Éclairage par le commun des conditions organisationnelles pour la pérennité des communautés de pratique

IF 0.4 4区 管理学 Q4 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Kévin Pastier, Victor Combes, M. Dalmas, F. Silva
{"title":"Éclairage par le commun des conditions organisationnelles pour la pérennité des communautés de pratique","authors":"Kévin Pastier, Victor Combes, M. Dalmas, F. Silva","doi":"10.7202/1101314ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research objective: This article examines the sustainability of communities of practice (CoP), which are typically considered through deterministic approaches, using the theoretical framework of the commons. By analogy, this article proposes to analyze CoPs as organizations and organizing. This approach should identify the internal conditions for the reproduction of a CoP. The objective of this research is thus to understand the conditions of self-organization and sustainability of a CoP. Methodology: To do so, we use a mixed methodology. After a qualitative study of several months observing and analyzing two CoPs, we rely on a quantitative study of seven CoPs within a company, MUTUALIS. A questionnaire analyzing the organization and organizing of CoPs was sent to members. 76 responses were retained and analyzed with SMART PLS. Contribution: While this article identifies the potential for internal reproduction of CoPs and therefore sustainability, it also emphasizes that this remains partial through instrumental use. The more instrumental it is, the more CoPs minimize their organizational reproduction and self-organization. To overcome this limit, the framework of the commons ultimately proposes an integrative approach to the organization of a self-organized collective action that leads us to think about democratization at a multi-level scale. Finally, this study demonstrates the imperative of a more general organizational transformation of the company that cannot be reduced to sporadic devices or communities.","PeriodicalId":45927,"journal":{"name":"Relations Industrielles-Industrial Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Relations Industrielles-Industrial Relations","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1101314ar","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research objective: This article examines the sustainability of communities of practice (CoP), which are typically considered through deterministic approaches, using the theoretical framework of the commons. By analogy, this article proposes to analyze CoPs as organizations and organizing. This approach should identify the internal conditions for the reproduction of a CoP. The objective of this research is thus to understand the conditions of self-organization and sustainability of a CoP. Methodology: To do so, we use a mixed methodology. After a qualitative study of several months observing and analyzing two CoPs, we rely on a quantitative study of seven CoPs within a company, MUTUALIS. A questionnaire analyzing the organization and organizing of CoPs was sent to members. 76 responses were retained and analyzed with SMART PLS. Contribution: While this article identifies the potential for internal reproduction of CoPs and therefore sustainability, it also emphasizes that this remains partial through instrumental use. The more instrumental it is, the more CoPs minimize their organizational reproduction and self-organization. To overcome this limit, the framework of the commons ultimately proposes an integrative approach to the organization of a self-organized collective action that leads us to think about democratization at a multi-level scale. Finally, this study demonstrates the imperative of a more general organizational transformation of the company that cannot be reduced to sporadic devices or communities.
阐明实践社区可持续性的共同组织条件
研究目标:本文使用公地的理论框架,通过确定性方法研究实践社区(CoP)的可持续性。通过类比,本文提出将cop作为组织和组织来分析。这种方法应该确定复制CoP的内部条件。因此,本研究的目的是了解缔约方会议的自组织和可持续性条件。方法:为此,我们使用混合方法。经过几个月的定性研究,观察和分析了两个cop,我们依赖于对MUTUALIS公司内七个cop的定量研究。向成员发送了一份分析cop组织和组织情况的问卷。本文保留了76个响应,并使用SMART PLS进行了分析。贡献:虽然本文确定了cop内部复制的潜力,从而确定了可持续性,但它也强调了这仍然是部分通过工具使用。它的工具性越强,cop就越能将其组织再生产和自组织最小化。为了克服这一限制,公地框架最终提出了一种组织自组织集体行动的综合方法,这种方法引导我们在多层次尺度上思考民主化。最后,本研究证明了公司更普遍的组织转型的必要性,不能减少到零星的设备或社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Relations Industrielles-Industrial Relations
Relations Industrielles-Industrial Relations INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信