The Ethical Dimension of Professional Integrity in the Hungarian Child Protection System

Ernő Bogács, Andrea Rácz
{"title":"The Ethical Dimension of Professional Integrity in the Hungarian Child Protection System","authors":"Ernő Bogács, Andrea Rácz","doi":"10.2478/aussoc-2018-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Following a discussion about ethics and social work, in this article, we will present the main results of three researches conducted in the past few years on the Hungarian child protection system. These studies highlight the professional gaps, the prejudiced beliefs related to the primary (children) and secondary (parents) client systems of child protection, the value crisis in professional mentalities, and the crisis of the profession in general. We argue that a change in mentalities and professional treatment in the operational practice requires a thorough reconsideration of the ethical dimensions of child protection to the extent of developing and introducing their own code of ethics. As the helping profession is actively involved in the transformation of the welfare state, in parallel with restructuring welfare conditions, we should reconsider how the scarce methodological framework for practice at the national level can cope with problems and how it can emancipate the clients and serve their well-being. The research results indicate that the direction of development is to create an activating and mobilizing helper system that can preserve the core values of the profession as well as adapt to social changes and reflect on the expectations of the public policy thereof.","PeriodicalId":30433,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Social Analysis","volume":"8 1","pages":"75 - 89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Social Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/aussoc-2018-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Following a discussion about ethics and social work, in this article, we will present the main results of three researches conducted in the past few years on the Hungarian child protection system. These studies highlight the professional gaps, the prejudiced beliefs related to the primary (children) and secondary (parents) client systems of child protection, the value crisis in professional mentalities, and the crisis of the profession in general. We argue that a change in mentalities and professional treatment in the operational practice requires a thorough reconsideration of the ethical dimensions of child protection to the extent of developing and introducing their own code of ethics. As the helping profession is actively involved in the transformation of the welfare state, in parallel with restructuring welfare conditions, we should reconsider how the scarce methodological framework for practice at the national level can cope with problems and how it can emancipate the clients and serve their well-being. The research results indicate that the direction of development is to create an activating and mobilizing helper system that can preserve the core values of the profession as well as adapt to social changes and reflect on the expectations of the public policy thereof.
匈牙利儿童保护制度中职业操守的伦理层面
在讨论了伦理和社会工作之后,在本文中,我们将介绍在过去几年中对匈牙利儿童保护系统进行的三项研究的主要结果。这些研究突出了专业差距,与儿童保护的主要(儿童)和次要(父母)客户系统相关的偏见信念,专业心态的价值危机以及整个行业的危机。我们认为,在操作实践中,心态和专业待遇的改变需要对儿童保护的道德层面进行彻底的重新考虑,以制定和引入他们自己的道德准则。在福利国家转型的同时,帮助行业也在积极参与福利状况的重构,我们应该重新思考稀缺的国家层面实践方法框架如何应对问题,如何解放受助者,为他们的福祉服务。研究结果表明,未来的发展方向是创建一个既能保持行业核心价值,又能适应社会变化和反映公共政策期望的激活性和动员性帮助者体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信