Patient Characteristics Associated With Optimal Telemedicine Experience in Maternal–Fetal Medicine (MFM) [ID: 1368093]

Miranda A Rep, J. Gillenwater, A. Mackeen, Michael Power, Adam D. Troy
{"title":"Patient Characteristics Associated With Optimal Telemedicine Experience in Maternal–Fetal Medicine (MFM) [ID: 1368093]","authors":"Miranda A Rep, J. Gillenwater, A. Mackeen, Michael Power, Adam D. Troy","doi":"10.1097/01.AOG.0000931024.22570.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Data regarding patient satisfaction with telemedicine use in obstetrics are limited. Our objective was to identify demographics and their effect on patient satisfaction with telemedicine in maternal–fetal medicine (MFM) to better identify patients who may prefer this modality. METHODS: An IRB-approved prospective survey was offered to patients in MFM from March 2022 to May 2022. Telemedicine experience was not required. Demographics and responses to statements comparing telemedicine versus in-person appointments were collected via a 5-point Likert scale. Telemedicine was defined as an appointment where provider–patient interaction occurred via telecommunications technology. The primary outcome was patient characteristics associated with telemedicine satisfaction. Exploratory factor analysis was performed to identify components affecting patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 327 patients. Factor analysis yielded two components from eight statements: “attentiveness” from the provider and “technology” comfort. Telemedicine was viewed neutrally for attentiveness-related questions and favorably for technology-related questions. While both factors were significantly associated with desire for future telemedicine option, the effect of attentiveness was twice as strong as that of technology in multiple regression. Higher education level and being married were significantly associated with lower levels of perceived attentiveness. Employment and telemedicine experience were significantly associated with increased technology comfort. Those with telemedicine experience and higher technology comfort experienced statistically fewer connection problems. CONCLUSION: Telemedicine was viewed neutrally or favorably for the factors studied. Perceived provider attentiveness and technology comfort affected patient satisfaction with telemedicine; each is associated with certain patient demographics. Once validated, this scale can be used to identify patients who may prefer telemedicine appointments.","PeriodicalId":19405,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000931024.22570.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Data regarding patient satisfaction with telemedicine use in obstetrics are limited. Our objective was to identify demographics and their effect on patient satisfaction with telemedicine in maternal–fetal medicine (MFM) to better identify patients who may prefer this modality. METHODS: An IRB-approved prospective survey was offered to patients in MFM from March 2022 to May 2022. Telemedicine experience was not required. Demographics and responses to statements comparing telemedicine versus in-person appointments were collected via a 5-point Likert scale. Telemedicine was defined as an appointment where provider–patient interaction occurred via telecommunications technology. The primary outcome was patient characteristics associated with telemedicine satisfaction. Exploratory factor analysis was performed to identify components affecting patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 327 patients. Factor analysis yielded two components from eight statements: “attentiveness” from the provider and “technology” comfort. Telemedicine was viewed neutrally for attentiveness-related questions and favorably for technology-related questions. While both factors were significantly associated with desire for future telemedicine option, the effect of attentiveness was twice as strong as that of technology in multiple regression. Higher education level and being married were significantly associated with lower levels of perceived attentiveness. Employment and telemedicine experience were significantly associated with increased technology comfort. Those with telemedicine experience and higher technology comfort experienced statistically fewer connection problems. CONCLUSION: Telemedicine was viewed neutrally or favorably for the factors studied. Perceived provider attentiveness and technology comfort affected patient satisfaction with telemedicine; each is associated with certain patient demographics. Once validated, this scale can be used to identify patients who may prefer telemedicine appointments.
母胎医学中远程医疗体验与患者特征的关系[j]
关于远程医疗在产科使用的患者满意度的数据是有限的。我们的目的是确定人口统计数据及其对母胎医学(MFM)远程医疗患者满意度的影响,以更好地确定可能更喜欢这种模式的患者。方法:2022年3月至2022年5月,对MFM患者进行了一项经irb批准的前瞻性调查。不需要远程医疗经验。通过5分李克特量表收集了人口统计数据和对比较远程医疗与面对面预约的陈述的反应。远程医疗被定义为通过电信技术进行医患互动的预约。主要结果是与远程医疗满意度相关的患者特征。进行探索性因素分析以确定影响患者满意度的因素。结果:327例患者完成了问卷调查。因子分析从8个陈述中得出两个组成部分:来自提供者的“注意力”和“技术”舒适度。远程医疗在与注意力相关的问题上被认为是中立的,而在与技术相关的问题上被认为是有利的。虽然这两个因素都与未来远程医疗选择的愿望显著相关,但在多元回归中,注意力的影响是技术的两倍强。高等教育水平和婚姻与较低的注意力感知水平显著相关。就业和远程医疗经验与技术舒适度的提高显著相关。那些有远程医疗经验和更高技术舒适度的人经历的连接问题在统计上更少。结论:对远程医疗的评价是中性或有利的。感知提供者注意力和技术舒适度影响远程医疗患者满意度;每一种都与特定的患者统计数据相关联。一旦验证,该量表可用于识别可能更喜欢远程医疗预约的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信