Grounding rules for (relevant) implication

Q1 Arts and Humanities
F. Poggiolesi
{"title":"Grounding rules for (relevant) implication","authors":"F. Poggiolesi","doi":"10.1080/11663081.2020.1850048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Poggiolesi [(2020a). Grounding principles for (relevant) implication. Synthese, 1–28], a definition of the notion of grounding in the background of a relevant framework has been introduced; this definition generates some intuitively acceptable grounding principles for relevant implication. In the present paper, our aim is to construct a logic based on that definition. Our logic will be a calculus of natural deduction and will formalise the relation of grounding both as a meta-linguistic relation and as a connective. The calculus will contain grounding rules for relevant implication and will be proved to be sound and complete with respect to the original definition. Finally we will prove the deduction theorem at the grounding level.","PeriodicalId":38573,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics","volume":"96 1","pages":"26 - 55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11663081.2020.1850048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In Poggiolesi [(2020a). Grounding principles for (relevant) implication. Synthese, 1–28], a definition of the notion of grounding in the background of a relevant framework has been introduced; this definition generates some intuitively acceptable grounding principles for relevant implication. In the present paper, our aim is to construct a logic based on that definition. Our logic will be a calculus of natural deduction and will formalise the relation of grounding both as a meta-linguistic relation and as a connective. The calculus will contain grounding rules for relevant implication and will be proved to be sound and complete with respect to the original definition. Finally we will prove the deduction theorem at the grounding level.
(相关)暗示的基础规则
在Poggiolesi [(2020a).](相关)暗示的基本原则。Synthese, 1-28],在相关框架的背景下介绍了接地概念的定义;这个定义为相关含义产生了一些直观上可接受的基础原则。在本文中,我们的目标是基于该定义构建一个逻辑。我们的逻辑将是自然演绎的演算,并将基础关系形式化为元语言关系和连接关系。微积分将包含相关含义的基本规则,并将被证明是相对于原始定义的健全和完整的。最后,我们将在基础层面证明演绎定理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics
Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信