Identifying vowels in CVC syllables: effects of inserting silence and noise.

Randy L. Diehl, E. Parker
{"title":"Identifying vowels in CVC syllables: effects of inserting silence and noise.","authors":"Randy L. Diehl, E. Parker","doi":"10.1121/1.2019140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Listeners were asked to identify natural vowels in /d_d/ context under various deletion conditions. Deletion intervals, which were centered about the syllable midpoint, ranged from 60% to 90% of the syllable duration and contained either silence or broadband noise. In one condition, the three syllable types were /did/, /ded/, and /dud/; in the other condition, the three syllable types were /did/, /ded/, and/dAdV. Identification performance in the 60% and 70% deletion conditions was not substantially worse than for full syllables. Even the 90% deletion conditions yielded performance well above chance, indicating that significant coarticulatory information for vowels is contained in the first and last 10 or 15 msec of the syllable. For the short-vowel stimuli (/did/, /d∈d/, and /dλV) in the 90% deletion condition, a series of discriminant analyses were performed to assess the relative contribution of several acoustic variables to the statistical separation of the vowel categories. Several different combinations of acoustic variables (including formant frequencies at particular temporal locations and formant frequency differences over time) were sufficient to yield significant separation of the three vowel categories. However, in general, the performance of the discriminant classification program correlated only weakly with the identification performance of the listeners.","PeriodicalId":19838,"journal":{"name":"Perception & Psychophysics","volume":"29 1","pages":"369-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perception & Psychophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2019140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Listeners were asked to identify natural vowels in /d_d/ context under various deletion conditions. Deletion intervals, which were centered about the syllable midpoint, ranged from 60% to 90% of the syllable duration and contained either silence or broadband noise. In one condition, the three syllable types were /did/, /ded/, and /dud/; in the other condition, the three syllable types were /did/, /ded/, and/dAdV. Identification performance in the 60% and 70% deletion conditions was not substantially worse than for full syllables. Even the 90% deletion conditions yielded performance well above chance, indicating that significant coarticulatory information for vowels is contained in the first and last 10 or 15 msec of the syllable. For the short-vowel stimuli (/did/, /d∈d/, and /dλV) in the 90% deletion condition, a series of discriminant analyses were performed to assess the relative contribution of several acoustic variables to the statistical separation of the vowel categories. Several different combinations of acoustic variables (including formant frequencies at particular temporal locations and formant frequency differences over time) were sufficient to yield significant separation of the three vowel categories. However, in general, the performance of the discriminant classification program correlated only weakly with the identification performance of the listeners.
识别CVC音节中的元音:插入沉默和噪音的影响。
听众被要求在不同的删除条件下识别/d_d/上下文中的自然元音。删除间隔以音节中点为中心,范围为音节持续时间的60%至90%,包含沉默或宽带噪声。在一种情况下,三种音节类型是/did/, /ded/和/dud/;在另一种情况下,三个音节类型是/did/, /ded/和/dAdV。在60%和70%的删除条件下,识别性能并不明显比完整音节差。即使是90%的删除条件也产生了高于概率的表现,这表明元音的重要协同发音信息包含在音节的前10秒和后10秒或15秒中。对于短元音刺激(/did/, /d∈d/和/dλV)在90%缺失条件下,进行了一系列判别分析,以评估几个声学变量对元音类别统计分离的相对贡献。几种不同的声学变量组合(包括特定时间位置的形成峰频率和随时间变化的形成峰频率差异)足以产生三种元音类别的显著分离。然而,总的来说,判别分类程序的性能与听众的识别性能相关性很弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信