Uncovering the Origins of Instability in Dynamical Systems: How Can the Attention Mechanism Help?

N. Bahador, M. Lankarany
{"title":"Uncovering the Origins of Instability in Dynamical Systems: How Can the Attention Mechanism Help?","authors":"N. Bahador, M. Lankarany","doi":"10.3390/dynamics3020013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The behavior of the network and its stability are governed by both dynamics of the individual nodes, as well as their topological interconnections. The attention mechanism as an integral part of neural network models was initially designed for natural language processing (NLP) and, so far, has shown excellent performance in combining the dynamics of individual nodes and the coupling strengths between them within a network. Despite the undoubted impact of the attention mechanism, it is not yet clear why some nodes of a network obtain higher attention weights. To come up with more explainable solutions, we tried to look at the problem from a stability perspective. Based on stability theory, negative connections in a network can create feedback loops or other complex structures by allowing information to flow in the opposite direction. These structures play a critical role in the dynamics of a complex system and can contribute to abnormal synchronization, amplification, or suppression. We hypothesized that those nodes that are involved in organizing such structures could push the entire network into instability modes and therefore need more attention during analysis. To test this hypothesis, the attention mechanism, along with spectral and topological stability analyses, was performed on a real-world numerical problem, i.e., a linear Multi-Input Multi-Output state-space model of a piezoelectric tube actuator. The findings of our study suggest that the attention should be directed toward the collective behavior of imbalanced structures and polarity-driven structural instabilities within the network. The results demonstrated that the nodes receiving more attention cause more instability in the system. Our study provides a proof of concept to understand why perturbing some nodes of a network may cause dramatic changes in the network dynamics.","PeriodicalId":80276,"journal":{"name":"Dynamics (Pembroke, Ont.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dynamics (Pembroke, Ont.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dynamics3020013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The behavior of the network and its stability are governed by both dynamics of the individual nodes, as well as their topological interconnections. The attention mechanism as an integral part of neural network models was initially designed for natural language processing (NLP) and, so far, has shown excellent performance in combining the dynamics of individual nodes and the coupling strengths between them within a network. Despite the undoubted impact of the attention mechanism, it is not yet clear why some nodes of a network obtain higher attention weights. To come up with more explainable solutions, we tried to look at the problem from a stability perspective. Based on stability theory, negative connections in a network can create feedback loops or other complex structures by allowing information to flow in the opposite direction. These structures play a critical role in the dynamics of a complex system and can contribute to abnormal synchronization, amplification, or suppression. We hypothesized that those nodes that are involved in organizing such structures could push the entire network into instability modes and therefore need more attention during analysis. To test this hypothesis, the attention mechanism, along with spectral and topological stability analyses, was performed on a real-world numerical problem, i.e., a linear Multi-Input Multi-Output state-space model of a piezoelectric tube actuator. The findings of our study suggest that the attention should be directed toward the collective behavior of imbalanced structures and polarity-driven structural instabilities within the network. The results demonstrated that the nodes receiving more attention cause more instability in the system. Our study provides a proof of concept to understand why perturbing some nodes of a network may cause dramatic changes in the network dynamics.
揭示动力系统不稳定性的起源:注意机制如何起作用?
网络的行为及其稳定性既受单个节点的动态控制,也受其拓扑互连的控制。注意机制作为神经网络模型的一个组成部分,最初是为自然语言处理(NLP)而设计的,到目前为止,它在结合网络中单个节点的动态和它们之间的耦合强度方面表现出了优异的性能。尽管注意机制的影响毋庸置疑,但目前尚不清楚为什么网络中的某些节点会获得更高的注意权重。为了提出更可解释的解决方案,我们试图从稳定性的角度来看待这个问题。根据稳定性理论,网络中的负连接可以通过允许信息向相反方向流动来创建反馈回路或其他复杂结构。这些结构在复杂系统的动力学中起着至关重要的作用,并可能导致异常同步、放大或抑制。我们假设那些参与组织这种结构的节点可能会将整个网络推入不稳定模式,因此在分析时需要更多的关注。为了验证这一假设,对一个现实世界的数值问题,即压电管驱动器的线性多输入多输出状态空间模型,进行了注意机制以及频谱和拓扑稳定性分析。我们的研究结果表明,应该关注网络中不平衡结构的集体行为和极性驱动的结构不稳定性。结果表明,受关注的节点越多,系统的不稳定性越大。我们的研究提供了一个概念证明,以理解为什么干扰网络的一些节点可能会导致网络动态的巨大变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信