In cars (are we really safest of all?): interior sensing and emotional opacity

Q1 Social Sciences
Andrew McStay, Lachlan D. Urquhart
{"title":"In cars (are we really safest of all?): interior sensing and emotional opacity","authors":"Andrew McStay, Lachlan D. Urquhart","doi":"10.1080/13600869.2021.2009181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper analyses expert and regulatory perspectives on car driver-monitoring systems that measure bodies to infer and react to emotions, fatigue, and attentiveness. Developers of driver-monitoring systems promise increased safety on the road, alongside comfort for cabin occupants through personalisation and automation. The impetus is three-fold, namely: (1) European road safety policy seeks to vastly reduce road deaths using computational surveillance; (2) there is a growing interest around in cabin safety solutions that sense emotion and affective states of drivers and passengers; and (3) autonomous driving trends are changing the nature of interactions between vehicle and driver. Safety led applications are of special interest because they are backed by policy and standards initiatives including the European Union’s Vision Zero policy and the industry led New Car Assessment Programme (NCAP). Informed by 13 interviews with experts working in and around in-cabin sensing technologies, this paper first identifies and explores features of emergent in-cabin profiling through emotional artificial intelligence (AI) and biometric measures. It then examines how in-car sensing should be regulated by analysing data protection laws and the proposed EU AI Act. A deep ambivalence emerged from our participants around the emergence of emotional AI in cars, and how best to regulate these technologies.","PeriodicalId":53660,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Law, Computers and Technology","volume":"34 1","pages":"470 - 493"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Law, Computers and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2021.2009181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper analyses expert and regulatory perspectives on car driver-monitoring systems that measure bodies to infer and react to emotions, fatigue, and attentiveness. Developers of driver-monitoring systems promise increased safety on the road, alongside comfort for cabin occupants through personalisation and automation. The impetus is three-fold, namely: (1) European road safety policy seeks to vastly reduce road deaths using computational surveillance; (2) there is a growing interest around in cabin safety solutions that sense emotion and affective states of drivers and passengers; and (3) autonomous driving trends are changing the nature of interactions between vehicle and driver. Safety led applications are of special interest because they are backed by policy and standards initiatives including the European Union’s Vision Zero policy and the industry led New Car Assessment Programme (NCAP). Informed by 13 interviews with experts working in and around in-cabin sensing technologies, this paper first identifies and explores features of emergent in-cabin profiling through emotional artificial intelligence (AI) and biometric measures. It then examines how in-car sensing should be regulated by analysing data protection laws and the proposed EU AI Act. A deep ambivalence emerged from our participants around the emergence of emotional AI in cars, and how best to regulate these technologies.
在汽车里(我们真的是最安全的吗?):内部感知和情感不透明
本文分析了专家和监管机构对汽车驾驶员监测系统的看法,该系统可以测量身体对情绪、疲劳和注意力的推断和反应。驾驶员监控系统的开发人员承诺,通过个性化和自动化,可以提高道路安全性,同时为车内人员提供舒适。其推动力有三方面,即:(1)欧洲道路安全政策寻求利用计算机监控大幅减少道路死亡人数;(2)人们对能够感知驾驶员和乘客情绪和情感状态的座舱安全解决方案越来越感兴趣;(3)自动驾驶趋势正在改变车辆与驾驶员之间互动的性质。安全驱动型应用特别受关注,因为它们得到了政策和标准倡议的支持,包括欧盟的零愿景政策和行业主导的新车评估计划(NCAP)。通过13位座舱内传感技术专家的访谈,本文首先通过情感人工智能(AI)和生物识别措施识别并探讨了紧急座舱内分析的特征。然后,通过分析数据保护法和拟议的欧盟人工智能法案,研究如何监管车载传感。我们的参与者对汽车中情感人工智能的出现以及如何最好地监管这些技术产生了深刻的矛盾心理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信