Readiness of Forest Officers for Adaptations in Forest Management Planning

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
C. Hartebrodt, J. Schmitt
{"title":"Readiness of Forest Officers for Adaptations in Forest Management Planning","authors":"C. Hartebrodt, J. Schmitt","doi":"10.1515/aslh-2016-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Under the framework of a society that enhances the demand for different kinds of ecosystem services, “Forest Management Planning” (FMP) has changed notably over the last decades. As a consequence of budget constraints and the fact that the present forest planning system of the State Forest Administration of Baden-Württemberg has been in operation since 2000, this system has to be developed further. Since the group of forest officers at the county level is the largest user group, it was decided to start a participatory process in order to derive the most relevant requirements of that group. A survey within the board of managing directors followed. In order to gain an insight into the requirements and preferences we used the pairwise comparison method. The paper highlights the preference structure in respect to (1) the goals of FMP, (2) target groups, (3) the FMP process, (4) tasks, (5) and the outputs of FMP. It can be shown that the average percipience of FMP of forest officers tends to be more traditional and internal than proactive and stakeholder-oriented. The pairwise comparison approach has been proven successful as a means to get insight in the preference structures.","PeriodicalId":53620,"journal":{"name":"Acta Silvatica et Lignaria Hungarica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Silvatica et Lignaria Hungarica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/aslh-2016-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Under the framework of a society that enhances the demand for different kinds of ecosystem services, “Forest Management Planning” (FMP) has changed notably over the last decades. As a consequence of budget constraints and the fact that the present forest planning system of the State Forest Administration of Baden-Württemberg has been in operation since 2000, this system has to be developed further. Since the group of forest officers at the county level is the largest user group, it was decided to start a participatory process in order to derive the most relevant requirements of that group. A survey within the board of managing directors followed. In order to gain an insight into the requirements and preferences we used the pairwise comparison method. The paper highlights the preference structure in respect to (1) the goals of FMP, (2) target groups, (3) the FMP process, (4) tasks, (5) and the outputs of FMP. It can be shown that the average percipience of FMP of forest officers tends to be more traditional and internal than proactive and stakeholder-oriented. The pairwise comparison approach has been proven successful as a means to get insight in the preference structures.
森林官员适应森林管理规划的准备
摘要在社会对各种生态系统服务需求不断增加的背景下,“森林管理规划”(FMP)在过去几十年发生了显著变化。由于预算限制和巴登-符腾堡州国家林业局目前的森林规划系统自2000年以来一直在运行,因此必须进一步发展这一系统。由于县一级的森林官员群体是最大的用户群体,因此决定开始一个参与性进程,以便得出该群体最相关的需求。随后在董事会内部进行了一项调查。为了深入了解需求和偏好,我们使用了两两比较方法。本文强调了以下方面的偏好结构:(1)FMP的目标,(2)目标群体,(3)FMP过程,(4)任务,(5)和FMP的输出。可以表明,森林官员对森林资源管理方案的平均认识往往是传统的和内部的,而不是主动的和面向利益相关者的。两两比较方法作为一种深入了解偏好结构的方法已被证明是成功的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Silvatica et Lignaria Hungarica
Acta Silvatica et Lignaria Hungarica Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信