The comparison of the effect of double and flat pyramid training methods on hypertrophy and muscular strength of male power-lifters

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
M. Rasekh, R. Shabani
{"title":"The comparison of the effect of double and flat pyramid training methods on hypertrophy and muscular strength of male power-lifters","authors":"M. Rasekh, R. Shabani","doi":"10.15561/20755279.2021.0203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Authors’ Contribution: A –Study design; B –Data collection; C –Statistical analysis; D –Manuscript Preparation; E – Funds Collection Abstract Background and Study Aim Resistance training is considered as the most effective method to increase muscle strength and mass. The present study aimed to compare the effect of a double pyramid and a flat pyramid training methods on hypertrophy and muscular strength of male power-lifters. Material and Methods Thirty students (age 21.40±1.71 years) were randomly assigned to three groups of double pyramid training (10 subjects), flat pyramid training (10 subjects), and the control trained by the traditional method (10 subjects). The experimental groups were trained three sessions a week for eight weeks whereas the control group continued their ordinary training program in the traditional method two sessions a week. Before and after the training, the muscular strength index was measured by bench press, leg press, and deadlift and the muscle volume was determined in their chest, arm, and thigh. Data were statistically examined by the analysis of variance and paired t test in the SPSS (ver. 21) software package. The significance level was set at the P<0.05 level. Results Significant differences were observed among the studied groups in the variables of bench press, leg press, and deadlift, as well as in the variables of arm volume, chest volume, and thigh volume (P < 0.05). Bench press, leg press, deadlift, and the volume of arm, chest, and thigh were increased significantly from the pretest to the posttest in all three groups (P < 0.001). Conclusions: A double and flat pyramid training period has similar positive impacts on muscular strength and volume of power-lifters.","PeriodicalId":51897,"journal":{"name":"Physical Education of Students","volume":"16 1","pages":"92-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Education of Students","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2021.0203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Authors’ Contribution: A –Study design; B –Data collection; C –Statistical analysis; D –Manuscript Preparation; E – Funds Collection Abstract Background and Study Aim Resistance training is considered as the most effective method to increase muscle strength and mass. The present study aimed to compare the effect of a double pyramid and a flat pyramid training methods on hypertrophy and muscular strength of male power-lifters. Material and Methods Thirty students (age 21.40±1.71 years) were randomly assigned to three groups of double pyramid training (10 subjects), flat pyramid training (10 subjects), and the control trained by the traditional method (10 subjects). The experimental groups were trained three sessions a week for eight weeks whereas the control group continued their ordinary training program in the traditional method two sessions a week. Before and after the training, the muscular strength index was measured by bench press, leg press, and deadlift and the muscle volume was determined in their chest, arm, and thigh. Data were statistically examined by the analysis of variance and paired t test in the SPSS (ver. 21) software package. The significance level was set at the P<0.05 level. Results Significant differences were observed among the studied groups in the variables of bench press, leg press, and deadlift, as well as in the variables of arm volume, chest volume, and thigh volume (P < 0.05). Bench press, leg press, deadlift, and the volume of arm, chest, and thigh were increased significantly from the pretest to the posttest in all three groups (P < 0.001). Conclusions: A double and flat pyramid training period has similar positive impacts on muscular strength and volume of power-lifters.
双金字塔与平金字塔训练方式对男子力量举重运动员肥厚及肌力的影响比较
作者贡献:A -研究设计;B -数据收集;C -统计分析;D -稿件准备;摘要背景与研究目的抗阻训练被认为是增加肌肉力量和质量的最有效方法。本研究旨在比较双金字塔与平金字塔训练方式对男性力量举重运动员肥厚和肌肉力量的影响。材料与方法30名学生(年龄21.40±1.71岁)随机分为双金字塔训练组(10例)、平金字塔训练组(10例)和传统训练对照组(10例)。实验组每周训练三次,持续八周,而对照组继续他们的常规训练计划,每周训练两次。训练前后分别通过卧推、腿推、硬举测量肌肉力量指数,测定胸部、手臂、大腿肌肉体积。数据采用SPSS (ver.)的方差分析和配对t检验进行统计学检验。软件包。显著性水平为P<0.05。结果两组在卧推、腿推、硬举三项指标及臂量、胸量、大腿量指标上差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。从测试前到测试后,三组的卧推、腿推、硬举以及手臂、胸部和大腿的体积都显著增加(P < 0.001)。结论:双金字塔和平金字塔训练对力量举重运动员的肌肉力量和体积有相似的积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physical Education of Students
Physical Education of Students EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信