Misinformation, social status and ridicule: A study of how Danes spread and react to Covid-19 misinformation on Twitter

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY
Cathrine Valentin Kjær, Nicklas Johansen, S. Marjanovic, R. Baglini, Rebecca Adler-Nissen
{"title":"Misinformation, social status and ridicule: A study of how Danes spread and react to Covid-19 misinformation on Twitter","authors":"Cathrine Valentin Kjær, Nicklas Johansen, S. Marjanovic, R. Baglini, Rebecca Adler-Nissen","doi":"10.7146/politica.v54i2.132526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How do Danes interact with misinformation on social media? Which statements and arguments do they use to spread and reject misinformation? We investigate digital misinformation during the Covid-19 pandemic and analyze how citizens spread and reject information about facemasks on Twitter in Denmark. Our study shows that the amount of misinformation is limited, but that false claims are not predominantly countered through fact-checking or dialogue. Instead, users who reject the misinformation often use irony and condescending comments to distance themselves from those who spread misinformation and whose concerns are thus not taken seriously. Our findings question citizens’ ability to effectively correct misinformation online and point to the importance of group affiliation and social status not only in spreading, but also in rejecting digital misinformation. \nKeywords: Covid-19, humor, misinformation, social status, Twitter","PeriodicalId":40761,"journal":{"name":"Filosofia Politica","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filosofia Politica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v54i2.132526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How do Danes interact with misinformation on social media? Which statements and arguments do they use to spread and reject misinformation? We investigate digital misinformation during the Covid-19 pandemic and analyze how citizens spread and reject information about facemasks on Twitter in Denmark. Our study shows that the amount of misinformation is limited, but that false claims are not predominantly countered through fact-checking or dialogue. Instead, users who reject the misinformation often use irony and condescending comments to distance themselves from those who spread misinformation and whose concerns are thus not taken seriously. Our findings question citizens’ ability to effectively correct misinformation online and point to the importance of group affiliation and social status not only in spreading, but also in rejecting digital misinformation. Keywords: Covid-19, humor, misinformation, social status, Twitter
错误信息、社会地位和嘲笑:丹麦人如何在推特上传播和应对新冠肺炎错误信息的研究
丹麦人如何应对社交媒体上的错误信息?他们用哪些陈述和论点来传播和拒绝错误信息?我们调查了2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的数字错误信息,并分析了丹麦公民如何在Twitter上传播和拒绝有关口罩的信息。我们的研究表明,错误信息的数量是有限的,但虚假声明并不主要是通过事实核查或对话来反击的。相反,拒绝错误信息的用户经常使用讽刺和居高临下的评论来与传播错误信息的人保持距离,因此这些人的担忧没有得到重视。我们的研究结果质疑公民有效纠正网络错误信息的能力,并指出群体归属和社会地位不仅在传播方面很重要,而且在拒绝数字错误信息方面也很重要。关键词:新冠肺炎,幽默,错误信息,社会地位,推特
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Filosofia Politica
Filosofia Politica PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信