CDIO Initiative: A Guarantee for Successful Accreditation of Engineering Programmes

Q1 Earth and Planetary Sciences
A. Al-Obaidi
{"title":"CDIO Initiative: A Guarantee for Successful Accreditation of Engineering Programmes","authors":"A. Al-Obaidi","doi":"10.17509/IJOST.V6I1.31521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The accreditation bodies and engineering councils set a number of qualifying requirements and accreditation criteria to ensure the quality of engineering graduates and programmes. One of these requirements is the engineering curriculum. Some institutions using the traditional engineering curriculum often face difficulties and burden to meet the accreditation minimum academic requirements as their curriculum lacks the innovation and the integration of graduate attributes such as personal, interpersonal, teamwork, entrepreneurship, development of life skills and emotional wellbeing, among many. This eventually leads to deferred or even declined accreditation. To overcome these difficulties, the CDIO initiative is an ideal tool for successful accreditation. The CDIO standards, syllabus, engineering curriculum, and learning outcomes are not only meeting what accreditation bodies require, but they offer innovative curriculum more on high-level cognitive skills set in the context of the product-system lifecycle; Conceiving-Designing-Operating-Implementing metaphases. This paper shares a successful engineering education experience of the School of Engineering/Taylor’s University and how the CDIO initiative contributed not only to a successful accreditation but also to have a new innovative engineering curriculum. The adopted new curriculum is innovative, hands-on and project-based in order to achieve integrated learning where acquiring discipline-specific knowledge and CDIO skills take place simultaneously","PeriodicalId":37185,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17509/IJOST.V6I1.31521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The accreditation bodies and engineering councils set a number of qualifying requirements and accreditation criteria to ensure the quality of engineering graduates and programmes. One of these requirements is the engineering curriculum. Some institutions using the traditional engineering curriculum often face difficulties and burden to meet the accreditation minimum academic requirements as their curriculum lacks the innovation and the integration of graduate attributes such as personal, interpersonal, teamwork, entrepreneurship, development of life skills and emotional wellbeing, among many. This eventually leads to deferred or even declined accreditation. To overcome these difficulties, the CDIO initiative is an ideal tool for successful accreditation. The CDIO standards, syllabus, engineering curriculum, and learning outcomes are not only meeting what accreditation bodies require, but they offer innovative curriculum more on high-level cognitive skills set in the context of the product-system lifecycle; Conceiving-Designing-Operating-Implementing metaphases. This paper shares a successful engineering education experience of the School of Engineering/Taylor’s University and how the CDIO initiative contributed not only to a successful accreditation but also to have a new innovative engineering curriculum. The adopted new curriculum is innovative, hands-on and project-based in order to achieve integrated learning where acquiring discipline-specific knowledge and CDIO skills take place simultaneously
CDIO倡议:工程课程成功认证的保证
认证机构和工程委员会制定了一系列的资格要求和认证准则,以确保工程专业毕业生和课程的质量。其中一项要求是工程课程。一些采用传统工程课程的院校在达到认证的最低学术要求方面往往面临困难和负担,因为它们的课程缺乏创新,缺乏对毕业生特质的整合,如个人、人际关系、团队合作、创业精神、生活技能发展和情感健康等。这最终导致延期甚至拒绝认证。为了克服这些困难,CDIO倡议是成功认证的理想工具。CDIO的标准、教学大纲、工程课程和学习成果不仅满足认证机构的要求,而且还提供创新的课程,更多地关注产品系统生命周期背景下的高水平认知技能;Conceiving-Designing-Operating-Implementing中期。本文分享了泰勒大学工程学院成功的工程教育经验,以及CDIO倡议如何不仅为成功的认证做出了贡献,而且还创造了新的创新工程课程。采用的新课程是创新的、实践的和基于项目的,以实现综合学习,在获得学科特定知识和CDIO技能的同时发生
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology
Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信