The Fundamentalist Utopia of Gennady Shimanov from the 1960S-1980s

Q2 Social Sciences
Mikhail D. Suslov
{"title":"The Fundamentalist Utopia of Gennady Shimanov from the 1960S-1980s","authors":"Mikhail D. Suslov","doi":"10.3200/DEMO.17.4.324-349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the leadership of Leonid Brezhnev between 1964 and 1982, Soviet cultural ideology underwent barely visible yet crucially important ideological changes. The staunch Marxist-Leninist paradigm succumbed to a more pragmatic orientation. Self-sustaining existence at \"cold peace\" with society became a principal objective of the ruling elite. Evaporation of an official ideology prompted a compromise with the upper levels of society, and drove the regime toward a reluctant recognition of some new ideological schemes, combining Leninism and nationalistic populism. (1) There are various points of comparison between late Imperial Russia, modern Russia after 2000, and the advent of nationalism during the Brezhnev era. In the late nineteenth century, when the model of the \"enlightened monarchy\" was exhausted in Imperial Russia, the tsar and his camarilla were impelled to increasingly employ populist rhetoric and promote an ideological model of the \"people's monarchy,\" exemplified by Slavophiles and their followers. (2) The decrepit Soviet Empire reflected a similar intellectual context in its final decades. In both cases, a tangible opposition from the right appeared, painfully observing what it saw as \"pernicious changes\" and large-scale societal decline. The \"revolutionaries from the right,\" (3) both in late Imperial Russia and in Brezhnev's USSR, manifested a blend of conservatism, xenophobia and Orthodox pietism under the ideological umbrella of Slavophilism. The latter served as a referent ideology and a guiding star for many dissidents. (4) In Russia today, the agreement between the siloviki (security and military) group, certain oligarchs, church hierarchy, and radical right-wing ideologists is obvious. (5) The Eurasian Movement, headed by Aleksandr Dugin, has been especially influential among top political leadership, and is becoming popular in Russian academia and the mass media. (6) The most recent resurgence of modern Slavophilism can be seen Mikhail Iur'ev's provocative text The Fortress Russia (2004), which suggests economic and political isolationism, closure of cultural and academic ties with the West, introduction of an old Russian nonmetric system of measure, rejection of the principle of separation of powers, implantation of a military perspective and rigorous Orthodoxy, and promotion of the concept of Moscow as the \"Third Rome.\" (7) Iur'ev is no political outsider, but the President of Eurofinance Group, one of the richest Russians, former Deputy Speaker of the State Duma, and an active member of Dugin's Eurasian Movement. All different tendencies of modern Russian traditionalism, Slavophilism and religious fundamentalism can be grouped together under the banner of the \"Russian idea,\" (8) or, more specifically, the \"Russian Doctrine,\" as formulated in 2005 and supported by conservative intellectuals of Orthodox background such as Egor Kholmogorov, Mikhail Leont'ev, Dmitri Rogozin, and Natalia Narochnitskaia. (9) This ideology is based on the revised fundamentals of Russian Messianism: Russian uniqueness, the spirituality of the Russian people in contrast to the character of the West, the need for a strong state, economic autonomy, Orthodoxy as the spiritual core of the Russian people, and Russia as the \"Northern\"--the Eurasian--civilization, challenging the corrupt Atlantic civilization. The Russian Doctrine movement, having amassed