Systematic Review and Guidelines for Management of Scrotal Inguinal Hernias.

IF 0.7 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Methods and Objects of Chemical Analysis Pub Date : 2023-03-27 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3389/jaws.2023.11195
Hanh Minh Tran, Ian MacQueen, David Chen, Maarten Simons
{"title":"Systematic Review and Guidelines for Management of Scrotal Inguinal Hernias.","authors":"Hanh Minh Tran, Ian MacQueen, David Chen, Maarten Simons","doi":"10.3389/jaws.2023.11195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Of the more than 20 million patients undergoing groin hernia repair annually worldwide, 6% are scrotal hernias in high resource countries rising to 67% in low resource countries which represents a heavy disease burden on relatively young men during their most productive period of life. There are many open questions concerning management of scrotal hernia. These guidelines aim to improve the care for scrotal hernia patients by reducing recurrence rates, chronic pain and infection. <b>Methods:</b> After developing 19 key questions a systematic literature review was performed till 31 March 2021 for all relevant publications with search terms related to Scrotal Hernia. The articles were scored by all co-authors according to Oxford, SIGN and Grade methodologies. Statements and recommendations were formulated. Online Consensus meetings with 25 HerniaSurge members were organised with voting and grading Recommendations as \"strong\" (recommendations) or \"weak\" (suggestions) and by consensus, in some cases upgraded. <b>Results:</b> Only 23 articles (two level 2 registry and 21 level 3-5) were selected. It is proposed to define scrotal hernia as an inguinal hernia which has descended into and causes any scrotal distortion. A new classification for scrotal hernias was proposed based on hernia size, SI for upper third thigh, SII for middle thigh and SIII for lower third thigh or below. Irreducibility is denoted with IR. Despite weak evidence antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended. Urinary catheterization is recommended (upgraded) in complex cases (S2-3) due to prolonged operative time. Scrotal hernia repairs have higher associated morbidity and mortality compared to non-complex groin hernia repairs irrespective of surgical experience. Open anterior (mesh) approach is commonest technique and suture techniques in low resource countries. For minimally invasive approaches, TAPP resulted in less conversion to open approach compared to TEP. <b>Conclusion:</b> Although the evidence is scarce and often low quality scrotal hernia management guidelines aim to lead to better surgical outcomes irrespective of where patients live. This necessarily means a more tailored approach based on available resources and appropriate skills. The guidelines provide an impetus for future research where adoption of proposed classification will enable more meaningful comparison of different techniques for different hernia sizes.</p>","PeriodicalId":18626,"journal":{"name":"Methods and Objects of Chemical Analysis","volume":"1 1","pages":"11195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10831669/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods and Objects of Chemical Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/jaws.2023.11195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Of the more than 20 million patients undergoing groin hernia repair annually worldwide, 6% are scrotal hernias in high resource countries rising to 67% in low resource countries which represents a heavy disease burden on relatively young men during their most productive period of life. There are many open questions concerning management of scrotal hernia. These guidelines aim to improve the care for scrotal hernia patients by reducing recurrence rates, chronic pain and infection. Methods: After developing 19 key questions a systematic literature review was performed till 31 March 2021 for all relevant publications with search terms related to Scrotal Hernia. The articles were scored by all co-authors according to Oxford, SIGN and Grade methodologies. Statements and recommendations were formulated. Online Consensus meetings with 25 HerniaSurge members were organised with voting and grading Recommendations as "strong" (recommendations) or "weak" (suggestions) and by consensus, in some cases upgraded. Results: Only 23 articles (two level 2 registry and 21 level 3-5) were selected. It is proposed to define scrotal hernia as an inguinal hernia which has descended into and causes any scrotal distortion. A new classification for scrotal hernias was proposed based on hernia size, SI for upper third thigh, SII for middle thigh and SIII for lower third thigh or below. Irreducibility is denoted with IR. Despite weak evidence antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended. Urinary catheterization is recommended (upgraded) in complex cases (S2-3) due to prolonged operative time. Scrotal hernia repairs have higher associated morbidity and mortality compared to non-complex groin hernia repairs irrespective of surgical experience. Open anterior (mesh) approach is commonest technique and suture techniques in low resource countries. For minimally invasive approaches, TAPP resulted in less conversion to open approach compared to TEP. Conclusion: Although the evidence is scarce and often low quality scrotal hernia management guidelines aim to lead to better surgical outcomes irrespective of where patients live. This necessarily means a more tailored approach based on available resources and appropriate skills. The guidelines provide an impetus for future research where adoption of proposed classification will enable more meaningful comparison of different techniques for different hernia sizes.

阴囊腹股沟疝管理的系统性回顾和指南。
导言:在全球每年接受腹股沟疝修补术的 2000 多万名患者中,资源丰富国家的阴囊疝患者占 6%,而资源匮乏国家的比例则高达 67%,这意味着相对年轻的男性在其一生中最有生产力的时期承受着沉重的疾病负担。关于阴囊疝的治疗,还有许多问题尚未解决。本指南旨在通过减少复发率、慢性疼痛和感染来改善阴囊疝患者的治疗。方法:提出 19 个关键问题后,在 2021 年 3 月 31 日前对所有与阴囊疝相关的出版物进行了系统性文献回顾。所有共同作者根据牛津、SIGN 和等级方法对文章进行评分。制定了声明和建议。由 25 名疝气研究小组成员参加的在线共识会议组织了投票,并将建议分为 "强"(建议)或 "弱"(建议)等级,在某些情况下,通过共识将建议升级。结果:只有 23 篇文章(2 篇 2 级登记文章和 21 篇 3-5 级文章)入选。建议将阴囊疝定义为腹股沟斜疝并导致阴囊变形。根据疝气的大小,提出了阴囊疝的新分类方法:SI 表示大腿第三上段,SII 表示大腿中部,SIII 表示大腿第三下段或以下。不可还原性用 IR 表示。尽管证据不足,但仍建议使用抗生素预防。由于手术时间较长,建议在复杂病例(S2-3)中使用导尿管(升级版)。与非复杂的腹股沟疝修补术相比,无论手术经验如何,阴囊疝修补术的相关发病率和死亡率都较高。在资源匮乏的国家,开放式前部(网状)方法是最常见的技术,也是最常用的缝合技术。就微创方法而言,TAPP 与 TEP 相比,转为开放式方法的情况较少。结论:尽管证据稀少,而且往往质量不高,但阴囊疝管理指南的目标是,无论患者居住在哪里,都能获得更好的手术效果。这必然意味着要根据可用资源和适当技能采取更有针对性的方法。该指南为未来的研究提供了动力,在未来的研究中,采用建议的分类方法将能对不同疝气大小的不同技术进行更有意义的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The journal "Methods and objects of chemical analysis" is peer-review journal and publishes original articles of theoretical and experimental analysis on topical issues and bio-analytical chemistry, chemical and pharmaceutical analysis, as well as chemical metrology. Submitted works shall cover the results of completed studies and shall make scientific contributions to the relevant area of expertise. The journal publishes review articles, research articles and articles related to latest developments of analytical instrumentations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信