Validation of fast SE-EPI T2 mapping with reference to conventional CPMG T2 mapping, and its application in prostate cancer

Min-Xiong Zhou, Ke Zan, X. Min, Liang Wang, Chao Ma, Xu Yan
{"title":"Validation of fast SE-EPI T2 mapping with reference to conventional CPMG T2 mapping, and its application in prostate cancer","authors":"Min-Xiong Zhou, Ke Zan, X. Min, Liang Wang, Chao Ma, Xu Yan","doi":"10.1109/CISP-BMEI.2017.8302183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study attempts to compare a new fast SE-EPI T2 mapping method with the conventional CPMG method, which showed potential in prostate cancer evaluation and also other applications. The SE-EPI method has advantages in faster acquisition than CPMG method and can be integrated into scan of diffusion imaging with slightly increase of acquisition time. Voxel-by-voxel and region-of-interest (ROI) based analysis were performed to compare these two methods. The result showed that the T2 values of SE-EPI method is relatively lower than those of CPMG method, while a strong correlation was found: voxel-by-voxel analysis showed that the correlation coefficient was up to 0.84; in ROI-based analysis, correlation coefficient was up to 0.87. In addition, the clinical validation showed that the T2 maps of SE-EPI at b = 0 and CPMG-based T2 have similar statistical significance in differentiating between benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer (PCa) with mean and standard deviation of 81.6 ± 13.8 vs 72.2 ± 8.5 (SE-EPI) and 108.9 ± 37.8 vs 87.5 ± 10.6 (CPMG). Thus, this work suggests that the SE-EPI method could be considered as a candidate for fast T2 mapping, and be used alone or combined with diffusion in multi-parametric analysis.","PeriodicalId":6474,"journal":{"name":"2017 10th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI)","volume":"23 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 10th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CISP-BMEI.2017.8302183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study attempts to compare a new fast SE-EPI T2 mapping method with the conventional CPMG method, which showed potential in prostate cancer evaluation and also other applications. The SE-EPI method has advantages in faster acquisition than CPMG method and can be integrated into scan of diffusion imaging with slightly increase of acquisition time. Voxel-by-voxel and region-of-interest (ROI) based analysis were performed to compare these two methods. The result showed that the T2 values of SE-EPI method is relatively lower than those of CPMG method, while a strong correlation was found: voxel-by-voxel analysis showed that the correlation coefficient was up to 0.84; in ROI-based analysis, correlation coefficient was up to 0.87. In addition, the clinical validation showed that the T2 maps of SE-EPI at b = 0 and CPMG-based T2 have similar statistical significance in differentiating between benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer (PCa) with mean and standard deviation of 81.6 ± 13.8 vs 72.2 ± 8.5 (SE-EPI) and 108.9 ± 37.8 vs 87.5 ± 10.6 (CPMG). Thus, this work suggests that the SE-EPI method could be considered as a candidate for fast T2 mapping, and be used alone or combined with diffusion in multi-parametric analysis.
快速SE-EPI T2定位与常规CPMG T2定位的验证及其在前列腺癌中的应用
本研究试图将一种新的快速SE-EPI T2定位方法与传统的CPMG方法进行比较,该方法在前列腺癌评估和其他方面具有潜在的应用前景。SE-EPI方法比CPMG方法具有更快的采集速度,可以集成到扩散成像扫描中,但采集时间略有增加。采用逐体素和基于感兴趣区域(ROI)的分析对这两种方法进行比较。结果表明,SE-EPI方法的T2值相对低于CPMG方法,但存在较强的相关性:逐体素分析显示相关系数高达0.84;在基于roi的分析中,相关系数高达0.87。此外,临床验证显示,b = 0时SE-EPI T2图谱与CPMG T2图谱对良性前列腺增生(BPH)与前列腺癌(PCa)的鉴别具有相似的统计学意义,其均值和标准差分别为81.6±13.8 vs 72.2±8.5 (SE-EPI)和108.9±37.8 vs 87.5±10.6 (CPMG)。因此,这项工作表明SE-EPI方法可以被认为是快速T2映射的候选方法,可以单独使用或与多参数分析中的扩散相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信