considerable economic and political capital and provided itself with the quasi-academic \"school of studies on conservatism,\" is a serious political player, which gives another chance to Soviet underground fundamentalists. (10) Since 2000, former conservative dissidents like Gennady Shimanov, Leonid Borodin and Vladimir Osipov have become noticeably more active in political journalism and politics and have published memoirs and collections of articles. (11) This present study concerns the ideological stirrings of this movement during the Soviet period. The Setting for Fundamentalist Revival Slavophilism and nostalgia for old rural Russia were espoused by Soviet intellectuals shortly after Nikita Khrushchev's dismissal from power in 1964. …","PeriodicalId":39667,"journal":{"name":"Demokratizatsiya","volume":"27 1","pages":"324-349"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Demokratizatsiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3200/DEMO.17.4.324-349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the leadership of Leonid Brezhnev between 1964 and 1982, Soviet cultural ideology underwent barely visible yet crucially important ideological changes. The staunch Marxist-Leninist paradigm succumbed to a more pragmatic orientation. Self-sustaining existence at "cold peace" with society became a principal objective of the ruling elite. Evaporation of an official ideology prompted a compromise with the upper levels of society, and drove the regime toward a reluctant recognition of some new ideological schemes, combining Leninism and nationalistic populism. (1) There are various points of comparison between late Imperial Russia, modern Russia after 2000, and the advent of nationalism during the Brezhnev era. In the late nineteenth century, when the model of the "enlightened monarchy" was exhausted in Imperial Russia, the tsar and his camarilla were impelled to increasingly employ populist rhetoric and promote an ideological model of the "people's monarchy," exemplified by Slavophiles and their followers. (2) The decrepit Soviet Empire reflected a similar intellectual context in its final decades. In both cases, a tangible opposition from the right appeared, painfully observing what it saw as "pernicious changes" and large-scale societal decline. The "revolutionaries from the right," (3) both in late Imperial Russia and in Brezhnev's USSR, manifested a blend of conservatism, xenophobia and Orthodox pietism under the ideological umbrella of Slavophilism. The latter served as a referent ideology and a guiding star for many dissidents. (4) In Russia today, the agreement between the siloviki (security and military) group, certain oligarchs, church hierarchy, and radical right-wing ideologists is obvious. (5) The Eurasian Movement, headed by Aleksandr Dugin, has been especially influential among top political leadership, and is becoming popular in Russian academia and the mass media. (6) The most recent resurgence of modern Slavophilism can be seen Mikhail Iur'ev's provocative text The Fortress Russia (2004), which suggests economic and political isolationism, closure of cultural and academic ties with the West, introduction of an old Russian nonmetric system of measure, rejection of the principle of separation of powers, implantation of a military perspective and rigorous Orthodoxy, and promotion of the concept of Moscow as the "Third Rome." (7) Iur'ev is no political outsider, but the President of Eurofinance Group, one of the richest Russians, former Deputy Speaker of the State Duma, and an active member of Dugin's Eurasian Movement. All different tendencies of modern Russian traditionalism, Slavophilism and religious fundamentalism