COVID-19 challenges in organising teaching at a faculty of pharmacy

IF 1.1 Q2 Social Sciences
O. Rahić, M. Sirbubalo, A. Tucak, J. Hadžiabdić, A. Elezovic, E. Vranić
{"title":"COVID-19 challenges in organising teaching at a faculty of pharmacy","authors":"O. Rahić, M. Sirbubalo, A. Tucak, J. Hadžiabdić, A. Elezovic, E. Vranić","doi":"10.1136/bmjstel-2021-000896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial reuse. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. We come from Bosnia and Herzegovina, a small country in western Balkans. Our Faculty of Pharmacy at the University of Sarajevo was opened in 1973, but from then on there was no kind of online teaching. So when the COVID-19 pandemic broke out, and when the university decided to stop all kinds of ‘inclass’ teaching (12 March 2020), we were faced with something new. We work at the Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, where we teach regular courses on ‘Drug Formulation’ and ‘Industrial Pharmacy’. Students take classes in these subjects in the seventh, eighth and ninth semesters. The exercises are practical and last several hours. On 25 March 2020, classes in the lecture hall were suspended until further notice by the decision of the Senate of the University of Sarajevo, and then we realised that we must embark on the adventure of organising online classes. We carried out short research on available online teaching platforms to find basic information on the platform’s capabilities, identify their advantages and disadvantages, and check their commercial prices. We studied the following platforms for online courses: Google Meet, Adobe Connect, Zoom and BigBlueButton, and the following platforms for online examinations: Exam. net, Virtualx, Google Forms, Skillsbook, Papershala, Edbase, Kaldin and TCExam. After examining the possibilities of the available online teaching platforms, we agreed that Zoom and Google Meet provide the best results for running online courses. Adobe Connect, Blackboard Collaborate and BigBlueButton work on the same principle, but professional versions of these platforms were quite unaffordable to us. The results for the online examination platforms are summarised in table 1. Given the security and price of the platforms, we concluded that Exam. net currently meets our criteria, but that it would be necessary to use two platforms simultaneously during the examination, one of which would allow an established video connection with students during the examination (eg, a combination of Exam. net and Zoom). Students accessed the examination platform from their laptop while simultaneously established a video connection with the teacher on their mobile device. At the end of the semester, we conducted an online survey in which 60 (70.93%) of 86 students participated, and for 98.4% of the students this was their first online learning experience. Although it is assumed that current students (digital natives) have adequate information and communications technology competence, they differ in their computer and information literacy as they come from different socioeconomic backgrounds. Of the students, 21.3% had technical difficulties (ie, unstable connection). One of them said she/he has problems with misunderstanding from parents who required help with housework at the time of the lecture because she/he comes from the countryside. Of the students, 75% were satisfied with the conducted online classes at our department. Onethird found it easier to follow theoretical lectures online. Here are some comments from the students:","PeriodicalId":44757,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","volume":"2 1","pages":"646 - 647"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2021-000896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial reuse. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. We come from Bosnia and Herzegovina, a small country in western Balkans. Our Faculty of Pharmacy at the University of Sarajevo was opened in 1973, but from then on there was no kind of online teaching. So when the COVID-19 pandemic broke out, and when the university decided to stop all kinds of ‘inclass’ teaching (12 March 2020), we were faced with something new. We work at the Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, where we teach regular courses on ‘Drug Formulation’ and ‘Industrial Pharmacy’. Students take classes in these subjects in the seventh, eighth and ninth semesters. The exercises are practical and last several hours. On 25 March 2020, classes in the lecture hall were suspended until further notice by the decision of the Senate of the University of Sarajevo, and then we realised that we must embark on the adventure of organising online classes. We carried out short research on available online teaching platforms to find basic information on the platform’s capabilities, identify their advantages and disadvantages, and check their commercial prices. We studied the following platforms for online courses: Google Meet, Adobe Connect, Zoom and BigBlueButton, and the following platforms for online examinations: Exam. net, Virtualx, Google Forms, Skillsbook, Papershala, Edbase, Kaldin and TCExam. After examining the possibilities of the available online teaching platforms, we agreed that Zoom and Google Meet provide the best results for running online courses. Adobe Connect, Blackboard Collaborate and BigBlueButton work on the same principle, but professional versions of these platforms were quite unaffordable to us. The results for the online examination platforms are summarised in table 1. Given the security and price of the platforms, we concluded that Exam. net currently meets our criteria, but that it would be necessary to use two platforms simultaneously during the examination, one of which would allow an established video connection with students during the examination (eg, a combination of Exam. net and Zoom). Students accessed the examination platform from their laptop while simultaneously established a video connection with the teacher on their mobile device. At the end of the semester, we conducted an online survey in which 60 (70.93%) of 86 students participated, and for 98.4% of the students this was their first online learning experience. Although it is assumed that current students (digital natives) have adequate information and communications technology competence, they differ in their computer and information literacy as they come from different socioeconomic backgrounds. Of the students, 21.3% had technical difficulties (ie, unstable connection). One of them said she/he has problems with misunderstanding from parents who required help with housework at the time of the lecture because she/he comes from the countryside. Of the students, 75% were satisfied with the conducted online classes at our department. Onethird found it easier to follow theoretical lectures online. Here are some comments from the students:
2019冠状病毒病在药学院组织教学中的挑战
©作者(或其雇主)2021。禁止商业重用。请参阅权利和权限。英国医学杂志出版。我们来自波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那,一个西巴尔干半岛的小国。萨拉热窝大学的药学院成立于1973年,但从那时起就没有在线教学。因此,当COVID-19大流行爆发时,当大学决定停止各种“课堂”教学(2020年3月12日)时,我们面临着一些新的问题。我们在制药技术系工作,在那里我们教授“药物配方”和“工业制药”的常规课程。学生们在第七、第八和第九学期上这些课程。练习是实用的,持续几个小时。2020年3月25日,在萨拉热窝大学参议院的决定进一步通知之前,演讲厅的课程暂停,然后我们意识到我们必须开始组织在线课程的冒险。我们对现有的在线教学平台进行了简短的调查,了解平台能力的基本信息,确定其优势和劣势,并查看其商业价格。我们学习了以下的在线课程平台:Google Meet, Adobe Connect, Zoom和BigBlueButton;学习了以下的在线考试平台:net、Virtualx、Google Forms、Skillsbook、Papershala、Edbase、Kaldin和TCExam。在考察了现有在线教学平台的可能性之后,我们一致认为Zoom和Google Meet提供了运行在线课程的最佳结果。Adobe Connect、Blackboard collaboration和BigBlueButton的工作原理是一样的,但是这些平台的专业版本对我们来说是负担不起的。在线考试平台的结果总结于表1。考虑到平台的安全性和价格,我们得出结论:net目前符合我们的标准,但有必要在考试期间同时使用两个平台,其中一个平台将允许在考试期间与学生建立视频连接(例如,结合考试。net和Zoom)。学生们通过笔记本电脑访问考试平台,同时通过移动设备与老师建立视频连接。在学期结束时,我们进行了一次在线调查,86名学生中有60人(70.93%)参与了调查,其中98.4%的学生是第一次在线学习。虽然假设当前的学生(数字原住民)具有足够的信息和通信技术能力,但由于他们来自不同的社会经济背景,他们在计算机和信息素养方面存在差异。21.3%的学生有技术上的困难(即连接不稳定)。其中一名学生说,由于来自农村,她/他经常被家长误解,因为他们在上课时要求帮忙做家务。75%的学生对我们系的在线课程表示满意。三分之一的人认为在线学习理论课程更容易。以下是学生们的一些评论:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信