Does the content of financial literacy education resources vary based on who made or paid for them?

Q2 Social Sciences
G. Henderson, Pamela Beach, Lucy Sun, J. McConnel
{"title":"Does the content of financial literacy education resources vary based on who made or paid for them?","authors":"G. Henderson, Pamela Beach, Lucy Sun, J. McConnel","doi":"10.1177/2047173420961031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the decade since the global financial crisis, an increasing number of jurisdictions have added mandatory financial literacy education to school curricula. Governments recognize that this increases the burden on teachers, who may also lack the confidence to teach financial literacy. One response is to encourage the use of resources produced or sponsored by the financial services industry. The concern is that these resources may promote the industry’s interest in maximizing profits and minimizing regulation over students’ interest in becoming empowered financial consumers. As a first step in investigating this concern, we compared resources from the Canadian Financial Literacy Database produced or sponsored by the financial services industry with those produced by government, non-profit organizations and individuals. We focused on online resources intended for use by elementary teachers and students to determine whether the key themes and messages conveyed vary based on who made or paid for the resource. We found that key themes are consistent across resources, regardless of industry affiliation, but that resources produced or sponsored by the financial services industry are more likely to exhibit a moralistic tone.","PeriodicalId":52531,"journal":{"name":"Citizenship, Social and Economics Education","volume":"12 1","pages":"192 - 210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Citizenship, Social and Economics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2047173420961031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In the decade since the global financial crisis, an increasing number of jurisdictions have added mandatory financial literacy education to school curricula. Governments recognize that this increases the burden on teachers, who may also lack the confidence to teach financial literacy. One response is to encourage the use of resources produced or sponsored by the financial services industry. The concern is that these resources may promote the industry’s interest in maximizing profits and minimizing regulation over students’ interest in becoming empowered financial consumers. As a first step in investigating this concern, we compared resources from the Canadian Financial Literacy Database produced or sponsored by the financial services industry with those produced by government, non-profit organizations and individuals. We focused on online resources intended for use by elementary teachers and students to determine whether the key themes and messages conveyed vary based on who made or paid for the resource. We found that key themes are consistent across resources, regardless of industry affiliation, but that resources produced or sponsored by the financial services industry are more likely to exhibit a moralistic tone.
金融素养教育资源的内容是否因其制作者或付费者而异?
在全球金融危机爆发后的十年里,越来越多的司法管辖区在学校课程中增加了强制性的金融知识教育。各国政府认识到,这增加了教师的负担,他们也可能缺乏传授金融知识的信心。一种应对措施是鼓励使用金融服务业生产或赞助的资源。令人担忧的是,这些资源可能会促进行业对利润最大化和监管最小化的兴趣,而不是学生成为授权金融消费者的兴趣。作为调查这一问题的第一步,我们比较了由金融服务行业制作或赞助的加拿大金融素养数据库的资源,以及由政府、非营利组织和个人制作的资源。我们将重点放在供小学教师和学生使用的在线资源上,以确定所传达的关键主题和信息是否因资源的制作者或付费者而异。我们发现,关键主题在不同的资源之间是一致的,而与行业无关,但金融服务行业生产或赞助的资源更有可能表现出一种道德基调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Citizenship, Social and Economics Education
Citizenship, Social and Economics Education Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: Citizenship, Social and Economics Education (CSEE) is the official journal of the International Association for Citizenship, Social and Economics Education. CSEE is an online-only, peer-reviewed journal that provides a focus for scholarly and professional studies in the fields of education, socialisation, curriculum development and aspects of economics, sociology, politics and social psychology. The journal aims to bring together this range of disciplines into an enabling forum of discussion and exchange. It includes analyses of how children learn about societies, current and past, reports and accounts of current research from a variety of disciplines, as well as reporting and analysing contemporary professional practices and innovations, in curriculum and in the organisation of educational change in these areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书