Revisiting Mary O’Brien – Reproductive Consciousness and Liquid Maternity

IF 0.7 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Socialist Studies Pub Date : 2014-08-08 DOI:10.18740/S4VC72
A. Burfoot
{"title":"Revisiting Mary O’Brien – Reproductive Consciousness and Liquid Maternity","authors":"A. Burfoot","doi":"10.18740/S4VC72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research note examines feminist theory from socialist feminism through the post-structural turn associated with thinkers like Foucault, Derrida and Butler to neo-materialism, this last noted for its emphasis on the body's materiality as opposed to the subject as a socially constructed or merely linguistic practice. Tracing these theoretical developments is contextualized with respect to theories and concepts such as feminist standpoint theories of epistemology, historical materialism and Baumann's \"liquid modernity\". I ask: have we lost sight of the strength of feminist structuralism - particularly the effects of capital - in order to accommodate multiple and complex subjectifications associated with gender? Mary O'Brien's reproductive consciousness, her argument that women's consciousness is fundamentally shaped through the different moments related to reproduction, is re-examined in light of recent developments in egg donation and surrogacy. This is not intended as an exercise in romantic longing for some sort of utopian society where femininity is venerated. Rather, it is an exploration of the potential for reproductive consciousness to guide political responses to contemporary problems raised by new reproductive technologies that combine capital and gender in a single dialectic.","PeriodicalId":29667,"journal":{"name":"Socialist Studies","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socialist Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18740/S4VC72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This research note examines feminist theory from socialist feminism through the post-structural turn associated with thinkers like Foucault, Derrida and Butler to neo-materialism, this last noted for its emphasis on the body's materiality as opposed to the subject as a socially constructed or merely linguistic practice. Tracing these theoretical developments is contextualized with respect to theories and concepts such as feminist standpoint theories of epistemology, historical materialism and Baumann's "liquid modernity". I ask: have we lost sight of the strength of feminist structuralism - particularly the effects of capital - in order to accommodate multiple and complex subjectifications associated with gender? Mary O'Brien's reproductive consciousness, her argument that women's consciousness is fundamentally shaped through the different moments related to reproduction, is re-examined in light of recent developments in egg donation and surrogacy. This is not intended as an exercise in romantic longing for some sort of utopian society where femininity is venerated. Rather, it is an exploration of the potential for reproductive consciousness to guide political responses to contemporary problems raised by new reproductive technologies that combine capital and gender in a single dialectic.
重访玛丽·奥布莱恩——生殖意识和液态母性
本研究报告考察了女权主义理论,从社会主义女权主义到后结构转向,与福柯、德里达和巴特勒等思想家有关,再到新唯物主义,新唯物主义强调身体的物质性,而不是主体作为社会建构或仅仅是语言实践。对这些理论发展的追踪是在认识论的女权主义立场理论、历史唯物主义和鲍曼的“流动现代性”等理论和概念的背景下进行的。我问:为了适应与性别相关的多重复杂的主体化,我们是否忽视了女权主义结构主义的力量——尤其是资本的影响?玛丽·奥布莱恩的生殖意识,她认为女性的意识从根本上是通过与生殖相关的不同时刻形成的,根据卵子捐赠和代孕的最新发展,她的观点被重新审视。这并不是一种对某种乌托邦社会的浪漫向往,在那里女性受到尊重。相反,它是对生殖意识的潜力的探索,以指导对新的生殖技术提出的当代问题的政治反应,这些技术将资本和性别结合在一个单一的辩证法中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信