Early Results of Acetabular Reconstruction After Wide Periacetabular Oncologic Resection

M. Abdel, P. von Roth, K. Perry, P. Rose, D. Lewallen, F. Sim
{"title":"Early Results of Acetabular Reconstruction After Wide Periacetabular Oncologic Resection","authors":"M. Abdel, P. von Roth, K. Perry, P. Rose, D. Lewallen, F. Sim","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.16.00803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Reliable acetabular fixation in total hip arthroplasty following periacetabular resections is challenging. Tantalum components have been successfully implemented for difficult revision arthroplasties, but, to our knowledge, have not been reported for acetabular reconstruction following oncologic periacetabular resection. The primary purpose of the current study was to determine the early clinical outcomes, complications, and radiographic findings for acetabular reconstruction after oncologic periacetabular resection. In addition, a novel classification scheme for primary periacetabular resections and reconstructions is presented. Methods: We reviewed 10 consecutive patients treated with tantalum acetabular reconstruction following periacetabular resection. All patients had a primary acetabular malignancy including chondrosarcoma (n = 7) and osteosarcoma (n = 3). The cohort included 6 males (60%). The mean age was 54 years (range, 30 to 73 years). The mean follow-up was 59 months (range, 8 to 113 months). Results: At the most recent follow-up, 9 patients were alive and 1 had died of the respective disease. All patients obtained full ambulatory status with the use of gait aids. Postoperative complications included dislocation (n = 3), wound-healing disturbance (n = 1), and deep venous thrombosis (n = 1). Two patients underwent reoperations for recurrent dislocations. The mean postoperative Harris hip score was 75 points (range, 49 to 92 points). Conclusions: Preliminary results of tantalum reconstruction following periacetabular resections provide reasonable improvement in early clinical outcomes and stable fixation in situations with massive bone loss and compromised bone quality. As expected due to the lack of a functioning abductor mechanism from the wide oncologic resection, early dislocations remain a concern. As such, we now consider the primary use of increasing constraint, but it must be balanced with the often compromised host bone. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":22579,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery","volume":"02 1","pages":"e9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.00803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Background: Reliable acetabular fixation in total hip arthroplasty following periacetabular resections is challenging. Tantalum components have been successfully implemented for difficult revision arthroplasties, but, to our knowledge, have not been reported for acetabular reconstruction following oncologic periacetabular resection. The primary purpose of the current study was to determine the early clinical outcomes, complications, and radiographic findings for acetabular reconstruction after oncologic periacetabular resection. In addition, a novel classification scheme for primary periacetabular resections and reconstructions is presented. Methods: We reviewed 10 consecutive patients treated with tantalum acetabular reconstruction following periacetabular resection. All patients had a primary acetabular malignancy including chondrosarcoma (n = 7) and osteosarcoma (n = 3). The cohort included 6 males (60%). The mean age was 54 years (range, 30 to 73 years). The mean follow-up was 59 months (range, 8 to 113 months). Results: At the most recent follow-up, 9 patients were alive and 1 had died of the respective disease. All patients obtained full ambulatory status with the use of gait aids. Postoperative complications included dislocation (n = 3), wound-healing disturbance (n = 1), and deep venous thrombosis (n = 1). Two patients underwent reoperations for recurrent dislocations. The mean postoperative Harris hip score was 75 points (range, 49 to 92 points). Conclusions: Preliminary results of tantalum reconstruction following periacetabular resections provide reasonable improvement in early clinical outcomes and stable fixation in situations with massive bone loss and compromised bone quality. As expected due to the lack of a functioning abductor mechanism from the wide oncologic resection, early dislocations remain a concern. As such, we now consider the primary use of increasing constraint, but it must be balanced with the often compromised host bone. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
髋臼周围肿瘤切除术后髋臼重建的早期结果
背景:髋臼周围切除术后全髋关节置换术中可靠的髋臼固定是具有挑战性的。钽假体已成功应用于困难的翻修性关节置换术,但据我们所知,尚未有关于肿瘤髋臼周围切除术后髋臼重建的报道。本研究的主要目的是确定肿瘤髋臼周围切除术后髋臼重建的早期临床结果、并发症和影像学表现。此外,一种新的分类方案,初步髋臼周围切除和重建提出。方法:我们回顾了10例髋臼周围切除术后行钽重建的患者。所有患者均患有原发性髋臼恶性肿瘤,包括软骨肉瘤(n = 7)和骨肉瘤(n = 3)。该队列包括6名男性(60%)。平均年龄54岁(30 ~ 73岁)。平均随访59个月(8 ~ 113个月)。结果:在最近一次随访中,9例患者存活,1例患者死于相应疾病。所有患者在使用步态辅助工具后均可完全走动。术后并发症包括脱位3例,创面愈合障碍1例,深静脉血栓形成1例。2例患者因脱位复发再次手术。术后Harris髋关节平均评分为75分(范围49 ~ 92分)。结论:髋臼周围切除术后钽重建的初步结果可以合理地改善早期临床结果,并稳定固定大量骨丢失和骨质量受损的情况。正如预期的那样,由于广泛肿瘤切除缺乏功能性外展肌机制,早期脱位仍然是一个问题。因此,我们现在考虑增加约束的主要用途,但它必须与经常受损的宿主骨平衡。证据等级:治疗性IV级。完整的证据等级描述见作者指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信