Aerobic training with a self-selected or predetermined intensity on sleep parameters in adolescents with obesity: a randomized clinical trial.

IF 4.2 1区工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL

Geotechnique Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5935/1984-0063.20220015

Maria Julia Lyra, Tércio Araújo do Rego Barros, Thiago Ricardo Dos Santos Tenório, Willemax Dos Santos Gomes, Antônio Henrique Germano-Soares, Ricardo Freitas-Dias, Marco Túlio De-Mello, Marcos André Moura Santos, Wagner Luiz do Prado

{"title":"Aerobic training with a self-selected or predetermined intensity on sleep parameters in adolescents with obesity: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Maria Julia Lyra, Tércio Araújo do Rego Barros, Thiago Ricardo Dos Santos Tenório, Willemax Dos Santos Gomes, Antônio Henrique Germano-Soares, Ricardo Freitas-Dias, Marco Túlio De-Mello, Marcos André Moura Santos, Wagner Luiz do Prado","doi":"10.5935/1984-0063.20220015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To compare the effects of self-selected and predetermined intensity on sleep quality and duration, daytime sleepiness, and sleep efficiency of adolescents with obesity after 12 weeks of aerobic training.Material and methods: Thirty-seven adolescents (12 girls), 13-18 years old, with obesity (BMI = 95th) were randomized into a predetermined intensity group (PIG), exercise intensity around 60-70% of heart rate reserve; or self-selected intensity group (SIG), the adolescents chose the speed/intensity at the beginning of each session and were able to change it every 5 minutes. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) were used to assess sleep outcomes.Results: No differences were observed for PSQI [0.00 ± 2.00 vs 1.38 ± 2.7; p=0.195; d=0.60 (moderate effect)], sleep duration [-0.95 ± 1.2 vs -0.35 ± 1.6; p=0.358; d=0.41 (small effect)], ESS [(2.10 ± 3.9 vs 1.15 ± 4.5; p=0.195; d=0.23 (small effect)], and sleep efficiency [(81.5 ± 24.0 vs 79.4 ± 17.0; p=0.8.14; d=0.10 (trivial effect)] for the PIG and SIG groups, respectively.Conclusion: Aerobic training at a self- selected or predetermined intensity does not modulate sleep quality, sleep duration and efficiency, and daytime sleepiness, independent of intensity.","PeriodicalId":55098,"journal":{"name":"Geotechnique","volume":"14 1","pages":"156-163"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8889977/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geotechnique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1984-0063.20220015","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the effects of self-selected and predetermined intensity on sleep quality and duration, daytime sleepiness, and sleep efficiency of adolescents with obesity after 12 weeks of aerobic training.

Material and methods: Thirty-seven adolescents (12 girls), 13-18 years old, with obesity (BMI = 95th) were randomized into a predetermined intensity group (PIG), exercise intensity around 60-70% of heart rate reserve; or self-selected intensity group (SIG), the adolescents chose the speed/intensity at the beginning of each session and were able to change it every 5 minutes. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) were used to assess sleep outcomes.

Results: No differences were observed for PSQI [0.00 ± 2.00 vs 1.38 ± 2.7; p=0.195; d=0.60 (moderate effect)], sleep duration [-0.95 ± 1.2 vs -0.35 ± 1.6; p=0.358; d=0.41 (small effect)], ESS [(2.10 ± 3.9 vs 1.15 ± 4.5; p=0.195; d=0.23 (small effect)], and sleep efficiency [(81.5 ± 24.0 vs 79.4 ± 17.0; p=0.8.14; d=0.10 (trivial effect)] for the PIG and SIG groups, respectively.

Conclusion: Aerobic training at a self- selected or predetermined intensity does not modulate sleep quality, sleep duration and efficiency, and daytime sleepiness, independent of intensity.

查看原文本刊更多论文

自选或预定强度的有氧训练对肥胖青少年睡眠参数的影响：随机临床试验。

目的比较自我选择强度和预定强度对肥胖青少年进行 12 周有氧训练后的睡眠质量和持续时间、白天嗜睡和睡眠效率的影响：37名13-18岁的肥胖青少年（12名女生）（体重指数=95）被随机分为预定强度组（PIG）和自选强度组（SIG），预定强度组的运动强度约为心率储备的60-70%；自选强度组的运动强度为每节课开始时的速度/强度，青少年可以每5分钟改变一次。匹兹堡睡眠质量指数（PSQI）和埃普沃斯嗜睡量表（ESS）用于评估睡眠结果：结果：匹兹堡睡眠质量指数[0.00 ± 2.00 vs 1.38 ± 2.7; p=0.195; d=0.60（中等效应）]、睡眠持续时间[-0.95 ± 1.2 vs -0.35 ± 1.6; p=0.358; d=0.41（小效应）]、ESS[（2.10±3.9 vs 1.15±4.5；p=0.195；d=0.23（小效应）]，PIG组和SIG组的睡眠效率[（81.5±24.0 vs 79.4±17.0；p=0.8.14；d=0.10（微小效应）]分别为-0.95±1.2 vs -0.35±1.6；p=0.358；d=0.41（小效应）]：结论：自选或预定强度的有氧训练不会调节睡眠质量、睡眠时间和效率以及白天嗜睡，与强度无关。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Geotechnique 工程技术-地球科学综合

CiteScore

9.80

自引率

10.30%

发文量

168

审稿时长

7 months

期刊介绍： Established in 1948, Géotechnique is the world''s premier geotechnics journal, publishing research of the highest quality on all aspects of geotechnical engineering. Géotechnique provides access to rigorously refereed, current, innovative and authoritative research and practical papers, across the fields of soil and rock mechanics, engineering geology and environmental geotechnics.