PERSETERUAN IDEOLOGI DALAM DINAMIKA KRITIK HADIS ANTARA MUHAMMAD NASHIRUDDIN AL-ALBANI DAN ABDULLAH AL-GHUMARIY

Muhamad Rezi, M. Taufik, Adlan Sanur Tarihoran, Penmardianto
{"title":"PERSETERUAN IDEOLOGI DALAM DINAMIKA KRITIK HADIS ANTARA MUHAMMAD NASHIRUDDIN AL-ALBANI DAN ABDULLAH AL-GHUMARIY","authors":"Muhamad Rezi, M. Taufik, Adlan Sanur Tarihoran, Penmardianto","doi":"10.24239/rsy.v19i1.1354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the Takhrij Hadith activists who are phenomenal this century is Muhammad Nashiruddin al-Albani. However, the re-correction of the history with the narrative of the jarh that seemed impolite and against sanad, which was believed to be the ulama, was established and became the point of controversy for other hadith practitioners. There are many Muhadditsin figures who marked al-Albani regarding fiddling with Sanad again. One of them is a Moroccan hadith practitioner, Abdullah al-Ghumariy who is also known for his sauce. At first glance, the ideology and theology of al-Ghumariy and al-Albaniy, are clearly different. al-Ghumariy with his daughter and Tarekat is inversely proportional to al-Albani, a role model of Salafiy, who is aggressively voicing the error and bid'ah of Sufism. In his criticism of al-Albani, especially in Rasâ'il al-Ghumâriyyah, al-Ghumariy can be said to be more focused on the presentation of Sanad criticism carried out by al-Albaniy and there is no editor related to criticism of al-Albaniy's ideology and theology. The focus of the discussion of this paper is how a cross-opinion form correcting the hadith wrapped in ideological and theological differences between al-Albaniy and Abdullah al-Ghumariy.  The method used is the comparative explanation (syarh muqaran) with a character study approach.","PeriodicalId":31634,"journal":{"name":"Fikrah Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah dan Studi Keagamaan","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fikrah Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah dan Studi Keagamaan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24239/rsy.v19i1.1354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the Takhrij Hadith activists who are phenomenal this century is Muhammad Nashiruddin al-Albani. However, the re-correction of the history with the narrative of the jarh that seemed impolite and against sanad, which was believed to be the ulama, was established and became the point of controversy for other hadith practitioners. There are many Muhadditsin figures who marked al-Albani regarding fiddling with Sanad again. One of them is a Moroccan hadith practitioner, Abdullah al-Ghumariy who is also known for his sauce. At first glance, the ideology and theology of al-Ghumariy and al-Albaniy, are clearly different. al-Ghumariy with his daughter and Tarekat is inversely proportional to al-Albani, a role model of Salafiy, who is aggressively voicing the error and bid'ah of Sufism. In his criticism of al-Albani, especially in Rasâ'il al-Ghumâriyyah, al-Ghumariy can be said to be more focused on the presentation of Sanad criticism carried out by al-Albaniy and there is no editor related to criticism of al-Albaniy's ideology and theology. The focus of the discussion of this paper is how a cross-opinion form correcting the hadith wrapped in ideological and theological differences between al-Albaniy and Abdullah al-Ghumariy.  The method used is the comparative explanation (syarh muqaran) with a character study approach.
穆罕默德·纳西鲁丁·阿尔阿尔巴尼(Muhammad Nashiruddin al-Albani)是本世纪杰出的圣训积极分子之一。然而,用jarh的叙述重新纠正历史,这似乎是不礼貌的,反对被认为是乌拉玛的sanad,这是建立的,并成为其他圣训从业者争论的焦点。有许多穆哈迪钦的人物警告阿尔-阿尔巴尼不要再与萨那德打交道。其中一位是摩洛哥圣训实践者阿卜杜拉·古马瑞(Abdullah al-Ghumariy),他也以他的酱汁而闻名。乍一看,al-Ghumariy和al-Albaniy的意识形态和神学显然不同。al-Ghumariy带着他的女儿和Tarekat与al-Albani成反比。al-Albani是salafy的榜样,他积极地宣扬苏菲主义的错误和罪恶。在他对阿尔阿尔巴尼的批评中,特别是在ras 'il al- ghum riyyah中,可以说al-Ghumariy更侧重于呈现阿尔阿尔巴尼所进行的Sanad批评,而没有与阿尔阿尔巴尼的意识形态和神学批评相关的编辑。本文讨论的重点是一种跨意见形式如何纠正阿尔巴尼和阿卜杜拉·阿尔·古马瑞之间包裹在意识形态和神学差异中的圣训。使用的方法是比较解释(syarh muqaran)与性格研究的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书