The effect Blended training on comparison with in-person training on self-care behaviors in type 2 diabetes patients

Q4 Social Sciences
Mehrnoosh Khoshnoodi far, Zohreh Arabnezhad, Hadi Tehrani, Somayeh Akbari farmad
{"title":"The effect Blended training on comparison with in-person training on self-care behaviors in type 2 diabetes patients","authors":"Mehrnoosh Khoshnoodi far, Zohreh Arabnezhad, Hadi Tehrani, Somayeh Akbari farmad","doi":"10.29252/ijhehp.7.4.333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objective: Diabetes is one of the most common diseases caused by metabolic disorders. This disease is not definitive, but it can be controlled. Successful diabetes control depends largely on patient self-care because more than 95 percent of diabetes care is done by the patient himself. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect Blended training on comparison with inperson training on self-care behaviors in type 2 diabetes patients. Materials and Methods: This study was a quasi-experimental study with two groups of blended training and in-person training in which 60 patients with type 2 diabetes were randomly divided into blended training and in-person groups. Data were collected by standard questionnaires of SDSCA (Diabetes Self-Care Behavior Inventory). For the blended training group, blended training programs were implemented and the in-person training group received the training in person at the health center. The results were analyzed by SPSS 16 software. Results: Before the intervention, the mean and standard deviation of self-care score in the in-person training group was 3.3 ± 0.74 and three months after the intervention was 3.87 ± 0.99, In the blended training group before the intervention, the mean and standard deviation of self-care was 3.56 ± 0.64 and three months after the intervention was 4.6 ± 0.85, this difference was statistically significant in both groups. But this increase was in favor of blended training. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that the use of blended training method is more effective in increasing the self-care of patients with type 2 diabetes than the in-person training. Therefore, the use of this method in controlling and reducing the complications of the disease is recommended in patients with type 2 diabetes.","PeriodicalId":36058,"journal":{"name":"Health Education and Health Promotion","volume":"8 1","pages":"333-342"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29252/ijhehp.7.4.333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background and Objective: Diabetes is one of the most common diseases caused by metabolic disorders. This disease is not definitive, but it can be controlled. Successful diabetes control depends largely on patient self-care because more than 95 percent of diabetes care is done by the patient himself. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect Blended training on comparison with inperson training on self-care behaviors in type 2 diabetes patients. Materials and Methods: This study was a quasi-experimental study with two groups of blended training and in-person training in which 60 patients with type 2 diabetes were randomly divided into blended training and in-person groups. Data were collected by standard questionnaires of SDSCA (Diabetes Self-Care Behavior Inventory). For the blended training group, blended training programs were implemented and the in-person training group received the training in person at the health center. The results were analyzed by SPSS 16 software. Results: Before the intervention, the mean and standard deviation of self-care score in the in-person training group was 3.3 ± 0.74 and three months after the intervention was 3.87 ± 0.99, In the blended training group before the intervention, the mean and standard deviation of self-care was 3.56 ± 0.64 and three months after the intervention was 4.6 ± 0.85, this difference was statistically significant in both groups. But this increase was in favor of blended training. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that the use of blended training method is more effective in increasing the self-care of patients with type 2 diabetes than the in-person training. Therefore, the use of this method in controlling and reducing the complications of the disease is recommended in patients with type 2 diabetes.
混合式训练与面对面训练对2型糖尿病患者自我护理行为的影响比较
背景与目的:糖尿病是代谢性疾病引起的最常见疾病之一。这种疾病不是决定性的,但它是可以控制的。成功的糖尿病控制在很大程度上取决于患者的自我护理,因为95%以上的糖尿病护理是由患者自己完成的。本研究的目的是比较混合训练与面对面训练对2型糖尿病患者自我护理行为的影响。材料与方法:本研究为准实验研究,将60例2型糖尿病患者随机分为混合训练组和现场训练组。采用SDSCA(糖尿病自我护理行为量表)标准问卷收集数据。对于混合训练组,实施混合训练计划,而现场训练组在健康中心接受亲自培训。采用SPSS 16软件对结果进行分析。结果:干预前,现场训练组自我护理得分均值和标准差为3.3±0.74,干预后3个月均值和标准差为3.87±0.99;干预前混合训练组自我护理得分均值和标准差为3.56±0.64,干预后3个月均值和标准差为4.6±0.85,两组差异均有统计学意义。但这一增长有利于混合型培训。结论:本研究结果表明,采用混合训练方法比现场训练更能有效地提高2型糖尿病患者的自我护理能力。因此,推荐在2型糖尿病患者中使用这种方法来控制和减少疾病的并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Education and Health Promotion
Health Education and Health Promotion Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信