Effective or Impractical? Discussing Students' Perceptions toward Learning Management Systems in English Language Learning

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Aminah Suriaman, Konder Manurung, Mukrim Mukrim, Aisah Apridayani, Agussatriana Agussatriana
{"title":"Effective or Impractical? Discussing Students' Perceptions toward Learning Management Systems in English Language Learning","authors":"Aminah Suriaman, Konder Manurung, Mukrim Mukrim, Aisah Apridayani, Agussatriana Agussatriana","doi":"10.26858/ijole.v7i2.43495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning Management System (LMS) platform is currently popularly used by universities or institutions as an e-learning platform based. Currently, it may be utilized successfully as a platform to engage students in a classroom context. This study aims to determine the use of the learning management system (LMS) in English language learning based on the analysis of students' perceptions and to establish whether the platforms used contributed to the learning goals in the English Department at Tadulako University. The research design utilizes the descriptive qualitative research method. The finding of the study indicated that learners expressed both sides of the usage of the LMS platform in English language learning; effective and impractical perception. It is effective because the LMS platform improved their comprehension, promoted independent learning, inspired students to complete all tasks and quizzes, and eventually allowed students to achieve good learning outcomes. Meanwhile, for impractical usage, the LMS platform has network instability and limited opportunity for real-time discussion and gets immediate feedback from lecturers.  However, the benefits of the LMS platform outweigh its drawbacks.","PeriodicalId":40801,"journal":{"name":"IJoLE-International Journal of Language Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJoLE-International Journal of Language Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v7i2.43495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Learning Management System (LMS) platform is currently popularly used by universities or institutions as an e-learning platform based. Currently, it may be utilized successfully as a platform to engage students in a classroom context. This study aims to determine the use of the learning management system (LMS) in English language learning based on the analysis of students' perceptions and to establish whether the platforms used contributed to the learning goals in the English Department at Tadulako University. The research design utilizes the descriptive qualitative research method. The finding of the study indicated that learners expressed both sides of the usage of the LMS platform in English language learning; effective and impractical perception. It is effective because the LMS platform improved their comprehension, promoted independent learning, inspired students to complete all tasks and quizzes, and eventually allowed students to achieve good learning outcomes. Meanwhile, for impractical usage, the LMS platform has network instability and limited opportunity for real-time discussion and gets immediate feedback from lecturers.  However, the benefits of the LMS platform outweigh its drawbacks.
有效还是不切实际?探讨学生对英语学习管理系统的看法
学习管理系统(LMS)平台是目前高校或机构普遍使用的基于电子学习的平台。目前,它可以成功地作为一个平台,让学生参与到课堂环境中。本研究旨在通过对学生认知的分析,确定学习管理系统(LMS)在英语语言学习中的使用情况,并确定所使用的平台是否有助于Tadulako大学英语系的学习目标。本研究设计采用描述性质的研究方法。研究结果表明,学习者对LMS平台在英语学习中的使用表达了两方面的看法;有效的和不切实际的感知。之所以有效,是因为LMS平台提高了学生的理解力,促进了学生的自主学习,激励学生完成所有的任务和测验,最终让学生取得了良好的学习成果。同时,由于使用不实际,LMS平台网络不稳定,实时讨论的机会有限,讲师的反馈也很及时。然而,LMS平台的优点大于缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信