Deus ille noster: Platonic Precedent and the Construction of the Interlocutors in Cicero's De oratore

IF 0.7 1区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
W. Stull
{"title":"Deus ille noster: Platonic Precedent and the Construction of the Interlocutors in Cicero's De oratore","authors":"W. Stull","doi":"10.1353/APA.2011.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a letter to Atticus defending the treatment of Scaevola in De oratore, Cicero appeals both to the example of Plato, \"that god of ours,\" and to the memory of what the real Scaevola was actually like. Turning from the letter to De oratore itself, I show how this juxtaposition of Platonic divinity and Roman memory reflects a pattern present in the prefaces to each of the three books. I argue that Cicero presents his characters, in pointed response to Plato in general and the Phaedrus in particular, in such a way as to privilege history and oratory over philosophy.","PeriodicalId":46223,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the American Philological Association","volume":"19 1","pages":"247 - 263"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the American Philological Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/APA.2011.0015","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In a letter to Atticus defending the treatment of Scaevola in De oratore, Cicero appeals both to the example of Plato, "that god of ours," and to the memory of what the real Scaevola was actually like. Turning from the letter to De oratore itself, I show how this juxtaposition of Platonic divinity and Roman memory reflects a pattern present in the prefaces to each of the three books. I argue that Cicero presents his characters, in pointed response to Plato in general and the Phaedrus in particular, in such a way as to privilege history and oratory over philosophy.
魔鬼:柏拉图的先例与西塞罗《论oratore》中对话者的建构
在给阿提克斯的一封信中,西塞罗为《论奥拉托雷》中对斯卡沃拉的处理进行了辩护,他以柏拉图为例,“我们的神”,并回忆起真正的斯卡沃拉是什么样子。从这封信转到《德·奥拉托雷》本身,我将展示柏拉图式的神性和罗马人的记忆的并置如何反映出这三本书的序言中呈现的一种模式。我认为西塞罗在对柏拉图,尤其是《费德鲁斯篇》的尖锐回应中,以这样一种方式,将历史和演讲置于哲学之上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Transactions of the APA (TAPA) is the official research publication of the American Philological Association. TAPA reflects the wide range and high quality of research currently undertaken by classicists. Highlights of every issue include: The Presidential Address from the previous year"s conference and Paragraphoi a reflection on the material and response to issues raised in the issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信