They Would do Better if They Worked Together: The Case of Interaction Problems Between Password Managers and Websites

Nicolas Huaman, Sabrina Amft, Marten Oltrogge, Y. Acar, S. Fahl
{"title":"They Would do Better if They Worked Together: The Case of Interaction Problems Between Password Managers and Websites","authors":"Nicolas Huaman, Sabrina Amft, Marten Oltrogge, Y. Acar, S. Fahl","doi":"10.1109/SP40001.2021.00094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Password managers are tools to support users with the secure generation and storage of credentials and logins used in online accounts. Previous work illustrated that building password managers means facing various security and usability challenges. For strong security and good usability, the interaction between password managers and websites needs to be smooth and effortless. However, user reviews for popular password managers suggest interaction problems for some websites. Therefore, to the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to systematically identify these interaction problems and investigate how 15 desktop password managers, including the ten most popular ones, are affected. We use a qualitative analysis approach to identify 39 interaction problems from 2,947 user reviews and 372 GitHub issues for 30 password managers. Next, we implement minimal working examples (MWEs) for all interaction problems we found and evaluate them for all password managers in 585 test cases.Our results illustrate that a) password managers struggle to correctly implement authentication features such as HTTP Basic Authentication and modern standards such as the autocomplete-attribute and b) websites fail to implement clean and well-structured authentication forms. We conclude that some of our findings can be addressed by either PWM providers or web-developers by adhering to already existing standards, recommendations and best practices, while other cases are currently almost impossible to implement securely and require further research.","PeriodicalId":6786,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)","volume":"62 1","pages":"1367-1381"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SP40001.2021.00094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Password managers are tools to support users with the secure generation and storage of credentials and logins used in online accounts. Previous work illustrated that building password managers means facing various security and usability challenges. For strong security and good usability, the interaction between password managers and websites needs to be smooth and effortless. However, user reviews for popular password managers suggest interaction problems for some websites. Therefore, to the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to systematically identify these interaction problems and investigate how 15 desktop password managers, including the ten most popular ones, are affected. We use a qualitative analysis approach to identify 39 interaction problems from 2,947 user reviews and 372 GitHub issues for 30 password managers. Next, we implement minimal working examples (MWEs) for all interaction problems we found and evaluate them for all password managers in 585 test cases.Our results illustrate that a) password managers struggle to correctly implement authentication features such as HTTP Basic Authentication and modern standards such as the autocomplete-attribute and b) websites fail to implement clean and well-structured authentication forms. We conclude that some of our findings can be addressed by either PWM providers or web-developers by adhering to already existing standards, recommendations and best practices, while other cases are currently almost impossible to implement securely and require further research.
如果他们一起工作,他们会做得更好:密码管理器和网站之间的交互问题的案例
密码管理器是支持用户安全生成和存储在线帐户中使用的凭据和登录的工具。以前的工作表明,构建密码管理器意味着面临各种安全性和可用性挑战。为了获得较强的安全性和良好的可用性,密码管理器与网站之间的交互需要流畅和轻松。然而,用户对流行密码管理器的评论表明,一些网站存在交互问题。因此,据我们所知,这项工作是第一个系统地识别这些交互问题,并调查15个桌面密码管理器,包括10个最流行的,是如何受到影响的。我们使用定性分析方法从2947个用户评论和372个GitHub问题中确定了30个密码管理器的39个交互问题。接下来,我们为发现的所有交互问题实现最小工作示例(MWEs),并在585个测试用例中对所有密码管理器进行评估。我们的研究结果表明,a)密码管理器难以正确实现身份验证功能,如HTTP基本身份验证和现代标准,如自动完成属性;b)网站未能实现干净、结构良好的身份验证表单。我们的结论是,我们的一些发现可以由PWM提供商或web开发人员通过遵循现有的标准、建议和最佳实践来解决,而其他情况目前几乎不可能安全实现,需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信