Comparison between Predicted and Measured X-Ray Output in Some Conventional Radiography Units

Calvin Didier Njiki, Yolande Huguette Ebele Yigbedeck, Joseph Eric Martial Ndjaka Manyol, Thierry Ndzana Ndah
{"title":"Comparison between Predicted and Measured X-Ray Output in Some Conventional Radiography Units","authors":"Calvin Didier Njiki, Yolande Huguette Ebele Yigbedeck, Joseph Eric Martial Ndjaka Manyol, Thierry Ndzana Ndah","doi":"10.4236/IJMPCERO.2019.84018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to investigate how accurate are TASMICS and TASMIP \nmodels in predicting the X-ray output of some Conventional Radiology X-ray \nunits with high frequency generators. The X-ray output in microgray per milliampere \nseconds (μGy/mAs) at 100 cm from the X-ray tube was determined \nfor selected high voltages and taking into account the total filtration. The \nX-ray output was then measured directly with the multi-purpose detectors \n(MPD), Raysafe X2. The maximum relative error between measured and predicted \nvalues was found to be equal to 20%. The maximum relative error between \nmeasured and predicted values obtained demonstrates the difficulty of \naccurately predicting the X-ray tube output using TASMICS and TASMIP \nmodels since they are based on fixed anode angles and different composition \nof the tungsten anode.","PeriodicalId":14028,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/IJMPCERO.2019.84018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aims to investigate how accurate are TASMICS and TASMIP models in predicting the X-ray output of some Conventional Radiology X-ray units with high frequency generators. The X-ray output in microgray per milliampere seconds (μGy/mAs) at 100 cm from the X-ray tube was determined for selected high voltages and taking into account the total filtration. The X-ray output was then measured directly with the multi-purpose detectors (MPD), Raysafe X2. The maximum relative error between measured and predicted values was found to be equal to 20%. The maximum relative error between measured and predicted values obtained demonstrates the difficulty of accurately predicting the X-ray tube output using TASMICS and TASMIP models since they are based on fixed anode angles and different composition of the tungsten anode.
一些常规x射线照相设备预测与测量x射线输出的比较
本研究旨在探讨TASMICS和TASMIP模型在预测一些传统放射学高频发生器x射线装置的x射线输出时的准确性。在距离x射线管100 cm处,在考虑总过滤的情况下,确定了以微灰/毫安秒(μGy/mAs)为单位的x射线输出。然后使用多用途探测器(MPD) Raysafe X2直接测量x射线输出。实测值与预测值之间的最大相对误差为20%。得到的实测值和预测值之间的最大相对误差表明,由于TASMICS和TASMIP模型是基于固定的阳极角度和不同的钨阳极组成,因此难以准确预测x射线管输出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信