Transvenous lead extraction: the Tandem approach

Z. Akhtar, Z. Zuberi, Lwm Leung, C. Kontogiannis, K. Waleed, AI Elbatran, M. Sohal, M. Gallagher
{"title":"Transvenous lead extraction: the Tandem approach","authors":"Z. Akhtar, Z. Zuberi, Lwm Leung, C. Kontogiannis, K. Waleed, AI Elbatran, M. Sohal, M. Gallagher","doi":"10.1093/europace/euac053.535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Type of funding sources: None.\n \n \n \n Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) has become an important strategy in the management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). A rising population of patients with CIEDs coupled with an expanding indication for TLE, has fuelled demand. There are notable procedural risks however development of techniques and tools have contributed to an improvement in the safety and efficacy of TLE. The mechanical rotational dissecting sheath is safe and efficacious whilst the Needle’s Eye Snare (NES) is an additional ‘bail-out’ strategy contributing to procedural success.\n \n \n \n We sought to evaluate the outcomes of TLE performed from the superior access in conjunction with counter-traction provided by snaring of the targeted lead via the femoral access.\n \n \n \n The ‘Tandem’ procedure consisted of the rotational powered sheath performing dissection of the adhesions encapsulating the leads (at the superior access), in ‘Tandem’ with the Needle’s Eye Snare providing countertraction via the femoral vein. In brief: after deployment of the locking stylet in the lead lumen, the NES was used to grasp the lead in the right atrium and hold it tort while a rotational sheath was used to dissect through the veins. Once the sheath reached the right atrium, the lead was released from the snare and the sheath was used to continue dissection toward the lead tip. Data for all consecutive ‘Tandem’ procedures performed between 1/1/2021 – 1/1/2022 in our high-volume TLE institute were collected and evaluated for safety and efficacy.\n \n \n \n Forty patients aged 69.2±16.3 (70% male), underwent TLE of 75 leads (45 right ventricle, 25, right atrium, 5 left ventricle) with dwell time of 150.1±80.3 months for a non-infectious indication (65%). Of the 40 cases, 27 were hypertensives, 14 had ischaemic heart disease whilst 5 suffered diabetes with a left ventricle ejection fraction of 46.8±10.2%; 12 (30%) were pacing dependent. Procedures were performed by cardiologists in the cardiac catheterisation suite under general anaesthesia (95%) using a locking stylet (100%) with an Evolution RL (11-french 58.7%); a NES 13 millimetres curve (88%) was used to successfully snare 91% of the targeted leads. Complete procedural success was achieved in 92% of leads with 98.7% clinical success. Minor complications occurred in 2 cases (pneumothorax, pocket haematoma requiring intervention), in the absence of any major complications or peri-procedural mortality; there was no 30-day mortality.\n \n \n \n The ‘Tandem’ procedure provides an additional strategy to improve the safety and efficacy of TLE, especially in leads of a long dwell time.\n","PeriodicalId":11720,"journal":{"name":"EP Europace","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EP Europace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac053.535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Type of funding sources: None. Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) has become an important strategy in the management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). A rising population of patients with CIEDs coupled with an expanding indication for TLE, has fuelled demand. There are notable procedural risks however development of techniques and tools have contributed to an improvement in the safety and efficacy of TLE. The mechanical rotational dissecting sheath is safe and efficacious whilst the Needle’s Eye Snare (NES) is an additional ‘bail-out’ strategy contributing to procedural success. We sought to evaluate the outcomes of TLE performed from the superior access in conjunction with counter-traction provided by snaring of the targeted lead via the femoral access. The ‘Tandem’ procedure consisted of the rotational powered sheath performing dissection of the adhesions encapsulating the leads (at the superior access), in ‘Tandem’ with the Needle’s Eye Snare providing countertraction via the femoral vein. In brief: after deployment of the locking stylet in the lead lumen, the NES was used to grasp the lead in the right atrium and hold it tort while a rotational sheath was used to dissect through the veins. Once the sheath reached the right atrium, the lead was released from the snare and the sheath was used to continue dissection toward the lead tip. Data for all consecutive ‘Tandem’ procedures performed between 1/1/2021 – 1/1/2022 in our high-volume TLE institute were collected and evaluated for safety and efficacy. Forty patients aged 69.2±16.3 (70% male), underwent TLE of 75 leads (45 right ventricle, 25, right atrium, 5 left ventricle) with dwell time of 150.1±80.3 months for a non-infectious indication (65%). Of the 40 cases, 27 were hypertensives, 14 had ischaemic heart disease whilst 5 suffered diabetes with a left ventricle ejection fraction of 46.8±10.2%; 12 (30%) were pacing dependent. Procedures were performed by cardiologists in the cardiac catheterisation suite under general anaesthesia (95%) using a locking stylet (100%) with an Evolution RL (11-french 58.7%); a NES 13 millimetres curve (88%) was used to successfully snare 91% of the targeted leads. Complete procedural success was achieved in 92% of leads with 98.7% clinical success. Minor complications occurred in 2 cases (pneumothorax, pocket haematoma requiring intervention), in the absence of any major complications or peri-procedural mortality; there was no 30-day mortality. The ‘Tandem’ procedure provides an additional strategy to improve the safety and efficacy of TLE, especially in leads of a long dwell time.
经静脉铅提取:串联入路
资金来源类型:无。经静脉铅提取(TLE)已成为心脏植入式电子装置(cied)患者治疗的一项重要策略。cied患者人数的增加,加上TLE适应症的扩大,刺激了需求。尽管存在明显的程序风险,但技术和工具的发展有助于提高ttle的安全性和有效性。机械旋转解剖鞘是安全有效的,而针眼网(NES)是一种额外的“纾困”策略,有助于手术成功。我们试图评估从上入路进行TLE的结果,并通过股骨入路诱捕目标导联提供反牵引。“串联”手术包括旋转动力护套剥离包裹导线的粘连(在上通路),“串联”手术采用针眼诱捕器通过股静脉提供反牵引。简而言之:在导联管腔内部署锁定针后,使用NES抓住右心房中的导联并将其固定,同时使用旋转鞘解剖静脉。一旦鞘到达右心房,铅就从圈套中释放出来,鞘被用来继续向铅尖分离。收集2021年1月1日至2022年1月1日期间在我们的大容量TLE研究所进行的所有连续“串联”手术的数据并评估其安全性和有效性。40例患者,年龄69.2±16.3岁(70%男性),接受了75个导联(45个右心室,25个右心房,5个左心室),停留时间150.1±80.3个月,非感染性指征(65%)。高血压27例,缺血性心脏病14例,糖尿病5例,左心室射血分数46.8±10.2%;12例(30%)起搏依赖。手术由心内科医生在全身麻醉(95%)下的心导管室中使用锁定针(100%)和Evolution RL (11-french 58.7%)进行;使用NES 13毫米曲线(88%)成功捕获了91%的目标导联。手术成功率为92%,临床成功率为98.7%。2例发生轻微并发症(气胸、需要干预的口袋血肿),无重大并发症或术中死亡;没有30天死亡率。“串联”程序提供了一种额外的策略来提高TLE的安全性和有效性,特别是在长时间停留的导联中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信