Abstract A45: Treatment patterns and outcomes among platinum-refractory/resistant ovarian cancer patients

R. Parikh, S. Kurosky, M. Udall, Jane Chang, J. Cappelleri, J. Doherty, J. Kaye
{"title":"Abstract A45: Treatment patterns and outcomes among platinum-refractory/resistant ovarian cancer patients","authors":"R. Parikh, S. Kurosky, M. Udall, Jane Chang, J. Cappelleri, J. Doherty, J. Kaye","doi":"10.1158/1557-3265.OVCA17-A45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Real-world evidence on current treatment patterns and outcomes is limited for patients with platinum-refractory/resistant epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer (PRROC). This study aimed to describe the treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with PRROC in the United States (US), the United Kingdom (UK), and Canada (CA). Methods: Physicians retrospectively reviewed medical records of females aged ≥18 years diagnosed with PRROC from January 2010 to June 2014. Follow-up data available through October 2016 were extracted. Patient characteristics, initial PRROC treatment regimens, and associated health care utilization were assessed descriptively; clinical outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional-hazards methods. Results: Data were obtained on 392 US, 296 UK, and 82 CA patients. At initial diagnosis of epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer, 65.8% (US), 93.3% (UK), and 82.9% (CA) of patients had stage III/IV disease and 43.6% (US), 73.7% (UK), and 56.1% (CA) had high-grade tumors. Most patients were diagnosed with PRROC in 2013 or 2014 (US: 64.8%, UK: 72.3%, CA: 64.6%) and mean age at PRROC diagnosis was 57 years in the US and CA and 59 years in the UK. The proportion of patients with ECOG performance status (PS) ≤1 at PRROC diagnosis was 57.7% in the US, 80.1% in the UK, and 36.6% in CA. Most patients received systemic treatment after PRROC diagnosis (US 71.4%; UK 83.1%; CA 81.7%). Most of the patients received only one treatment line at the time of extraction (US: 64.3%, UK: 75.6%, CA: 70.2%). Bevacizumab ± chemotherapy (US 41.4%; UK 12.6%; CA 35.8%) and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) monotherapy (US 18.6%; UK 50.0%; CA 34.3%) were the most common initial therapies. Common subsequent treatments varied between the countries, including topotecan, gemcitabine, PLD, paclitaxel. During initial treatment for PRROC, 80.7%, 59.8%, and 44.8% of patients had at least one office visit and 18.9%, 7.3%, and 19.4% of patients had at least one emergency department visit in the US, UK, and CA, respectively. Hospitalizations during initial treatment for PRROC were observed among 17.5% of patients in the US, 10.2% in the UK, and 14.9% in CA. Treatment toxicity was the most common reason for hospitalization (US 75.5%; UK 64.0%; CA 80.0%). Median progression-free survival (PFS; 95% confidence interval) was 6.4 (5.4-9.3), 8.0 (6.8-9.2), and 5.6 (4.9-6.2) months in the US, UK, and CA, respectively. The Cox proportional-hazards model showed that stage III/IV, high-grade tumors, and poorer PS were associated with shorter survival. Conclusions: Even though bevacizumab ± chemotherapy and PLD were the most common initial PRROC treatments in the three countries, relatively higher utilization of bevacizumab ± chemotherapy was observed in the US and CA than the UK, plausibly due to lack of bevacizumab reimbursement in the UK for the treatment of PRROC. Limited PFS and a high prevalence of hospitalization due to treatment toxicity observed with initial treatments suggest a continued need for more effective and tolerable treatment strategies for PRROC. Citation Format: Rohan Parikh, Samantha Kurosky, Margarita Udall, Jane Chang, Joseph C. Cappelleri, Jim P. Doherty, James A. Kaye. Treatment patterns and outcomes among platinum-refractory/resistant ovarian cancer patients. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Conference: Addressing Critical Questions in Ovarian Cancer Research and Treatment; Oct 1-4, 2017; Pittsburgh, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2018;24(15_Suppl):Abstract nr A45.","PeriodicalId":18646,"journal":{"name":"Metabolic Changes in Ovarian Cancer","volume":"79 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metabolic Changes in Ovarian Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.OVCA17-A45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Real-world evidence on current treatment patterns and outcomes is limited for patients with platinum-refractory/resistant epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer (PRROC). This study aimed to describe the treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with PRROC in the United States (US), the United Kingdom (UK), and