Próteses penianas no tratamento da disfunção erétil: a casuística de 13 anos

Luis Sepúlveda , Ana Meireles , Pedro Moreira , Henrique Dinis , Vera Marques , Francisco Rolo , Alfredo Mota
{"title":"Próteses penianas no tratamento da disfunção erétil: a casuística de 13 anos","authors":"Luis Sepúlveda ,&nbsp;Ana Meireles ,&nbsp;Pedro Moreira ,&nbsp;Henrique Dinis ,&nbsp;Vera Marques ,&nbsp;Francisco Rolo ,&nbsp;Alfredo Mota","doi":"10.1016/j.acup.2016.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and Objectives</h3><p>Penile prosthesis implantation is a common, well‐established treatment for correcting medical refractory erectile dysfunction. Although more invasive than some of the other currently available therapies, PP surgery has the advantages of high patient satisfaction rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical results and patient satisfaction after implantation of PP in 25 patients treated at the University Hospital of Coimbra (CHUC).</p></div><div><h3>Material and Methods</h3><p>We evaluated 25 patients with erectile dysfunction who underwent implantation of PP, inflatable and semi‐rigid, between November 2000 and November 2013. The information was obtained from medical records and telephone interviews and encompassed clinical severity, comorbidity, etiology, PP type, surgical complications, need for reintervention and degree of patient satisfaction.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>88% of patients had severe ED. The main etiologies reported were: multifactorial (46.4%), atherogenic (24%) and neurologic (16%). Most devices implanted were inflatable prostheses (84%). In 80% of the cases there were no complications reported; the rate of re‐intervention was 20%. There were a high percentage of satisfied / very satisfied patients (65%).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion/Conclusion</h3><p>PP surgery remains an excellent alternative in restoring erectile function in patients whose medical therapies have failed. Despite its invasive nature, the implementation of PP has proven to be associated with a low rate of complications and a high degree of patient satisfaction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100020,"journal":{"name":"Acta Urológica Portuguesa","volume":"33 3","pages":"Pages 75-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.acup.2016.10.003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Urológica Portuguesa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2341402216300325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and Objectives

Penile prosthesis implantation is a common, well‐established treatment for correcting medical refractory erectile dysfunction. Although more invasive than some of the other currently available therapies, PP surgery has the advantages of high patient satisfaction rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical results and patient satisfaction after implantation of PP in 25 patients treated at the University Hospital of Coimbra (CHUC).

Material and Methods

We evaluated 25 patients with erectile dysfunction who underwent implantation of PP, inflatable and semi‐rigid, between November 2000 and November 2013. The information was obtained from medical records and telephone interviews and encompassed clinical severity, comorbidity, etiology, PP type, surgical complications, need for reintervention and degree of patient satisfaction.

Results

88% of patients had severe ED. The main etiologies reported were: multifactorial (46.4%), atherogenic (24%) and neurologic (16%). Most devices implanted were inflatable prostheses (84%). In 80% of the cases there were no complications reported; the rate of re‐intervention was 20%. There were a high percentage of satisfied / very satisfied patients (65%).

Discussion/Conclusion

PP surgery remains an excellent alternative in restoring erectile function in patients whose medical therapies have failed. Despite its invasive nature, the implementation of PP has proven to be associated with a low rate of complications and a high degree of patient satisfaction.

阴茎假体治疗勃起功能障碍:13年的案例研究
前言与目的阴茎假体植入术是一种常见的、成熟的治疗顽固性勃起功能障碍的方法。虽然比其他一些目前可用的治疗更具侵入性,但PP手术具有患者满意率高的优点。本研究的目的是评估25例在科英布拉大学医院(CHUC)接受治疗的PP植入后的手术效果和患者满意度。材料与方法我们评估了2000年11月至2013年11月期间25例接受PP、充气和半刚性植入的勃起功能障碍患者。这些信息是从医疗记录和电话访谈中获得的,包括临床严重程度、合并症、病因、PP类型、手术并发症、再干预需求和患者满意度。结果88%的患者有严重ED,主要病因为:多因素(46.4%)、动脉粥样硬化(24%)和神经系统(16%)。大多数植入装置为充气假体(84%)。80%的病例无并发症报告;再干预率为20%。满意/非常满意的患者比例很高(65%)。讨论/结论对于药物治疗失败的患者,pp手术仍然是恢复勃起功能的一个很好的选择。尽管具有侵入性,但PP的实施已被证明与低并发症率和高患者满意度相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信