations to one another. A sketch on field methods and techniques has also been included, again because the approach to field work appears largely to be the result of the specific concepts and attitudes that anthropologists have toward nonliter? ate societies. Finally, the terms \"primitive,\" \"native,\" and the like, are analyzed for their validity as descriptive and taxonomic designations and with reference to their reception by the public-at-large and the peoples so designated. The problem of terminological designa? tions for nonliterate societies is an espe? cially serious one. The fact that \"primitive,\" \"native,\" and similar terms are often placed within quotation marks indicates the shaky and unsure ground upon which they rest as designations for the societies which an? thropologists study. That these terms are not used in a definitive and precise fashion reflects the growing and changing science of anthropology and also a changing world situation. As a science grows and matures it revises and regulates its terminology. More appropriate terms, both in a descrip? tive and taxonomic sense, replace the older and less appropriate designations. Among anthropologists there is an increasing awareness that these terms are unsatisfac-","PeriodicalId":49351,"journal":{"name":"Yearbook of Physical Anthropology","volume":"42 1","pages":"187 - 202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1955-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yearbook of Physical Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/yearanth.0.3031146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

thropological theory, because such views and the development of theory bear im? portant relations to one another. A sketch on field methods and techniques has also been included, again because the approach to field work appears largely to be the result of the specific concepts and attitudes that anthropologists have toward nonliter? ate societies. Finally, the terms "primitive," "native," and the like, are analyzed for their validity as descriptive and taxonomic designations and with reference to their reception by the public-at-large and the peoples so designated. The problem of terminological designa? tions for nonliterate societies is an espe? cially serious one. The fact that "primitive," "native," and similar terms are often placed within quotation marks indicates the shaky and unsure ground upon which they rest as designations for the societies which an? thropologists study. That these terms are not used in a definitive and precise fashion reflects the growing and changing science of anthropology and also a changing world situation. As a science grows and matures it revises and regulates its terminology. More appropriate terms, both in a descrip? tive and taxonomic sense, replace the older and less appropriate designations. Among anthropologists there is an increasing awareness that these terms are unsatisfac-
人类学中的“原始”与“本土”概念
人类学理论,因为这样的观点与理论的发展有何关系?彼此之间的重要关系。关于野外方法和技术的概述也被包括在内,再次因为野外工作的方法似乎在很大程度上是人类学家对非自然的具体概念和态度的结果。吃了的社会。最后,对“原始”、“土著”等术语进行分析,以确定它们作为描述性和分类学名称的有效性,并参考公众和被指定的民族对它们的接受程度。术语设计的问题?对没有文化的社会来说,战争是一种逃避。非常严重的问题。“原始的”、“本地的”和类似的术语经常被放在引号里,这一事实表明,它们作为人类社会的名称所依据的依据是不可靠和不确定的。thropologists研究。这些术语并没有以一种明确和精确的方式使用,这反映了人类学的发展和变化,也反映了不断变化的世界形势。随着一门科学的发展和成熟,它会修改和规范自己的术语。更合适的术语,都在描述中?Tive和分类学意义,取代旧的和不适当的名称。在人类学家中,越来越多的人意识到这些术语是不令人满意的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Yearbook of Physical Anthropology
Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 生物-进化生物学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信