Thematic horizon of the study of linguistic reality: the context of non-classical philosophy of language

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
M. Kornienko
{"title":"Thematic horizon of the study of linguistic reality: the context of non-classical philosophy of language","authors":"M. Kornienko","doi":"10.17223/22220836/46/6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article defines the specifics of the non-classical paradigm of the philosophy of language, in the problematic field of which the language is presented as a creative process and a form of development of the spirit, spiritual creativity and acquisition the truth. Revealing the specifics of the non-classical stage of the philosophy of language, within the limits of which the language is characterized as creative processuality, the author shows that the energy of the spirit, manifesting its spontaneity in the language, unattainable in its spontaneity, makes the language alive. It is shown that the philosophy of language as an independent science begins the countdown with the works of W. von Humboldt, while at an earlier stage, language was the subject of analysis in the context of general epistemological issues. The author analyzes the role of F. de Saussure in the development of the philosophy of language, reveals the role of the linguistic revolution in the transformation of the paradigm of the metaphysics of language. It is shown that, starting from the linguistic turn, a new problematic is introduced into the philosophy of language: an approach has been formed in the problem field of non-classical philosophy, within which the language was given the status of an alternative to the Cartesian cogi-to. It was the linguistic turn that was the stage of transition to the new problems of the philosophy of language, which made the subject of study the contexts and premises of utterances, objectified language structures, the polysemy and everyday functioning of the language, the functions of the language (including political functions). A departure from the epistemological and psychological component of research is associated with a linguistic turn, interest in the meaning and meaning was formed, and the language itself was interpreted as the ultimate ontological basis of thinking. Structuralism, hermeneutics, linguistic philosophy turned to the study of language. As a result of the linguistic turn, philosophical problems acquired a different orientation and began to search for philosophical problems through an appeal to the ontology of linguistic phenomena.","PeriodicalId":41702,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Kulturologiya i Iskusstvovedenie-Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Kulturologiya i Iskusstvovedenie-Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/22220836/46/6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article defines the specifics of the non-classical paradigm of the philosophy of language, in the problematic field of which the language is presented as a creative process and a form of development of the spirit, spiritual creativity and acquisition the truth. Revealing the specifics of the non-classical stage of the philosophy of language, within the limits of which the language is characterized as creative processuality, the author shows that the energy of the spirit, manifesting its spontaneity in the language, unattainable in its spontaneity, makes the language alive. It is shown that the philosophy of language as an independent science begins the countdown with the works of W. von Humboldt, while at an earlier stage, language was the subject of analysis in the context of general epistemological issues. The author analyzes the role of F. de Saussure in the development of the philosophy of language, reveals the role of the linguistic revolution in the transformation of the paradigm of the metaphysics of language. It is shown that, starting from the linguistic turn, a new problematic is introduced into the philosophy of language: an approach has been formed in the problem field of non-classical philosophy, within which the language was given the status of an alternative to the Cartesian cogi-to. It was the linguistic turn that was the stage of transition to the new problems of the philosophy of language, which made the subject of study the contexts and premises of utterances, objectified language structures, the polysemy and everyday functioning of the language, the functions of the language (including political functions). A departure from the epistemological and psychological component of research is associated with a linguistic turn, interest in the meaning and meaning was formed, and the language itself was interpreted as the ultimate ontological basis of thinking. Structuralism, hermeneutics, linguistic philosophy turned to the study of language. As a result of the linguistic turn, philosophical problems acquired a different orientation and began to search for philosophical problems through an appeal to the ontology of linguistic phenomena.
语言现实研究的主题视界:非古典语言哲学的语境
本文界定了语言哲学的非经典范式的具体特征,在该范式中,语言被呈现为一种创造性的过程和一种精神发展、精神创造和真理获取的形式。作者揭示了语言哲学的非古典阶段的特点,在此范围内,语言被赋予了创造过程的特征,揭示了精神的能量,它在语言中表现出自发性,这种自发性是无法达到的,它使语言有了生命。研究表明,语言哲学作为一门独立的科学从洪堡的著作开始倒计时,而在早期阶段,语言是在一般认识论问题的背景下进行分析的主题。本文分析了索绪尔在语言哲学发展中的作用,揭示了语言革命在语言形而上学范式转变中的作用。从语言学转向开始,语言哲学中引入了一个新的问题:在非古典哲学的问题领域中形成了一种方法,在这种方法中,语言被赋予了笛卡尔逻辑逻辑的替代地位。语言转向是向语言哲学新问题过渡的阶段,它使话语的语境和前提、客观化的语言结构、语言的多义性和日常功能、语言的功能(包括政治功能)成为研究的主题。与认识论和心理学研究成分的背离与语言学转向有关,对意义和意义的兴趣形成了,语言本身被解释为思维的最终本体论基础。结构主义、解释学、语言哲学转向语言研究。由于语言转向,哲学问题获得了不同的取向,并开始通过诉诸语言现象的本体论来寻找哲学问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信