{"title":"Clinical and Radiological Features Associated with Bladder Invasion and Need for Urological Intervention in Suspected Placenta Accreta","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/jgrm.03.06.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: We investigated clinical and radiological predictors of bladder invasion and need for urological\nintervention in pregnant women with suspected placenta accreta.\nMethods: We conducted a retrospective study including pregnant women with ultrasonographic (US) suspicion\nof placenta accreta. Surgical and clinical data were reviewed, and seven US parameters were used to classify the\npatients. A single and expert radiologist reviewed Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and used nine parameters\nfor classification. Chi-square, Fisher´s exact test or Mann-Whitney and logistic regression were used to calculate\nthe risk of bladder invasion and need of cystorrhaphy for continuous variables.\nResults: Twenty-seven patients fulfilled all the inclusion criteria, and the histological diagnosis of placenta accreta,\nincreta or percreta was performed in 5, 8 and 14 patients respectively. Regarding clinical data, the risk of placenta\npercreta increases 35.7% for each maternal year and three times for each cesarean section. Bilateral prophylactic\ndouble J catheter was attempted in all patients, but successful in 81,48%, mostly in percreta patients. There were\nsigns of bladder invasion in 9 patients, all with placenta percreta. The risk of bladder injury suture increases by\n26.41% for each maternal year, in the same way, increase 5.7 times for each cesarean section.\nConclusion: Maternal age and number of cesareans are the only direct predictors of the depth of placental invasion\nand risk of urological intervention. None US or MRI parameters had a predictive role in the depth of invasion or\nto the risk of cystorrhaphy.","PeriodicalId":93778,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology, clinical obstetrics and reproductive medicine","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology, clinical obstetrics and reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/jgrm.03.06.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: We investigated clinical and radiological predictors of bladder invasion and need for urological
intervention in pregnant women with suspected placenta accreta.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective study including pregnant women with ultrasonographic (US) suspicion
of placenta accreta. Surgical and clinical data were reviewed, and seven US parameters were used to classify the
patients. A single and expert radiologist reviewed Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and used nine parameters
for classification. Chi-square, Fisher´s exact test or Mann-Whitney and logistic regression were used to calculate
the risk of bladder invasion and need of cystorrhaphy for continuous variables.
Results: Twenty-seven patients fulfilled all the inclusion criteria, and the histological diagnosis of placenta accreta,
increta or percreta was performed in 5, 8 and 14 patients respectively. Regarding clinical data, the risk of placenta
percreta increases 35.7% for each maternal year and three times for each cesarean section. Bilateral prophylactic
double J catheter was attempted in all patients, but successful in 81,48%, mostly in percreta patients. There were
signs of bladder invasion in 9 patients, all with placenta percreta. The risk of bladder injury suture increases by
26.41% for each maternal year, in the same way, increase 5.7 times for each cesarean section.
Conclusion: Maternal age and number of cesareans are the only direct predictors of the depth of placental invasion
and risk of urological intervention. None US or MRI parameters had a predictive role in the depth of invasion or
to the risk of cystorrhaphy.