Sex Differences in Two- and Three-Dimensional Visual-Spatial Abilities: Complementary Models of What and Where Judgments

K. Phillips, G. Cupchik
{"title":"Sex Differences in Two- and Three-Dimensional Visual-Spatial Abilities: Complementary Models of What and Where Judgments","authors":"K. Phillips, G. Cupchik","doi":"10.1556/JCEP.1.2003.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An examination of sex differences in spatial abilities reveals comparative superiority of males and females on mental rotation and location memory tasks, respectively. The existing cross-cultural data focus primarily on male-biased spatial tests and suggests that the sex difference in mental rotation ability is near universal. While cultural pressures can enhance or diminish performance, its magnitude is preserved. Proximate causes, including the organizational and activational effects of hormones, may move these performance distributions closer or further apart. Evolutionary-based theories have focussed mainly on sexual selection versus division of labour as the critical factors in the selection of male-female spatial specializations. A unified model of human spatial judgment is proposed considering fundamental differences between three-dimensional judgments of spatial rotation and two-dimensional judgments associated with spatial location memory. Mental rotation ability is favored when a stationary view...","PeriodicalId":89409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cultural and evolutionary psychology","volume":"31 1","pages":"53-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cultural and evolutionary psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/JCEP.1.2003.1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

An examination of sex differences in spatial abilities reveals comparative superiority of males and females on mental rotation and location memory tasks, respectively. The existing cross-cultural data focus primarily on male-biased spatial tests and suggests that the sex difference in mental rotation ability is near universal. While cultural pressures can enhance or diminish performance, its magnitude is preserved. Proximate causes, including the organizational and activational effects of hormones, may move these performance distributions closer or further apart. Evolutionary-based theories have focussed mainly on sexual selection versus division of labour as the critical factors in the selection of male-female spatial specializations. A unified model of human spatial judgment is proposed considering fundamental differences between three-dimensional judgments of spatial rotation and two-dimensional judgments associated with spatial location memory. Mental rotation ability is favored when a stationary view...
二维和三维视觉空间能力的性别差异:判断是什么和在哪里的互补模型
一项关于空间能力性别差异的研究显示,男性和女性分别在心理旋转和位置记忆任务上具有相对优势。现有的跨文化数据主要集中在男性偏向的空间测试上,表明心理旋转能力的性别差异几乎是普遍存在的。虽然文化压力可以提高或降低绩效,但其规模是保持不变的。直接原因,包括激素的组织和激活效应,可能使这些表现分布更接近或更远。基于进化的理论主要集中在性别选择和劳动分工作为男女空间专业化选择的关键因素。考虑到空间旋转的三维判断与空间位置记忆的二维判断的根本区别,提出了一种统一的人类空间判断模型。当一个固定的视角时,心理旋转能力更受青睐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书