Acute high-intensity interval exercise versus moderate-intensity continuous exercise in heated water-based on hemodynamic, cardiac autonomic, and vascular responses in older individuals with hypertension

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
I. Roque Marçal, Vanessa Teixeira Do Amaral, Bianca Fernandes, Raphael Martins de Abreu, Cristian Alvarez, Guilherme Veiga Guimarães, V. Cornelissen, Emmanuel Gomes Ciolac
{"title":"Acute high-intensity interval exercise versus moderate-intensity continuous exercise in heated water-based on hemodynamic, cardiac autonomic, and vascular responses in older individuals with hypertension","authors":"I. Roque Marçal, Vanessa Teixeira Do Amaral, Bianca Fernandes, Raphael Martins de Abreu, Cristian Alvarez, Guilherme Veiga Guimarães, V. Cornelissen, Emmanuel Gomes Ciolac","doi":"10.1080/10641963.2022.2065288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objectives This crossover study design aimed to assess hemodynamic, cardiac autonomic, and vascular responses to high-intensity interval (HIIE) vs moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICE) in older individuals with hypertension. Methods Twenty (67 ± 7 y) older individuals with hypertension were randomly assigned to perform HIIE, MICE, or control (CON) sessions in the heated swimming pool (30–32°C). Blood pressure (BP), arterial stiffness, endothelial reactivity, and heart rate variability (HRV) were measured pre, post, and 45 min (recovery) after each intervention followed by 24-h ambulatory BP and HRV. Results One single aerobic exercise session was not effective to provoke post-exercise hypotension and vascular improvements. HIIE was superior to MICE and CON to increasing parasympathetic modulation at post and recovery. Exercise sessions showed to disturb the autonomic system at nighttime compared to CON. Conclusions These results may have important implications in water-based therapy and the elderly with hypertension","PeriodicalId":10333,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Hypertension","volume":"1 1","pages":"427 - 435"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10641963.2022.2065288","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives This crossover study design aimed to assess hemodynamic, cardiac autonomic, and vascular responses to high-intensity interval (HIIE) vs moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICE) in older individuals with hypertension. Methods Twenty (67 ± 7 y) older individuals with hypertension were randomly assigned to perform HIIE, MICE, or control (CON) sessions in the heated swimming pool (30–32°C). Blood pressure (BP), arterial stiffness, endothelial reactivity, and heart rate variability (HRV) were measured pre, post, and 45 min (recovery) after each intervention followed by 24-h ambulatory BP and HRV. Results One single aerobic exercise session was not effective to provoke post-exercise hypotension and vascular improvements. HIIE was superior to MICE and CON to increasing parasympathetic modulation at post and recovery. Exercise sessions showed to disturb the autonomic system at nighttime compared to CON. Conclusions These results may have important implications in water-based therapy and the elderly with hypertension
老年高血压患者急性高强度间歇运动与中等强度连续热水运动的血流动力学、心脏自主神经和血管反应对比
目的:本交叉研究旨在评估老年高血压患者在高强度间歇运动(HIIE)与中强度连续运动(MICE)时的血流动力学、心脏自主神经和血管反应。方法将20例(67±7岁)老年高血压患者随机分为HIIE组、小鼠组和对照组(CON),分别在30-32°C的温水游泳池中进行实验。测量血压(BP)、动脉硬度、内皮反应性和心率变异性(HRV),并在每次干预前、后和45分钟(恢复)后测量24小时动态血压和HRV。结果单次有氧运动不能引起运动后低血压和血管改善。HIIE在增强恢复后和恢复后副交感神经调节方面优于小鼠和CON。与对照组相比,夜间运动可干扰自主神经系统。结论这些结果可能对水基疗法和老年高血压患者有重要意义
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.80%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Hypertension is a reputable journal that has converted to a full Open Access format starting from Volume 45 in 2023. While previous volumes are still accessible through a Pay to Read model, the journal now provides free and open access to its content. It serves as an international platform for the exchange of up-to-date scientific and clinical information concerning both human and animal hypertension. The journal publishes a wide range of articles, including full research papers, solicited and unsolicited reviews, and commentaries. Through these publications, the journal aims to enhance current understanding and support the timely detection, management, control, and prevention of hypertension-related conditions. One notable aspect of Clinical and Experimental Hypertension is its coverage of special issues that focus on the proceedings of symposia dedicated to hypertension research. This feature allows researchers and clinicians to delve deeper into the latest advancements in this field. The journal is abstracted and indexed in several renowned databases, including Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes News (Online), Reactions Weekly (Online), CABI, EBSCOhost, Elsevier BV, International Atomic Energy Agency, and the National Library of Medicine, among others. These affiliations ensure that the journal's content receives broad visibility and facilitates its discoverability by professionals and researchers in related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信