{"title":"Chinese medicine and complexity","authors":"Zhu Jianping, Ken Rose","doi":"10.1054/caom.2002.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Chinese medical theory and complexity theory are two distinct bodies of knowledge concerned with the nature and behavior of natural systems. The former is an artifact from mankind's ancient past; the latter is a vanguard of contemporary science. Yet the basic principles and modes of thinking in these two subjects can be productively compared and employed to make connections between ideas and individuals from apparently disparate backgrounds. These connections may provide insights to all involved. This paper presents some basic comparisons and explores potential ways to begin to construct links between a millennia-old method of traditional medicine and methodologies that lie at the frontiers of modern scientific knowledge. Topics addressed include: the dilemma facing modern Western medicine, the methodology of Chinese medicine, relationships between Chinese medicine and complexity theory, keys to further research, including: language and terminology, analysis of medicinal formulas, analysis of diagnostic and therapeutic principles and procedures, and the application of the metaphoric mode of thinking of Chinese medicine to the investigation of complex adaptive systems. Finally, there is a statement of principles that should be borne in mind by researchers in development of detailed guidelines and criteria for the design of studies and the evaluation of results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100265,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 77-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1054/caom.2002.0008","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1461144902900083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Chinese medical theory and complexity theory are two distinct bodies of knowledge concerned with the nature and behavior of natural systems. The former is an artifact from mankind's ancient past; the latter is a vanguard of contemporary science. Yet the basic principles and modes of thinking in these two subjects can be productively compared and employed to make connections between ideas and individuals from apparently disparate backgrounds. These connections may provide insights to all involved. This paper presents some basic comparisons and explores potential ways to begin to construct links between a millennia-old method of traditional medicine and methodologies that lie at the frontiers of modern scientific knowledge. Topics addressed include: the dilemma facing modern Western medicine, the methodology of Chinese medicine, relationships between Chinese medicine and complexity theory, keys to further research, including: language and terminology, analysis of medicinal formulas, analysis of diagnostic and therapeutic principles and procedures, and the application of the metaphoric mode of thinking of Chinese medicine to the investigation of complex adaptive systems. Finally, there is a statement of principles that should be borne in mind by researchers in development of detailed guidelines and criteria for the design of studies and the evaluation of results.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
