Chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer - a single institution retrospective review.

Q4 Medicine
Z. Pechacova, R. Lohynská, Zdenka Weitoschová, M. Zikan, Oľga Dubová, V. Tomancová, E. Kmoníčková, M. Pala, T. Drbohlavová
{"title":"Chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer - a single institution retrospective review.","authors":"Z. Pechacova, R. Lohynská, Zdenka Weitoschová, M. Zikan, Oľga Dubová, V. Tomancová, E. Kmoníčková, M. Pala, T. Drbohlavová","doi":"10.48095/ccko2022139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND The aim of this study is a retrospective analysis of treatment outcomes and toxicity in a group of patients with cervical cancer who underwent (chemo) radiotherapy at the Institute of Radiation Oncology in Bulovka University Hospital in Prague in the period 2014-2017. PATIENTS AND METHODS During this period, 141 patients were treated, 105 (74.5%) of them underwent combined (chemo) radiotherapy with radical intent and palliative radiotherapy was performed in 36 (25.5%) cases. According to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 classification, the most numerous stages were IIB in 39 (27.7%) and IIIB in 64 (45.4%) cases; according to FIGO 2018, a significant number of newly established stages is evident: IIIC1 in 55 (39.0%) patients and IIIC2 in 22 (15.6%) cases. RESULTS The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) reached 31.3, resp. 40.1 months in the whole group. In the subgroup of patients treated with radical intent, the median PFS was 44.0 months and OS 48.8 months; in the palliative subgroup, the median PFS was 9.4 months and OS 14.8 months. In a radically treated subgroup, 7 (6.7%) patients had gastrointestinal or genitourinary manifestations of G3-4 toxicity, and overall acute toxicity (including skin and haematological reactions) of G3-4 occurred in 18 (17.1%) patients. Late toxicity of G3-4 was reported in 13 (12.4%) cases. Patients who underwent complete brachytherapy (BRT) showed significantly better survival compared to patients with a lower number of BRT fractions. The prognostic potential of PS (performance status) and anemia was confirmed; significantly longer overall survival was observed in patients in good general condition or in those without anemia. CONCLUSION Our results confirmed the key role of BRT for the delivery of the curative dose to the target volume. The prognostic role of PS and anemia is evident. The side effects were in acceptable limits but we expect improvements because of the use of modern radiotherapy technologies.","PeriodicalId":35565,"journal":{"name":"Klinicka Onkologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klinicka Onkologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48095/ccko2022139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

BACKGROUND The aim of this study is a retrospective analysis of treatment outcomes and toxicity in a group of patients with cervical cancer who underwent (chemo) radiotherapy at the Institute of Radiation Oncology in Bulovka University Hospital in Prague in the period 2014-2017. PATIENTS AND METHODS During this period, 141 patients were treated, 105 (74.5%) of them underwent combined (chemo) radiotherapy with radical intent and palliative radiotherapy was performed in 36 (25.5%) cases. According to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 classification, the most numerous stages were IIB in 39 (27.7%) and IIIB in 64 (45.4%) cases; according to FIGO 2018, a significant number of newly established stages is evident: IIIC1 in 55 (39.0%) patients and IIIC2 in 22 (15.6%) cases. RESULTS The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) reached 31.3, resp. 40.1 months in the whole group. In the subgroup of patients treated with radical intent, the median PFS was 44.0 months and OS 48.8 months; in the palliative subgroup, the median PFS was 9.4 months and OS 14.8 months. In a radically treated subgroup, 7 (6.7%) patients had gastrointestinal or genitourinary manifestations of G3-4 toxicity, and overall acute toxicity (including skin and haematological reactions) of G3-4 occurred in 18 (17.1%) patients. Late toxicity of G3-4 was reported in 13 (12.4%) cases. Patients who underwent complete brachytherapy (BRT) showed significantly better survival compared to patients with a lower number of BRT fractions. The prognostic potential of PS (performance status) and anemia was confirmed; significantly longer overall survival was observed in patients in good general condition or in those without anemia. CONCLUSION Our results confirmed the key role of BRT for the delivery of the curative dose to the target volume. The prognostic role of PS and anemia is evident. The side effects were in acceptable limits but we expect improvements because of the use of modern radiotherapy technologies.
放化疗治疗子宫颈癌-单机构回顾性评价。
本研究的目的是回顾性分析2014-2017年期间在布拉格Bulovka大学医院放射肿瘤学研究所接受(化疗)放疗的一组宫颈癌患者的治疗结果和毒性。患者与方法本组共收治141例患者,其中105例(74.5%)行根治性联合化疗,36例(25.5%)行姑息性放疗。根据国际妇产科联合会(FIGO) 2009年的分类,最多的分期是IIB 39例(27.7%)和IIIB 64例(45.4%);根据FIGO 2018,新建立的阶段数量明显增加:55例(39.0%)患者为IIIC1阶段,22例(15.6%)患者为IIIC2阶段。结果中位无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)分别为31.3。40.1个月。在接受根治治疗的患者亚组中,中位PFS为44.0个月,OS为48.8个月;在姑息治疗亚组,中位PFS为9.4个月,OS为14.8个月。在根治亚组中,7例(6.7%)患者出现胃肠道或泌尿生殖系统的G3-4毒性表现,18例(17.1%)患者出现G3-4的全面急性毒性(包括皮肤和血液学反应)。13例(12.4%)报告G3-4的晚期毒性。接受完全近距离放射治疗(BRT)的患者与接受BRT分数较低的患者相比,显着提高了生存率。确认运动状态(PS)和贫血的预后潜力;在一般情况良好或无贫血的患者中,观察到明显较长的总生存期。结论我们的研究结果证实了BRT在将治疗剂量递送到目标体积方面的关键作用。PS和贫血的预后作用是显而易见的。副作用在可接受的范围内,但由于使用现代放射治疗技术,我们期望得到改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Klinicka Onkologie
Klinicka Onkologie Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信