THE LEGAL ESSENCE OF THE ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE: A BRIEF COMPARATIVE HISTORICAL AND LEGAL ANALYSIS

V. Budkevych
{"title":"THE LEGAL ESSENCE OF THE ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE: A BRIEF COMPARATIVE HISTORICAL AND LEGAL ANALYSIS","authors":"V. Budkevych","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2023.1.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the scientific paper is to explore the foreign and national historical preconditions and the logic of the development of the sub-institute of electronic evidence, with a primary focus on the administrative proceeding in Ukraine, based on the documented factual data of different periods. Considering the theoretical nature of the present research, the main research methods used in the course of its preparation are as follows: combination of historical and logical, systematic method, methods of comparison, description, generalization, synthesis and induction, convergence from general to local. As a result of the research the main trends of the development of the sub-institute of electronic evidence in the administrative proceeding during different historical periods were studied, with a special emphasis on the foreign pre-history of the emergence and the development of the legal provisions related to electronic evidence. Key findings (conclusions) of the study are briefly summarized below. The legal provisions on electronic evidence have been subject to numerous amendments beginning from the 1970th, when they were firstly implemented in the procedural legislation in United States of America. Considering the fact that the matter of periodization is always an open question, in the author’s view the historical development of the regulation regarding electronic evidence may be divided into four main periods: 1) From the 1970th to the early 1990th (this period is related to the emergence of the first national cases of specific legislation, forensic practices and scientific researches); 2) From the 1970th to the early 2000th (when the transformation of the approaches to the understanding of the electronic evidence’s essence happened, and the issue on the autonomous role of electronic evidence within the system of evidence was raised); 3) From 2000 to 2010 (this period is associated with the active development of the legislation and the legal practice on the electronic evidence); 4) From 2010 till nowadays ( this is the present stage of the legal provisions on the electronic evidence’s development, when a special definition and procedural rules for electronic evidence were implemented into the national procedural codes, including the Code of the Administrative Procedure of Ukraine).","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative law and process","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2023.1.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the scientific paper is to explore the foreign and national historical preconditions and the logic of the development of the sub-institute of electronic evidence, with a primary focus on the administrative proceeding in Ukraine, based on the documented factual data of different periods. Considering the theoretical nature of the present research, the main research methods used in the course of its preparation are as follows: combination of historical and logical, systematic method, methods of comparison, description, generalization, synthesis and induction, convergence from general to local. As a result of the research the main trends of the development of the sub-institute of electronic evidence in the administrative proceeding during different historical periods were studied, with a special emphasis on the foreign pre-history of the emergence and the development of the legal provisions related to electronic evidence. Key findings (conclusions) of the study are briefly summarized below. The legal provisions on electronic evidence have been subject to numerous amendments beginning from the 1970th, when they were firstly implemented in the procedural legislation in United States of America. Considering the fact that the matter of periodization is always an open question, in the author’s view the historical development of the regulation regarding electronic evidence may be divided into four main periods: 1) From the 1970th to the early 1990th (this period is related to the emergence of the first national cases of specific legislation, forensic practices and scientific researches); 2) From the 1970th to the early 2000th (when the transformation of the approaches to the understanding of the electronic evidence’s essence happened, and the issue on the autonomous role of electronic evidence within the system of evidence was raised); 3) From 2000 to 2010 (this period is associated with the active development of the legislation and the legal practice on the electronic evidence); 4) From 2010 till nowadays ( this is the present stage of the legal provisions on the electronic evidence’s development, when a special definition and procedural rules for electronic evidence were implemented into the national procedural codes, including the Code of the Administrative Procedure of Ukraine).
行政诉讼中电子证据的法律本质:简要比较历史与法律分析
这篇科学论文的目的是基于不同时期的文献事实数据,以乌克兰的行政诉讼为重点,探讨国外和国内电子证据分支机构发展的历史前提和逻辑。考虑到本研究的理论性质,其准备过程中主要采用的研究方法有:历史与逻辑相结合、系统方法、比较法、描述法、概括法、综合归纳法、由一般向局部收敛法。通过研究,分析了不同历史时期行政诉讼中电子证据分支机构发展的主要趋势,并着重分析了国外电子证据产生的前沿史和相关法律规定的发展。本研究的主要发现(结论)简述如下。关于电子证据的法律规定自20世纪70年代在美利坚合众国的程序立法中首次实施以来,已经过多次修订。考虑到电子证据的分期问题一直是一个悬而未决的问题,笔者认为,电子证据规制的历史发展可以分为四个主要时期:从20世纪70年代到90年代初(这一时期与第一批具体立法、司法实践和科学研究的国家案例的出现有关);(2) 20世纪70年代至21世纪初(认识电子证据本质的途径发生转变,提出了电子证据在证据体系中的自主作用问题);3) 2000年至2010年(这一时期是电子证据立法和法律实践积极发展的时期);4) 2010年至今(这是电子证据法律规定发展的现阶段,包括乌克兰行政程序法在内的国家程序法都对电子证据进行了专门的定义和程序规则)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信