can be grouped together under the banner of the "Russian idea," (8) or, more specifically, the "Russian Doctrine," as formulated in 2005 and supported by conservative intellectuals of Orthodox background such as Egor Kholmogorov, Mikhail Leont'ev, Dmitri Rogozin, and Natalia Narochnitskaia. (9) This ideology is based on the revised fundamentals of Russian Messianism: Russian uniqueness, the spirituality of the Russian people in contrast to the character of the West, the need for a strong state, economic autonomy, Orthodoxy as the spiritual core of the Russian people, and Russia as the "Northern"--the Eurasian--civilization, challenging the corrupt Atlantic civilization. The Russian Doctrine movement, having amassed considerable economic and political capital and provided itself with the quasi-academic "school of studies on conservatism," is a serious political player, which gives another chance to Soviet underground fundamentalists. (10) Since 2000, former conservative dissidents like Gennady Shimanov, Leonid Borodin and Vladimir Osipov have become noticeably more active in political journalism and politics and have published memoirs and collections of articles. (11) This present study concerns the ideological stirrings of this movement during the Soviet period. The Setting for Fundamentalist Revival Slavophilism and nostalgia for old rural Russia were espoused by Soviet intellectuals shortly after Nikita Khrushchev's dismissal from power in 1964. …
60 - 80年代根纳季·希马诺夫的原教旨主义乌托邦
在列昂尼德·勃列日涅夫(Leonid Brezhnev) 1964年至1982年的领导期间,苏联的文化意识形态经历了几乎不可见但至关重要的意识形态变化。坚定的马克思列宁主义范式屈服于更务实的方向。与社会“冷和平”的自我维持成为统治精英的主要目标。官方意识形态的消失促使了与上层社会的妥协,并迫使政权不情愿地承认一些新的意识形态方案,结合了列宁主义和民族主义民粹主义。(1)在帝国晚期的俄罗斯、2000年后的现代俄罗斯和勃列日涅夫时代民族主义的出现之间有很多比较点。在19世纪后期,当“开明君主制”的模式在俄罗斯帝国被耗尽时,沙皇和他的党团被迫越来越多地使用民粹主义的言论,并推广一种“人民君主制”的意识形态模式,以斯拉夫派及其追随者为例。衰颓的苏联帝国在其最后几十年也反映出类似的知识背景。在这两种情况下,都出现了来自右翼的切实反对,痛苦地观察着他们所认为的“有害变化”和大规模的社会衰退。“来自右翼的革命者”,无论是在帝国晚期的俄罗斯,还是在勃列日涅夫的苏联,在斯拉夫主义的意识形态保护伞下,表现出一种保守主义、排外主义和东正教虔诚主义的混合体。后者是许多持不同政见者的参考意识形态和指路明灯。在今天的俄罗斯,siloviki(安全和军事)集团、某些寡头、教会等级和激进的右翼意识形态之间的协议是显而易见的。(5)亚历山大·杜金(Aleksandr Dugin)领导的“欧亚运动”(Eurasian Movement)在俄罗斯最高政治领导层中尤其具有影响力,在俄罗斯学术界和大众媒体中越来越受欢迎。(6)现代斯拉夫主义最近的复兴可以从米哈伊尔·尤尔耶夫(Mikhail iurev)的挑衅性文本《俄罗斯堡垒》(2004)中看到,该文本建议在经济和政治上实行孤立主义,关闭与西方的文化和学术联系,引入古老的俄罗斯非公制度量体系,拒绝三权分立原则,植入军事观点和严格的东正教,并促进莫斯科作为“第三罗马”的概念。(7)尤尔耶夫不是政治局外人,而是欧洲金融集团的总裁,俄罗斯最富有的人之一,前国家杜马副议长,杜金欧亚运动的积极成员。现代俄罗斯传统主义、斯拉夫主义和宗教原教旨主义的所有不同倾向都可以在“俄罗斯思想”的旗帜下归类,或者更具体地说,是2005年制定的“俄罗斯主义”,并得到了东正教背景的保守知识分子的支持,如叶戈尔·霍莫戈罗夫、米哈伊尔·列奥涅夫、德米特里·罗戈津和纳塔利娅·纳罗奇尼茨卡娅。(9)这一意识形态是基于修正后的俄罗斯弥赛亚主义的基本原则:俄罗斯的独特性,俄罗斯人民与西方性格形成对比的精神性,对强大国家的需求,经济自治,东正教是俄罗斯人民的精神核心,俄罗斯作为“北方”——欧亚文明,挑战腐败的大西洋文明。俄罗斯主义运动积累了大量的经济和政治资本,并为自己提供了准学术的“保守主义研究学派”,是一个严肃的政治参与者,这给了苏联地下原教旨主义者另一个机会。自2000年以来,像根纳季·希马诺夫、列昂尼德·鲍罗丁和弗拉基米尔·奥西波夫这样的前保守派持不同政见者在政治新闻和政治领域明显变得更加活跃,并出版了回忆录和文集。(11)本研究涉及苏联时期这一运动的意识形态骚动。在尼基塔·赫鲁晓夫1964年被免职后不久,苏联知识分子就支持原教旨主义复兴斯拉夫主义和对老俄罗斯农村的怀念。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Demokratizatsiya
Demokratizatsiya Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Occupying a unique niche among literary journals, ANQ is filled with short, incisive research-based articles about the literature of the English-speaking world and the language of literature. Contributors unravel obscure allusions, explain sources and analogues, and supply variant manuscript readings. Also included are Old English word studies, textual emendations, and rare correspondence from neglected archives. The journal is an essential source for professors and students, as well as archivists, bibliographers, biographers, editors, lexicographers, and textual scholars. With subjects from Chaucer and Milton to Fitzgerald and Welty, ANQ delves into the heart of literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信