From rejection to acknowledgement and dispute: four moments in the origins of Chilean representative democracy, 1822–1851

IF 0.6 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
M. Casals, Andrés Estefane, Juan Luis Ossa
{"title":"From rejection to acknowledgement and dispute: four moments in the origins of Chilean representative democracy, 1822–1851","authors":"M. Casals, Andrés Estefane, Juan Luis Ossa","doi":"10.1080/14701847.2020.1789374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article traces the changes in the meanings and uses of the concept of democracy in Chile in the period 1822–1851. Based on an extensive revision of newspapers, it shows how the idea of democracy evolved from a negative understanding of it to an increasingly positive vision that saw it as a key mechanism for legitimising political power. Essential for this transition were, first, the doctrinal disputes of the 1820s, which established a series of liberal and republican principles that ended up being constituent characteristics of Chilean democracy. Second, the concept of representation, which by normalising a way of exercising power through delegates democratically elected, allowed to cleanse democracy from what contemporaries considered its most menacing excesses. The article identifies four moments of progress and retreats of democracy during the first half of the nineteenth century, demonstrating the extent to which this was a more complex process than what is commonly believed. In so doing, it aims to question some of the general assumptions about the origins of democracy both in Latin America and Chile and to demonstrate how the acknowledgement of the idea of representative democracy was one of the main legacies of these seminal debates for nineteenth-century Chilean politics.","PeriodicalId":53911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Iberian and Latin American Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"159 - 173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Iberian and Latin American Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14701847.2020.1789374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article traces the changes in the meanings and uses of the concept of democracy in Chile in the period 1822–1851. Based on an extensive revision of newspapers, it shows how the idea of democracy evolved from a negative understanding of it to an increasingly positive vision that saw it as a key mechanism for legitimising political power. Essential for this transition were, first, the doctrinal disputes of the 1820s, which established a series of liberal and republican principles that ended up being constituent characteristics of Chilean democracy. Second, the concept of representation, which by normalising a way of exercising power through delegates democratically elected, allowed to cleanse democracy from what contemporaries considered its most menacing excesses. The article identifies four moments of progress and retreats of democracy during the first half of the nineteenth century, demonstrating the extent to which this was a more complex process than what is commonly believed. In so doing, it aims to question some of the general assumptions about the origins of democracy both in Latin America and Chile and to demonstrate how the acknowledgement of the idea of representative democracy was one of the main legacies of these seminal debates for nineteenth-century Chilean politics.
从拒绝到承认和争论:智利代议制民主起源的四个时刻,1822-1851
本文追溯了1822-1851年间智利民主概念的含义和用法的变化。基于对报纸的广泛修订,本书展示了民主的概念是如何从一种消极的理解演变为一种日益积极的观点,将其视为政治权力合法化的关键机制。对这一转变至关重要的是,首先,19世纪20年代的教义争论,它确立了一系列自由和共和原则,最终成为智利民主的组成特征。其次,代议制的概念使民主选举产生的代表行使权力的方式正常化,从而使民主摆脱了同时代人认为最具威胁性的过度行为。这篇文章指出了19世纪上半叶民主进步和倒退的四个时刻,表明这是一个比人们普遍认为的更复杂的过程。在这样做的过程中,它的目的是质疑一些关于拉丁美洲和智利民主起源的一般假设,并证明对代议制民主思想的承认是19世纪智利政治的这些开创性辩论的主要遗产之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Iberian and Latin American Studies
Journal of Iberian and Latin American Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信