Equal Opportunities in Educational Management in Institutions of Higher Learning: An Agenda for Gender

Zambezia Pub Date : 2004-09-20 DOI:10.4314/ZJH.V30I1.6733
L. Chipunza
{"title":"Equal Opportunities in Educational Management in Institutions of Higher Learning: An Agenda for Gender","authors":"L. Chipunza","doi":"10.4314/ZJH.V30I1.6733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the issue of gender disparities within education which have been long standing in many parts of the world. The discussion centres on the need for educational management boards to balance the selection and ranking of administrative-cum-managerial staff by practising non discrimination and by ensuring equal rights in the appropriate steps to higher positions of management, based on the notion of meritocracy and gender representation. Relevant examples have been drawn from the Zimbabwean context. Concerns about gender disparities within education have been long standing in many parts of the world (Davies 1990, Dorsey et al 1989, Gray 1989, Shakeshaft 1887, Saint 1992). Major differences of status and position, have divided men and women teachers throughout. Recently, the issue of equity in educational administration has become of increasing concern to educational policy makers, especially in developing countries. For example, in a review of the national planning documents of a number of countries, Davies (1990) found that inequality in the workplace was a key consideration of their governments. As she noted, although most developing countries refer to equality and egalitarianism in their policy documents, they have done very little to fulfil these noble objectives. In Zimbabwe, for instance, teaching has remained a male dominated profession, as shown by the fact that at 2003, the 15% women secondary school heads in the country were drawn from only 42% women secondary school teachers. The figures at primary school level were even more disproportionate, with only 5% of the school heads being female, drawn from a 50% female teaching force nationwide (Zimbabwe Government 1994). Within the organisational structures and processes of the educational institutions themselves, gender plays a much larger role than is often realised. Indeed, until recently when women began to speak out loudly about their concerns about being marginalised, gender issues in education in the developing countries remained largely un-addressed and, therefore, unresolved. Because of the growing agitation of the issues by women, it is no longer possible for governments to ignore them. That the marginalisation","PeriodicalId":83564,"journal":{"name":"Zambezia","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zambezia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ZJH.V30I1.6733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The article discusses the issue of gender disparities within education which have been long standing in many parts of the world. The discussion centres on the need for educational management boards to balance the selection and ranking of administrative-cum-managerial staff by practising non discrimination and by ensuring equal rights in the appropriate steps to higher positions of management, based on the notion of meritocracy and gender representation. Relevant examples have been drawn from the Zimbabwean context. Concerns about gender disparities within education have been long standing in many parts of the world (Davies 1990, Dorsey et al 1989, Gray 1989, Shakeshaft 1887, Saint 1992). Major differences of status and position, have divided men and women teachers throughout. Recently, the issue of equity in educational administration has become of increasing concern to educational policy makers, especially in developing countries. For example, in a review of the national planning documents of a number of countries, Davies (1990) found that inequality in the workplace was a key consideration of their governments. As she noted, although most developing countries refer to equality and egalitarianism in their policy documents, they have done very little to fulfil these noble objectives. In Zimbabwe, for instance, teaching has remained a male dominated profession, as shown by the fact that at 2003, the 15% women secondary school heads in the country were drawn from only 42% women secondary school teachers. The figures at primary school level were even more disproportionate, with only 5% of the school heads being female, drawn from a 50% female teaching force nationwide (Zimbabwe Government 1994). Within the organisational structures and processes of the educational institutions themselves, gender plays a much larger role than is often realised. Indeed, until recently when women began to speak out loudly about their concerns about being marginalised, gender issues in education in the developing countries remained largely un-addressed and, therefore, unresolved. Because of the growing agitation of the issues by women, it is no longer possible for governments to ignore them. That the marginalisation
高等学校教育管理中的机会平等:一个性别议题
本文讨论了在世界许多地区长期存在的教育中的性别差异问题。讨论的重点是教育管理委员会需要在行政和管理工作人员的选择和排名方面取得平衡,办法是实行不歧视,并根据精英管理和性别代表性的概念,确保在适当步骤中获得更高的管理职位的平等权利。已从津巴布韦的情况中举出了有关的例子。对教育中的性别差异的关注在世界许多地方已经存在了很长时间(Davies 1990, Dorsey et al . 1989, Gray 1989, Shakeshaft 1887, Saint 1992)。男女教师在地位和职位上的重大差异,使男女教师始终处于分裂状态。最近,教育行政公平问题日益成为教育决策者,特别是发展中国家教育决策者所关注的问题。例如,在回顾一些国家的国家规划文件时,Davies(1990)发现,工作场所的不平等是他们政府的一个关键考虑因素。她指出,虽然大多数发展中国家在其政策文件中提到平等和平等主义,但它们在实现这些崇高目标方面做得很少。例如,在津巴布韦,教学仍然是男性主导的职业,这一事实表明,2003年,该国15%的女中学校长来自仅42%的女中学教师。小学一级的数字更不成比例,在全国50%的女性教师队伍中,只有5%的校长是女性(津巴布韦政府,1994年)。在教育机构本身的组织结构和过程中,性别所起的作用比通常认识到的要大得多。事实上,直到最近妇女开始大声说出她们对被边缘化的关切时,发展中国家教育中的性别问题在很大程度上仍然没有得到解决,因此也没有得到解决。由于妇女日益关注这些问题,政府再也不可能忽视这些问题。这就是边缘化
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书