Canada (CA). Methods: Physicians retrospectively reviewed medical records of females aged ≥18 years diagnosed with PRROC from January 2010 to June 2014. Follow-up data available through October 2016 were extracted. Patient characteristics, initial PRROC treatment regimens, and associated health care utilization were assessed descriptively; clinical outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional-hazards methods. Results: Data were obtained on 392 US, 296 UK, and 82 CA patients. At initial diagnosis of epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer, 65.8% (US), 93.3% (UK), and 82.9% (CA) of patients had stage III/IV disease and 43.6% (US), 73.7% (UK), and 56.1% (CA) had high-grade tumors. Most patients were diagnosed with PRROC in 2013 or 2014 (US: 64.8%, UK: 72.3%, CA: 64.6%) and mean age at PRROC diagnosis was 57 years in the US and CA and 59 years in the UK. The proportion of patients with ECOG performance status (PS) ≤1 at PRROC diagnosis was 57.7% in the US, 80.1% in the UK, and 36.6% in CA. Most patients received systemic treatment after PRROC diagnosis (US 71.4%; UK 83.1%; CA 81.7%). Most of the patients received only one treatment line at the time of extraction (US: 64.3%, UK: 75.6%, CA: 70.2%). Bevacizumab ± chemotherapy (US 41.4%; UK 12.6%; CA 35.8%) and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) monotherapy (US 18.6%; UK 50.0%; CA 34.3%) were the most common initial therapies. Common subsequent treatments varied between the countries, including topotecan, gemcitabine, PLD, paclitaxel. During initial treatment for PRROC, 80.7%, 59.8%, and 44.8% of patients had at least one office visit and 18.9%, 7.3%, and 19.4% of patients had at least one emergency department visit in the US, UK, and CA, respectively. Hospitalizations during initial treatment for PRROC were observed among 17.5% of patients in the US, 10.2% in the UK, and 14.9% in CA. Treatment toxicity was the most common reason for hospitalization (US 75.5%; UK 64.0%; CA 80.0%). Median progression-free survival (PFS; 95% confidence interval) was 6.4 (5.4-9.3), 8.0 (6.8-9.2), and 5.6 (4.9-6.2) months in the US, UK, and CA, respectively. The Cox proportional-hazards model showed that stage III/IV, high-grade tumors, and poorer PS were associated with shorter survival. Conclusions: Even though bevacizumab ± chemotherapy and PLD were the most common initial PRROC treatments in the three countries, relatively higher utilization of bevacizumab ± chemotherapy was observed in the US and CA than the UK, plausibly due to lack of bevacizumab reimbursement in the UK for the treatment of PRROC. Limited PFS and a high prevalence of hospitalization due to treatment toxicity observed with initial treatments suggest a continued need for more effective and tolerable treatment strategies for PRROC. Citation Format: Rohan Parikh, Samantha Kurosky, Margarita Udall, Jane Chang, Joseph C. Cappelleri, Jim P. Doherty, James A. Kaye. Treatment patterns and outcomes among platinum-refractory/resistant ovarian cancer patients. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Conference: Addressing Critical Questions in Ovarian Cancer Research and Treatment; Oct 1-4, 2017; Pittsburgh, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2018;24(15_Suppl):Abstract nr A45.
A45:铂难治/耐药卵巢癌患者的治疗模式和结局
背景:对于铂难治/耐药的上皮性卵巢癌、输卵管癌或原发性腹膜癌(proroc)患者,目前的治疗模式和结果的真实证据有限。本研究旨在描述美国(US)、英国(UK)和加拿大(CA) proroc患者的治疗模式和结果。方法:回顾性分析2010年1月至2014年6月诊断为proroc的年龄≥18岁女性的病历。提取截至2016年10月的随访数据。描述性地评估患者特征、初始proroc治疗方案和相关的医疗保健利用;使用Kaplan-Meier和Cox比例风险法估计临床结果。结果:获得了392例美国、296例英国和82例CA患者的数据。在最初诊断上皮性卵巢癌、输卵管癌或腹膜癌时,65.8%(美国)、93.3%(英国)和82.9% (CA)的患者为III/IV期疾病,43.6%(美国)、73.7%(英国)和56.1% (CA)的患者为高级别肿瘤。大多数患者在2013年或2014年被诊断为proroc(美国:64.8%,英国:72.3%,CA: 64.6%),美国和CA的平均proroc诊断年龄为57岁,英国为59岁。在PRROC诊断时,ECOG表现状态(PS)≤1的患者比例在美国为57.7%,在英国为80.1%,在CA为36.6%。大多数患者在PRROC诊断后接受了全身治疗(美国71.4%;英国83.1%;CA 81.7%)。大多数患者在拔牙时只接受一种治疗(美国:64.3%,英国:75.6%,CA: 70.2%)。贝伐单抗±化疗(US 41.4%;英国12.6%;CA 35.8%)和聚乙二醇化脂质体多柔比星(PLD)单药治疗(US 18.6%;英国50.0%;CA(34.3%)是最常见的初始治疗方法。常见的后续治疗因国家而异,包括拓扑替康、吉西他滨、PLD、紫杉醇。在PRROC的初始治疗期间,美国、英国和英国分别有80.7%、59.8%和44.8%的患者至少有一次办公室就诊,18.9%、7.3%和19.4%的患者至少有一次急诊科就诊。美国17.5%的患者在接受proroc初始治疗期间住院,英国10.2%,中国14.9%。治疗毒性是最常见的住院原因(美国75.5%;英国64.0%;CA 80.0%)。中位无进展生存期(PFS;95%可信区间)分别为6.4(5.4-9.3)、8.0(6.8-9.2)和5.6(4.9-6.2)个月。Cox比例风险模型显示,III/IV期、高级别肿瘤和较差的PS与较短的生存期相关。结论:尽管在这三个国家,贝伐单抗±化疗和PLD是最常见的初始PRROC治疗方法,但在美国和英国,贝伐单抗±化疗的使用率相对高于英国,这可能是由于英国缺乏贝伐单抗治疗PRROC的报销。有限的PFS和由于初始治疗观察到的治疗毒性而住院的高流行率表明,继续需要更有效和可耐受的治疗策略。引文格式:Rohan Parikh, Samantha Kurosky, Margarita Udall, Jane Chang, Joseph C. Cappelleri, Jim P. Doherty, James A. Kaye。铂难治/耐药卵巢癌患者的治疗模式和结局[摘要]。AACR会议论文集:解决卵巢癌研究和治疗中的关键问题;2017年10月1-4日;宾夕法尼亚州匹兹堡。费城(PA): AACR;临床肿瘤杂志,2018;24(15 -增刊):1 - 5。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信