Vernadsky's concept of the noosphere and its reflection in ethical and moral values of society

IF 0.2 Q4 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
G. Jasečková, Milan Konvit, Lukáš Vartiak
{"title":"Vernadsky's concept of the noosphere and its reflection in ethical and moral values of society","authors":"G. Jasečková, Milan Konvit, Lukáš Vartiak","doi":"10.32703/2415-7422-2022-12-2-231-248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper assesses the topicality of Vernadsky's concept of the noosphere, coined over almost twenty years starting in the early 20th century. Emphasizing the uniqueness of Vernadsky's concept of the noosphere as the transformation of the biosphere by a man using reason, we concentrate on the assessment of the utopian or realistic nature of his vision of the future of humanity. Based on the philosophical case-studies analysis, it identifies the ideological roots of the noosphere concept, the development of views on the concept in time, the role of reason and scientific thinking, the opinions of its supporters and critics, and Moiseev's related concept of co-evolution. We point out the correlation between Vernadsky's concept of the noosphere and Moiseev's bifurcation and his two imperatives as necessary conditions for the co-evolution of nature and man. We document that Vernadský did not only think about the positive role of reason in the creation and development of the noosphere, but he was also aware of the possibility of its misuse. We compare Vernadsky's idea of the collective reason creation with Kurzweil's concept of technological singularity, Crutzen's concept of the Anthropocene, Haff's concept of the technosphere and Cer's scenario of the possible future development towards the creation of tech subjects and the replacement of the biosphere with the technosphere. We also assess the possibility of approximating essential concept-forming elements, i.e. philosophical categories, collective reason, the collective intelligence of humanity, and scientific knowledge facilitated by information and communication technology. Ultimately, conclusions concerning the topicality of Vernadsky's concept of noosphere are formulated. We argue that Vernadský's concept of the noosphere is timeless and should be taken not as a utopia but, on the contrary, as a scenario of possible development along the line of geosphere – biosphere – noosphere, prospectively with its transfer to the cosmic dimension.","PeriodicalId":36356,"journal":{"name":"History of Science and Technology","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32703/2415-7422-2022-12-2-231-248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The paper assesses the topicality of Vernadsky's concept of the noosphere, coined over almost twenty years starting in the early 20th century. Emphasizing the uniqueness of Vernadsky's concept of the noosphere as the transformation of the biosphere by a man using reason, we concentrate on the assessment of the utopian or realistic nature of his vision of the future of humanity. Based on the philosophical case-studies analysis, it identifies the ideological roots of the noosphere concept, the development of views on the concept in time, the role of reason and scientific thinking, the opinions of its supporters and critics, and Moiseev's related concept of co-evolution. We point out the correlation between Vernadsky's concept of the noosphere and Moiseev's bifurcation and his two imperatives as necessary conditions for the co-evolution of nature and man. We document that Vernadský did not only think about the positive role of reason in the creation and development of the noosphere, but he was also aware of the possibility of its misuse. We compare Vernadsky's idea of the collective reason creation with Kurzweil's concept of technological singularity, Crutzen's concept of the Anthropocene, Haff's concept of the technosphere and Cer's scenario of the possible future development towards the creation of tech subjects and the replacement of the biosphere with the technosphere. We also assess the possibility of approximating essential concept-forming elements, i.e. philosophical categories, collective reason, the collective intelligence of humanity, and scientific knowledge facilitated by information and communication technology. Ultimately, conclusions concerning the topicality of Vernadsky's concept of noosphere are formulated. We argue that Vernadský's concept of the noosphere is timeless and should be taken not as a utopia but, on the contrary, as a scenario of possible development along the line of geosphere – biosphere – noosphere, prospectively with its transfer to the cosmic dimension.
沃尔纳德斯基的精神圈概念及其在社会伦理道德价值中的反映
本文评估了沃尔纳德斯基的人际圈概念的话题性,这一概念从20世纪初开始创造了近20年。强调沃尔纳德斯基的人类圈概念的独特性,即人类利用理性对生物圈的改造,我们集中精力评估他对人类未来愿景的乌托邦或现实主义性质。在哲学案例分析的基础上,对人类圈概念的思想根源、对这一概念的看法在时间上的发展、理性和科学思维的作用、其支持者和批评者的观点以及莫伊谢耶夫的相关共同进化概念进行了识别。我们指出沃尔纳德斯基的人类圈概念与莫伊谢耶夫的分岔之间的联系,以及他的两个命令作为自然与人类共同进化的必要条件。我们的文件表明,Vernadský不仅考虑到理性在精神世界的创造和发展中的积极作用,而且他也意识到它被滥用的可能性。我们将沃尔纳德斯基的集体理性创造思想与库兹韦尔的技术奇点概念、克鲁岑的人类世概念、哈夫的技术圈概念以及Cer对未来可能发展的技术主体创造和技术圈取代生物圈的设想进行比较。我们还评估了接近基本概念形成要素的可能性,即哲学范畴、集体理性、人类的集体智慧以及信息和通信技术促进的科学知识。最后,对沃尔纳德斯基的人际圈概念的话题性进行了总结。我们认为Vernadský的人类圈概念是永恒的,不应被视为乌托邦,而应被视为沿着地圈-生物圈-人类圈这条线可能发展的情景,并有可能转移到宇宙维度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
History of Science and Technology
History of Science and Technology Arts and Humanities-Museology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
33.30%
发文量
11
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信