C. Sinn, Zain Pasat, Lindsay Klea, S. Hogeveen, Ceara Holditch, C. Beltzner, A. Costa
{"title":"A maturity model framework for integrated virtual care","authors":"C. Sinn, Zain Pasat, Lindsay Klea, S. Hogeveen, Ceara Holditch, C. Beltzner, A. Costa","doi":"10.1108/jica-02-2022-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeRemote patient monitoring (RPM) and virtual visits have the potential to transform care delivery and outcomes but require intentional planning around how these technologies contribute to integrated care. Since maturity models are useful frameworks for understanding current performance and motivating progress, the authors developed a model describing the features of RPM that can advance integrated care.Design/methodology/approachThis work was led by St. Joseph's Health System Centre for Integrated Care in collaboration with clinical and programme leads and frontline staff offering RPM services as part of Connected Health Hamilton in Ontario, Canada. Development of the maturity model was informed by a review of existing telehealth maturity models, online stakeholder meetings, and online interviews with clinical leads, programme leads, and staff.FindingsThe maturity model comprises 4 maturity levels and 17 sub-domains organised into 5 domains: Technology, Team Organisation, Programme Support, Integrated Information Systems, and Performance and Quality. An implementation pillars checklist identifies additional considerations for sustaining programmes at any maturity level. Finally, the authors apply one of Connected Health Hamilton's RPM programmes to the Team Organisation domain as an example of the maturity model in action.Originality/valueThis work extends previous telehealth maturity models by focussing on the arrangement of resources, teams, and processes needed to support the delivery of integrated care. Although the model is inspired by local programmes, the model is highly transferable to other RPM programmes.","PeriodicalId":51837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrated Care","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrated Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jica-02-2022-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
PurposeRemote patient monitoring (RPM) and virtual visits have the potential to transform care delivery and outcomes but require intentional planning around how these technologies contribute to integrated care. Since maturity models are useful frameworks for understanding current performance and motivating progress, the authors developed a model describing the features of RPM that can advance integrated care.Design/methodology/approachThis work was led by St. Joseph's Health System Centre for Integrated Care in collaboration with clinical and programme leads and frontline staff offering RPM services as part of Connected Health Hamilton in Ontario, Canada. Development of the maturity model was informed by a review of existing telehealth maturity models, online stakeholder meetings, and online interviews with clinical leads, programme leads, and staff.FindingsThe maturity model comprises 4 maturity levels and 17 sub-domains organised into 5 domains: Technology, Team Organisation, Programme Support, Integrated Information Systems, and Performance and Quality. An implementation pillars checklist identifies additional considerations for sustaining programmes at any maturity level. Finally, the authors apply one of Connected Health Hamilton's RPM programmes to the Team Organisation domain as an example of the maturity model in action.Originality/valueThis work extends previous telehealth maturity models by focussing on the arrangement of resources, teams, and processes needed to support the delivery of integrated care. Although the model is inspired by local programmes, the model is highly transferable to other RPM programmes.
目的:远程患者监护(RPM)和虚拟就诊有可能改变护理服务和结果,但需要围绕这些技术如何促进综合护理进行有意识的规划。由于成熟度模型是理解当前绩效和激励进展的有用框架,因此作者开发了一个描述RPM特征的模型,该模型可以推进综合护理。设计/方法/方法这项工作由圣约瑟夫综合护理卫生系统中心领导,与临床和项目领导以及一线工作人员合作,提供RPM服务,作为加拿大安大略省汉密尔顿互联健康的一部分。对现有远程保健成熟度模型的审查、在线利益攸关方会议以及与临床负责人、方案负责人和工作人员的在线访谈为成熟度模型的制定提供了信息。成熟度模型包括4个成熟度级别和17个子领域,分为5个领域:技术、团队组织、计划支持、综合信息系统和绩效与质量。实施支柱清单确定了在任何成熟度级别维持方案的其他考虑因素。最后,作者将Connected Health Hamilton的RPM程序之一应用于团队组织领域,作为成熟度模型的实际示例。独创性/价值这项工作通过关注支持提供综合护理所需的资源、团队和流程的安排,扩展了以前的远程医疗成熟度模型。虽然该模式的灵感来自当地的方案,该模式是高度可转移到其他RPM方案。